Quantcast
Channel: Encyclopedia of American Loons
Viewing all 2331 articles
Browse latest View live

#1591: William Estrada

$
0
0
William Estrada is the former director of the fundamentalist organization Generation Joshua – founded by Mike Smith (current president) and Michael Farris – and the Home School Legal Defense Association. As a homeschooling activist Estrada has been tirelessly campaigning against Common Core and any other measures he claims take away “parental control” over children’s education. Of course, his organization was created to train children to be activists for rightwing candidates who are pushing conservative platforms – indeed, to “reclaim America for the glory of the Christian god” (i.e. not parental freedom; that’s just a handy phrase for political campaigning). More than that, though, they are trying to impose upon homeschoolers a certain narrative: As you remember, in the Old Testament, the Egyptians held the Israelites in captivity until Moses was chosen to lead them out of captivity and into the Promised Land, and for the people of Generation Joshua, Christians in the US are in the same situation now as the Israelites were in Egypt: Whereas the U.S. was, according to them, founded as a Christian nation, the forces of secularism have held Christians in captivity as the U.S. progressed, and homeschooling is their means for leading America back to its Christian roots by training children to be new, fanatic, religious warriors. To achieve this, all aspects of the children’s lives will need to be monitored, of course, and the organization has introduced an impressive apparatus to prevent children from growing up disagreeing with the agenda: they have books, videos, seminars, and camps dedicated to ensuring that kids stay in line with the ideology – a favored tactic is scaring parents with statistics showing how many kids relinquish their parents’ fundamentalism and bigotry once they go to college, thereby motivating them to push even harder. 

Curriculum-wise, they offer courses such as Introduction to Constitutional Law, Democracy in America, Campaign School: Successful Cam­paigning, Founding Fathers I & II, and Revolutionary War Era Sermons (targeting parents as much as children), and they have a close contact with David Barton and, of course, Mike Farris, who president of Patrick Henry College – indeed due to a Templeton grant (!), Generation Joshua has been awarding $80,000 worth of scholarships to its members so that they can attend Patrick Henry College.

Estrada himself appears to be under the illusion that he/they are winning the culture wars. In 2011, for instance, he argued that young, homeschooled people had been organizing in order to fight marriage equality, and that they seemed to be doing so successfully – you almost feel some pity for him.

Diagnosis: Raging, raving fundamentalist madman. This is scary shit.



#1592: Lee Euler

$
0
0
I think this is him, but it is a little hard
to identify him among the stock
photos of people in lab coats
("doctors") and "happy patients".
Lee Euler is the editor of the online newsletter Cancer Defeated, where he promotes articles like “Natural miracle prevents up to 99.4% of tumors” (how do you test for prevention at such a degree of exactitude, you might wonder but you know the answer) and “Cancer Clinics No One Will Tell You About” (no one, in fact), as well as books like “How to Cure Almost Any Cancer at home for $5.15 a Day”, “Breast Cancer Cover-Up” and “The Missing Ingredient” (about some ingredient in your diet that will cure most of your problems – you have to buy the book to find out what it is; even altmed-susceptible reviewers on amazon were less than impressed). It really isn’t necessary to go on, is it? The quack Miranda warning is at least reasonably prominently displayed on his website. Apart from that he’s got anecdotes, platitudes and conspiracies. This is spam.


Diagnosis: Who on Earth takes these things seriously, you might ask? Well, presumably only people who are scared or desperate. Lee Euler has chosen his prey wisely.

#1593: Andre Evans

$
0
0
Complementary and alternative medicine” (CAM) is more or less code for bullshit, but though medical bullshit comes in a variety of forms, some utterly idiotic underlying principles tend to show up rather frequently. One of these is vitalism. Another is most explicitly formulated as the Law of Attraction, the idea that if you really wish something hard enough it will come true. One reason why this idea is so popular in altmed is, of course, that it paves the way for victim-blaming: If you tried something and didn’t get well, it’s because you didn’t really adopt the right mindset and didn’t really try hard enough. And the idea that “it only works if you really believe that it will” provides not only room for blaming the victim, but an excellent means for facilitating motivated reasoning in one’s victims.

That doesn’t mean that the practitioners in question don’t really believe their own bullshit. Andre Evans, for instance, even has a “Proof that Your Own Thoughts and Beliefs Can Cause Self-Healing” over at a website called Natural Society(no, you don’t get a link). It’s basically an article crammed with dubiously coherent pseudoscience, anonymous anecdotes and the placebo effects as “evidence” that, if you just think about it hard enough, you can “heal yourself” of virtually anything (no, Evans has not the faintest idea what the placebo effect really is; hint: it’s not that believing that you get well will help make you well).

Says Evans: “The power of the mind is immense. Its influence can literally bend reality to match its perspective […] If you believe something to be true, you will conform the world around you to match this expectation.” At least it will sometimes look that way; it’s called “subjective validation”. And “If you believe that your treatment is helping you, you could actually cause massive self-healing to occur. Assuming a disposition will automatically prejudice your mind, and therefore cause your body to react either positively or negatively.” And that, readers, is a stellar example of appeal to magical thinking.

I admit that I have found no other information about Evans – we’re probably not talking a central figure in the delusion-movement here – but the idea he defends is common and stupid enough to merit him an entry.


Diagnosis: I do suspect, though, that Evans is not alone in thinking that the placebo effect really works that way. It doesn’t. This is amazing bullshit.

#1594: Bruce Evans

$
0
0
We’ve covered a couple of the signatories to the Discovery Institute’s petition A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism before – the true believers; not those who were hoodwinked into signing. The thing is: The US has a lot of questionable educational institutions that hire a lot of faculty with questionable levels of competence (but formal degrees), so it isn’t much surprise that the Discovery Institute are able to find a handful of fundamentalists willing to sign whatever anti-science petition they put in front of them.

Bruce Evans is a good example. Evans has a PhD in neurobiology and published some papers in fields unrelated to evolution back in the days. Currently, Evans is a professor of biology and department chair at Huntington University, a Christian liberal arts college, the faculty of which subscribe to a fundamentalist statement of faith (“[w]e believe the Bible to be the inspired, the only infallible, authoritative Word of God”), and which apparently happily allowed Evans to teach an EXCEL class on the Origins of Life. Evans is a committed creationist (and Sunday school teacher), and was even on the board of reviewers for Explore Evolution. According to the, uh, educational institution’s website, Evans’ “primary interests are in the areas of intelligent design, cognitive neuroscience and dinosaurs.” Dinosaurs? What are his credentials? Oh, he “has spent time with paleontologists at fossil sites in Colorado, Utah, Texas, and Indiana,” which is … not exactly the same as having a research background. More insidiously, though, he “helps to educate local elementary students about dinosaurs.” He has also given presentations at Intelligent Design conferences and “led discussions on these topics in colleges and churches in Indiana and Ohio.” That should count for something, shouldn’t it?

What is interesting in this context is that Evans is also on the list Rethinking AIDS, an HIV denialist petition. We’ve found no further elaboration of his views on this matter, however.


Diagnosis: Fundamentalist pseudo-scientist. “Anti-scientist” is probably more accurate, given his outreach efforts. Not one of the big fish, to be sure, but he seems to have influence enough to be considered very dangerous.

#1595: Sue Everhart

$
0
0
Sue Everhart is the former Chairman of the Georgia Republican Party, and her entry in our Encyclopedia was ensured by her 2013 argument against same sex marriage. Everhart warned that if same sex marriages were to be legalized there is a legitimate risk that people who are “as straight as an arrow” will take advantage of it by pretending to be gay and marrying other heterosexual people for the benefits to which they may then be entitled. If you can’t see why that argument qualifies her for an entry, you should probably not be in a position of power or influence. She also said that “it is not natural for two women or two men to be married. If it was natural, they would have the equipment to have a sexual relationship.”


Diagnosis: A very silly person. Hopefully neutralized, but we doubt that the people taking her place are much better.

#1596: Winston Ewert

$
0
0
Winston Ewert is Bill Dembski’s at least one-time research assistant and support staff at his Evolutionary Informatics Lab, which is not a lab. As such, he was Dembski’s coauthor (together with George Montañez and Robert J. Marks II) on the paper “Efficient Per Query Information Extraction from a Hamming Oracle”, a paper that has become somewhat legendary for its perfection of the art of obfuscation in the service of anti-science (it is discussed in some detail here), as well as “A General Theory of Information Cost Incurred by Successful Search”, which seems to be not really much better. Ewert’s reply to critics is discussed here; in fact, in December 2015 he finally admitted that the No Free Lunch theorems don’t work as an argument against evolution, but it is unclear whether he is willing to admit that he admitted this. (See in particular this and this for some details).

He also writes posts for Uncommon Descent, in particular posts that display a notoriously poor understanding of (one almost suspects deliberately misleading claims on) probability, such as this.

Ewert is currently apparently affiliated with the Discovery Institute’s Biologic Institute, and has published his own stuff in their house journal Bio-Complexity, which doesn’t set particularly high standards for papers that support their house brand of pseudoscience. The standards are well illustrated by his review paper on several computer models of evolution “Digital Irreducible Complexity: A Survey of Irreducible Complexity in Computer Simulations”, discussed here and here.

The Evolutionary Informatics Lab involves the following senior researchers (as per 2012) in addition to Dembski, Marks, Ewert and Montañez):
-       William F. Basener, Professor of Mathematics at Rochester Institute of Technology and signatory to A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism.
-       Gil Dodgen.
-       Norman C. Griswold, Emeritus Halliburton Professor of Electrical Engineering (retired) and former Department Chair at Texas A&M University.
-       Granville Sewell.
-       Donald C. Wunsch II, Mary K. Finley Missouri Distinguished Professor of Computer Engineering at the Missouri University of Science and Technology.


Diagnosis: We wish to be reluctant to use the word “dishonest”. Suffice to say that Ewert isn’t exactly contributing to the scientific enterprise, unless you count inadvertently making scientists aware of certain interesting fallacies and misunderstandings.

#1597: Andrew Fabich

$
0
0
Andrew Fabich is a creationist hackjob who teaches microbiology at “Liberty” “University”. He is probably most well-known for his “evaluation” of Richard Lenski’s famous E. coli evolution experiment, which was feebly disparaged by Ken Ham in his infamous debate with Bill Nye. As you may know, Lenski’s twenty-year project reported that, as a result of several beneficial mutations, his organisms had acquired the ability to metabolize citrate (or an ability to transport it through the cell wall prior to metabolizing it), a completely new ability and an increase in complexity provided by a beneficial mutation that was then fixed in the population by natural selection. Of course, according to creationists this is something that shouldn’t happen, but which obviously did, so Fabich had little choice but to turn to dubious levels of honesty when evaluating it: “When I look at the evidence that people cite of E. coli supposedly evolving over 30 years, over 30,000 generations in the lab, and people say it is now able to grow on citrate, I don’t deny that it grows on citrate, but it’s not any kind of new information, the information is already there and it’s just a switch that gets turned on and off. That’s what they reported and there’s nothing new.” That use of the word “information” is entirely meaningless and irrelevant, and Fabich seems to know it (two mutations took place creating an entirely new trait in the population, remember), but it does tell you quite a bit at the approach faculty members at “Liberty” “University” (and creationists in general) take toward science.

But Fabich has a rangeof gotcha objections to secularism and evolution (he unsurprisingly fails to distinguish those). “Ultimately, unlike those with a biblical worldview, secular humanists have no clear moral basis to put themselves at risk to help the downtrodden, sick, and infirm,writes Fabich: “If we are just the product of random chance processes over time, as Darwinian evolution asserts[nope, he has no more clue about evolution than he does about ethics], then why not let the sick die off so the strong will survive?You ain’t heard that before, have you?

He has also published in Answer in Genesis’s house journal, the Answers Research Journal. For vol. 4 he provided the embarrassingly feeble “Time to Abandon Postmodernism: Living a New Way,” a piece of quasi-philosophy displaying no understanding of modernism or postmodernism (the latter is described as characterized by “lauding totalitarianism and nihilism”) but plenty of laughable strawmen, and which abstains from discussing any specific example of modernism or postmodernism except for John Cage’s 4’33, which he apparently uses as evidence for the death of postmodernism since it, as an esoteric artwork with no “commercial possibilities,” is not being promoted commercially.


Diagnosis: Staunch opponent of truth, reason and science – as we’d expect from his affiliation – Fabich is not above using rank dishonesty and subversion; but then again, he’s usually preaching to the choir anyways, and they don’t seem to care overly much. 

#1598: John Fagan

$
0
0
John Fagan is possibly one of the strangest characters to be covered in our Encyclopedia, and that is not really meant as a compliment. Fagan is, apparently, a molecular biologist gone completely snowflake. He made some headlines back in 1994 when he returned a $613,882 grant from NIH rather than proceed with his genetic research at a little-known university in Fairfield, Iowa, because he ostensibly feared that the results of his genetic research could, in the wrong hands, be used to manipulate human DNA. He has later become a, well, character in the anti-science brigade opposing GMOs through his company Genetic ID, which proclaims neutrality in the GMO debate (a public, not a scientific, debate) and tries to appear to be a group of detached scientists. Fagan himself has, however, written a book warning against the alleged perils of genetic engineering, with which he has toured the world.

And here’s an interesting detail: Fagan has since 1984 been on the faculty at Maharishi University of Managementwhere transcendental meditation is part of the core curriculum and students are taught that bouncing on their buttocks is a means to world peace – no really, these people genuinely believe that they can fly! And the full title of Fagan’s anti-GMO book is “Genetic Engineering: The Hazards; Vedic Engineering: The Solution,” and it claims, based on insane New Age musings, that GMO is dangerous but that we can manage our own health through through herbal and meditational treatment, spiritual handwaving and magical wishful thinking, as long as it is sufficiently fluffy. It should be mentioned that Genetic ID’s laboratory manager, Bernd Schoel, has taught biochemistry at Maharishi University. Think about that for a moment.

In fairness, the analyses done at Genetic ID may not always be all that bad, and the company has at least on occasion seemed to come across as reasonably level-headed, but you can’t just ditch the baggage of being associated with someone like John Fagan, even if Fagan has more recently publicly taken a somewhat more moderate stance on GMOs. Besides, Genetic ID is a for-profit entity that stands to benefit from any controversy over GMOs – and it has used ConspiraseaCruise star Jeffery Smith, no less, as a spokesperson (and yes, the connections between the various anti-GMO activists are interesting). The history of the organization is also interesting: After struggling for some years it brought in organic fertilizer entrepreneur Bill Witherspoon in 1998 to reorganize the company. Witherspoon, it seems worth mentioning, was once fined by federal officials for carving geometric designs into an Oregon desert to “enliven human consciousness,” and he joined Genetic ID on the condition that he could continue to work intuitively. Many of the employees are accordingly Maharishi followers.

Fagan has moreover been an informal advisor to the Natural Law Party, and in 1998 he was even a plaintiff in a 1998 lawsuit challenging an FDA. determination that genetically altered foods were safe. The United States District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed the suit.


Diagnosis: Still, it seems, a particularly fluffy snowflake, and – it seems – a serious contributor to the anti-science and anti-civilization project in the US.

#1599: Pat Fagan

$
0
0
Being a senior fellow at the Family Research Council (FRC) is a good way of shouting out to the world that you are crazy and evil, and Pat Fagan is also the director of FRC’s MARRI institute, which a purports to be a “social science institute studying the impact of marriage, family and religion on children, adults and society in general.” It doesn’t have much to do with science. Fagan is the kind of guy who compares a UN report criticizing the Vatican over its handling of sexual abuse cases to the Kristallnacht – the children’s rights committee are like Nazi forces and the UN like the complicit German authorities –  because it dares to criticizethe Vatican for failing to … you know, it’s difficult to figure out how a deranged mind like Fagan thinks the comparison is supposed to work.

Though he doesn’t like Nazis, Fagan doesn’t like freedom or liberty either. Railing against the 1972 Eisenstadt v. Baird ruling, Fagan said that any “functioning society” should ban all sex outside of marriage and that the overturning of the Massachusetts law banning the distribution of contraceptives to unmarried people, may rank “as the single most destructive decision in the history of the Court.”

In the Q&A session of a talk by Heritage Foundation’s Ryan Anderson, Fagan suggested a novel (juvenile) strategy for winning the marriage equality issue: Call gay marriage “garriage”, lesbian marriage “larriage” and generic homosexual marriage “harriage”. By doing so, Fagan reasoned, you will convince people that gay marriage is ridiculous and eventually, gradually vindicate bigotry: “getting these words into use I think is key. And that will take time, but whomever holds the language ultimately holds the whole game,” just like in a schoolyard, if some kids make up a mean nickname for some other kid, it might catch on and ultimately turn the rest of the kids against the initial victim.


Diagnosis: Rabid, lunatic, religiously fanatic bigot. Evil to the core may, however, explain his behavior better than insane, though the two aren’t easily distinguishable.

#1600: Mike Fair

$
0
0
More state legislatures; this time it’s the South Carolina Senate, which is unfortunate enough to be saddled with Mike Fair (6thdistrict). Fair, a resident of Greenville, has been serving since 1995, and as a hardcore religious fundamentalist he has been promoting things like abstinence-based sex education and proposed legislation mandating that sex education classes include information that homosexual behavior is “unnatural, unhealthy and illegal.” Yeah, accuracy isn’t his strong suit, but incorrectness is par for the course. In 2014 the South Carolina House voted to cut $70,000 from the budgets of two state universities to punish them for assigning books about LGBT people to students; Fair followed up by accusing one of the schools of gay “recruitment”.

But perhaps most importantly, Fair is a creationist who has achieved quite some notoriety for his long-standing efforts to have intelligent design creationism taught in public schools:

-       In 2003, he tried to amend a bill dealing with instructional materials and textbooks to require a disclaimer about the origin of life as “not scientifically verifiable”; failing that, he got support for establishing a committee to investigate the science standards regarding the teaching of the origin of species, determining whether there is a consensus on the definition of science, and whether alternatives to evolution should be offered in schools. He explicitly said his intention was to show that Intelligent Design was a viable alternative. The bill died, however, when the legislature adjourned.
-       He quickly bounced back, however, with numerous new efforts, including S.909, a bill modeled on the so-called Santorum amendment. If enacted, it would have required that “[w]here topics are taught that may generate controversy, such as biological evolution, the curriculum should help students to understand the full range of scientific views that exist, why such topics may generate controversy, and how scientific discoveries can profoundly affect society.” That one failed as well.
-       In 2005, he launched (together with Rep. Bob Walker, who sent a letter to the Board of Education claiming that it was “unanimous” that the evidence for evolution had been fabricated) a Discovery Institute-backed campaign against the treatment of evolution in the state’s science standards, once again pushing “critical analysis” language for the purpose of undermining the teaching of evolution. He didn’t get it, despite the backing of governor Mark Sanford, but claimed a victory for intelligent design nonetheless. As did the Discovery Institute, but they tend to claim victory no matter what happens.
-       In 2008 he introduced an “academic freedom” bill (S.B. 1383) that would have specifically allowed public school teachers to critique evolution in their classrooms (which died in committee).

And so on. In 2014, in particular, Fair was annoyed by the fact that a study done for the Fordham Foundation once again gave South Carolina an “A” for how well it teaches evolution, thus threatening South Carolina’s reputation as a backwards hole, we suppose, and pointed out that no one was there when life began to make a scientific observation about it (no, he doesn’t even …) and proposed, once again, that science books in South Carolina public schools should have the following statement posted in them: “The cause or causes of life are not scientifically verifiable. Therefore, empirical science cannot provide data about the beginning of life,” which has nothing to do with evolution but does reveal, yet again, a staggering lack of understanding of the scientific approach to questions (hint: hypotheses-testing by virtue of a hypothesis’s observable predictions: Claims about the past tend to predict certain observations now). Apparently the eye is also a serious objection to evolution, mostly because Fair can’t be bothered to, you know, consult the relevant literature.

At least Fair got support for his efforts from USC math professor Daniel Dix, a member of Bill Dembski’s International Society for Complexity, Information, and Design and a signatory to this, who appealed to incredulity and his lack of background in evolutionary biology to question evolution, and Joseph Henson, chairman emeritus of Bob Jones University’s division of natural science, who appealed to the Biblical Flood. The Board of Education once again ignored Fair’s concerns, however (also here); this one involving Fair and another SC legislature creationist, Kevin Bryant, is telling as well). But perhaps Fair used the aftermath to figure out why scientists reject his objections? Oh, yes. He returned later in 2014 after apparently doing some research to require that evolution should be taught as a theory, not a fact. So there. He also claimed that “the evolution controversy often comes down to understanding the difference between macro-evolution and micro-evolution” and that there are gaps in the fossil record – but of course, deep down, debates over topics in science are for Mike Fair really a debate over values. Here he shakes his fists at the courts.

Fair hasn’t restricted his lunatic antics to evolution, however. He has also referred to abortions as our nation’s holocaust – in response to a poll of three Senate districts, showing that a majority of respondents to the poll said they support access to abortion at 20 weeks after they were told that such abortions are rare and often involve fetal abnormalities; Fair effectively said that he didn’t trust the poll because he didn’t like the results.

In 2011, Fair proposed a bill that would have prohibited Sharia law from being enacted in the state of South Carolina (it is hard to express how silly such a bill is), and (unsuccessfully) introduced legislation that would have prohibited Common Core educational standards from being imposed on South Carolina public schools.


Diagnosis: Plenty of gohmerts in the state legislatures, but Mike Fair is still an exceptional specimen. Anti-science, anti-reason, and anti-accuracy to the core, he hasn’t had much success thus far; he does, however, remain in a position of power, a fact that does not reflect well on the people of South Carolina’s 6th district.

#1601: Richard Fales & Willie Dye

$
0
0
Oh, the stuff that one can dredge up on the Internet. This time it’s a matter of a couple of rather obscure Biblical archeologists. Richard Fales is listed as professor of Archaeology, Greek, and Apologetics at the California Pacific School of Theology. The California Pacific School of Theology is an unaccredited diploma mill (and possibly defunct at present), but their school catalog at least used to list Fales as a “genuine archaeologist” with post-graduate degrees from the Baptist Bible Seminary and Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. Both deny ever having had a Richard Fales as a graduate or student, respectively. Not that it necessarily makes much of a difference given the field, but still.

Willie Dye seems to outdo him, however, and lists multiple Ph.Ds in his CV from various – shall we say – “dubious” sources. Dye is also president at the same, uh, institution … oh wait, he’s academic staff at that school (the president is one Bill Forges, who has his PhD from … California Pacific School of Theology, and who is afraid of demons); Dye is president of the Pacific National University– which may or may not be indiscernible from the other institution in anything but name.

They’re otherwise pretty obscure, but Fales did at least contribute a section to Ray Comfort’s hilariously desperate Scientific Facts in the Bible: 100 Reasons to Believe the Bible is Supernatural in Origin arguing – through misrepresentations, inaccuracies and making things up – that the New Testament is heavily corroborated by independent sources. He was also featured – as “Dr. Richard Fales” – in the 1983 film “The God Makers”, but there really is no reason to go searching for that one, methinks.

As a student of Fales, Willie Dye is pretty obscure as well, but we have at least found him ranting about the alleged conspiracy by scientists to cover up the Truth of the Bible. He also delves into “the origins of life issues” and examines evidence that proves that design requires a Designer”, and he is apparently in possession of eye-opening physical proof” that the race of ancient giants known in the Old Testament as the Nephilim actually existed as well as a “startling discovery about dinosaurs that challenges the scientific community!” We don’t know the precise nature of the discovery, but we can’t help but notice that he has been “working on vertebrae paleontology and ichnology in Glenrose, Texas, at the Paluxy River Bed.” Oh, yes, the Paluxy River Bed.


Diagnosis: Yes, there are grown-ups who really don’t have the cognitive skills necessary to grasp the distinction between truth and falsehood, or between deception and honesty. It actually seems like these people believe they are helping. Which is … pretty sad.

#1602: Lynda R. Farley

$
0
0
Ok, so this one is probably not a very influential figure, but Lynda R. Farley is so colorful that we can’t just let her be. Farley drew a bit of attention to herself when she was part of a “million” veterans marching on Washington DC (more like a few hundred) to protest Obama in 2013, presenting herself as the “Smoker on Strike” with messages like “George Washington, father of our country & a smoker!” and “the person who first promoted the lie that ‘smoking causes lung cancer’ was Adolf Hitler” (not entirely accurate, but that’s not the main problem with the message), presented in … unusual combinations of colors, fonts and capitalizations – nothing compared to her website, though, which is absolutely amazing (she calls it “the most beautiful pages on the WWW,” and it is hard not to conclude that she really is unable to distinguish between “I say so” and “it is the case”). Even her website cannot compare to her car, the “liberty van” (do look it up), however.

As for the message: Yes, Lynda Farley is a denialist about the negative health effects of smoking. The most important line of argument (it seems) is that she “personally believe every word in the King James Bible. ‘Thou shalt not smoke’ is NOT in there. And, the verses usually quoted about holiness, and the body being God’s temple nowhere refer to smoking or not smoking,” which is probably correct. Meanwhile, she rejects “the anti-smoker’s junk science. And there’s GOOD EVIDENCE that they LIE about the ‘risks’, or at the very least, exaggerate greatly.

One of her own rants is here, and she also links to this, shall we say, “interesting” website of “research”, mostly consisting of the rants by the late Lauren Colby. The basic idea is that you cannot trust science, since most scientists are funded by the powerful anti-smoking industry. Since you cannot trust the scientists, it apparently follows that any beliefs you may have about the issue are equally valid. Farley herself adds that “it seems God created all of us with NICOTINE RECEPTORS IN OUR BRAINS.  And, nicotine is a form of NIACIN – which is a VITAMIN.” So there. She also links to the pro-smoking works of William Campbell Douglass, whom we have encountered before.

Other than that Farley seems predictably enough to promote a variety of wingnut conspiracy theories such as global warming denialism.


Diagnosis: Not very influential or likely to be taken seriously by many, but the kind of lady who simply adds some color to our Encyclopedia, the Internet and wingnut protests. And her main platform is crazy enough to impress even us.

#1603: Thomas Farr

$
0
0
It’s important to understand how deeply ingrained the persecution complex is in the religious right (brief but good discussion here) – the idea that Christians in the US is a minority that everyone else is out to get is utterly delusional, of course, but it is rhetorically pretty effective when it comes to rallying the troops whenever any policy, idea or statement they disagree with can be construed as a direct attack on them (and, by extension, on Jesus).

The perspective is needed to understand the otherwise deranged mission of the organization Open Doors, which is dedicated to “serving persecuted Christians worldwide” with a mission to work in the “world’s most oppressive countries, strengthening Christians to stand strong in the face of persecution and equipping them to shine Christ’s light in these dark places,” since the mission would otherwise have sounded rather reasonable. It isn’t.

In 2011, then, Open Doors issued a pledge calling on presidential candidates to promise to protect the right to employ religious arguments, or religiously-informed moral arguments, when contending for or against laws and policies, such as laws designed to protect the unborn and traditional marriage” in the US and to “nominate to the U.S. federal bench judges who” woud defend that right. Of course, the religious right empoys religious arguments all the time, but what Open Doors has in mind are things like the ruling in the Propositon 8 case, which according to pledge co-author Thomas Farr (the other author is Carl A. Moeller) is precisely an example of how Christians are being persecuted in America. “Religious freedom is in crisis” in the US, according to Farr, since lots of people have the audacity to disagree with Godhim on social issues. So, yes – once again “persecution” means “people, especially lawmakers, disagreeing with them.” And by that definition, there is, of course, plenty of persecution going on in the US. And so it goes.


Diagnosis: It is hard to emphasize strongly enough how abysmally delusional people like Farr actually are. They are also zealous. The combination of delusions and zeal is a common one, but always bad news.

#1604: Sally Faubion

$
0
0
The art of psychic readings have entered the new millennium, as they say, and a quick iTunes search will give you hundreds of numerology apps and thousands of astrology apps. There’s no particular reason to single out the apps produced by Sally Faubion Concepts, but to cover this junk in our Encyclopedia we needed an example and coincidence gave Sally Faubion the honors. Bad karma, I suppose.

Faubion has already given us such marvels of innovation as:
  • Forecast Wheel, a prophetic roulette that rolls out fortunes that are as sophisticated and profound as an average fortune cookie, such as “your financial and social status will improve when you marry;”
  • Meaning of House Numbers, which will apparently give you a house’s prime selling or purchasing price; and
  • Cosmic Mates, which at $3.99 will teach you the “secrets of your personality and destiny” – it’s basically an electronic version of the paper fortunetellers you may or may not have made as a kid, no joke.

Other than that, she has apparently written a book, Motivational Numerology and How Numbers Affect Your Life, which appears to contain a delightful combination of New Age religious fanaticism and corporate newspeak. At least she sums herself up pretty well: “I call myself the Dr. Phil of numerology because I’m so incredibly honest and forthright,” says Faubion.


Diagnosis: Ok, the Dr. Phil comparison might indicate a certain awareness of the level of bullshit she peddles, but we suspect that she is as hilariously and jaw-droppingly oblivious as it demonstrates if taken at face value.

#1605: Bill Fawell

$
0
0
Elect a New Congress is a wingnut super PAC devoted to “restoring liberty” in Congress, with “liberty” understood in a somewhat idiosyncratic way, it seems. It’s founder, Bill Fawell (not “Falwell” – some people apparently miss that), wants to free us not only from the left, but from the Illuminati. And the Illuminati are everywhere. As evidence of their influence, Fawell can point to Madonna’s Super Bowl halftime show in 2012, where the singer wore an Egyptian headdress and was surrounded by male dancers who formed a pyramid – a well-known part of secret Illuminati symbolism. But he feared Beyonce’s halftime show in 2013 would be worse:

If you look at some of Beyonce’s performances … it’s like the military industrial police state,”said Fawell, who also pointed out that she has previously performed surrounded by male dancers in protective helmets: “That’s the subliminal message that will be spreading worldwide because everyone watches the Super Bowl.” (Methinks he overestimates the worldwide popularity of American football, but I don’t think that’s the weakest premise in his reasoning.)

His super PAC doesn’t appear to have been particularly successful, but Fawell has tried to run for Congress himself, among other things as a write-in in Illinois’s 17th district in 2014. He initially announced that he’d be running for the Constitution Party, but found the process of collecting signatures to be prohibitive.

At least he has managed to get himself a slot on Coast to Coast AM, the qualification for which is that you’re a blathering lunatic.


Diagnosis: Blathering lunatic.

#1606: Jeff Fears

$
0
0
Not much by way of notability, perhaps, but this one is both trite and disconcerting at the same time. Jeff Fears is apparently “head of the science department at Salisbury Christian School,” a hardcore creationist, uh, institution. Fears himself believes that “sound science requires no belief in evolution,” but has, it seems, not the faintest idea what either “sound science” or “evolution” actually means. Instead, he pushes a (familiar) bogus distinction between observational science (i.e. book keeping and logistics) and historical science, which requires interpretationin light of … well, faith. The point that allgood scientific theories and hypotheses concern unobserved phenomena, but that you obtain evidence for or against them by deriving predictions about observable phenomena and testing the hypotheses about things that are observable now, is pretty far from Fears’s … “understanding” of science.

But he isn’t done. Fears also laments the perceived prevalence of methodoligcal naturalism – which creationists (and others) have deluded themselves into falsely thinking that modern science is committed to – and points out that, as opposed to modern evolutionists, the “founding fathers of modern science – giants like Copernicus, Galileo, Kepler and Newton – interpreted evidence from a decidedly Judeo-Christian worldview and made what are arguably the most significant scientific discoveries the world has ever known, precisely from that vantage point. They were demonstrably not naturalists.” Well, he isn’t even close to getting any of this, is he?

And the clincher? “[S]ince macroevolution (salmon becoming salamanders) has never been observed [yes, this is Ray Comfort-level idiocy], faith most definitely is required […] Faith is belief in the unobservable. Hence, by definition, acceptance of macroevolution requires an ocean of faith, especially since it is attributed, not to an intelligent deity tinkering with his creation, but rather to random acts of chance.” Whee.


Diagnosis: Moron, but he seems to fancy himself a science teacher of sorts. Sad and scary.

#1607: Randy Featherstone

$
0
0
Randy Featherstone is the manager of KBJS-FM, an affiliate radio station of the Moody Network in East Texas – not a particularly major player, to be sure, but notable for the fact that they, in 2011, canceled David Barton’s Wallbuilders Live radio program. … as any sane manager of a radio station would do, of course. But Featherstone is not sane, and his problem with Barton was not Barton’s dishonesty, pseudo-history, delusional religious fundamentalism, fanatic denialism or bigotry. Rather, Featherstone had a problem with Barton’s sympathetic attitude toward Glenn Beck. “Hey, but that still sounds reasonable,” you might say. Well, yes, but Featherstone’s problem was not that Beck is an idiot, but that Beck is … a Mormon. And Barton, by exhibiting sympathy for Beck, also exhibited a “failure to distinguish between Mormon theology and Christianity.” That is, “when David Barton said it doesn’t matter whether you are a Mormon or a Baptist or a Methodist, we felt we had to do something,” said Featherstone.


Diagnosis: We admit that we don’t know much else about Featherstone and his view of the world. We probably don’t want to know either.

#1608: Bill Federer

$
0
0
William J. “Bill” Federer is the host of the program Faith in History on the TCT Network the radio show The American Minute, affiliated with the World Congress of Families, president of Amerisearch (“a publishing company dedicated to researching America’s noble heritage”), as well as an author of several books with titles like America’s God and Country Encyclopedia of Quotations, The Ten Commandments and Their Influence on American Law, Three Secular Reasons Why America Should Be Under God and What Every American Needs to Know About the Quran: A History of Islam and the United States. Federer is, in other words, one of the central promoters of the idea of The United States As a Christian Nation, and that Christians are currently being persecuted (tax exemption rules for churches are like Nazi Germany, for instance). Like David Barton, Federer is also a pseudo-historian (he has a degree in accounting), and though he hasn’t achieved quite the fame of Barton, he is known for sharing Barton’s aptitude for facts, accuracy, honesty, accountability and general reasoning skills. He is also a conspiracy theorist, signatory to the Manhattan Declaration and madman.

So, for instance, Federer thinks that the “atheist homosexual gay agenda movement” will move America “into an Islamic future” complete with mythical Sharia law “no-go zones”. And the conspiracy is governed from the very top. Federer thinks that the Arab Spring was designed by evil forces who wanted to create a surge in Muslim refugees who would then settle in the U.S. in order to establish Islamic “sleeper cells.” These cells will then soon “get a signal to have Ferguson riots in malls across America,” thereby giving Obama the justification to “restore order” by setting up a “militarized dictatorship.” And then, Federer warns, Obama could follow in the footsteps of Joseph Stalin, Mao Zedong and Pol Pot and kill millions of Christians. (As his source, Federer cited Avi Lipkin – we’ll cover him in due course – who heard from his wife, who heard from an unspecified Arabic-language broadcast). He has previously worried that atheists would kill millions of Christians if they could take over the military; in other words, people he disagree with on theological and/or political issues – libruls, atheists, Muslims, gays and the American government – are secretly working together, and their goal is to kill him, which tells you quite a bit about the mindset of people like Bill Federer. How is it supposed to work? Well, according to Federer, Europe “went from a Judeo-Christian past into a neutral-secular-gay-agenda present and now it’s going into an Islamic future;” hence, it is clear that “the sexual confusion agenda is simply a transition phase” that will soon “be taken over by Islam.” The process by which LGBT equality is leading to Islamic dominion is already in full effect in the military, where Christians have been forced into the closet by the fact that gays are allowed to serve, and proselytizing classes on Islam (he may be referring to classes on Islamic culture for soldiers who are going to be stationed in Muslim countries and who are expected to interact with the civilian population) are already winning numerous converts.

While evidence for such a conspiracy does not exist, Federer sees it everywhere. For instance, the 2006 scandal involving Ted Haggard was timed to help Democrats retake Congress, and the subprime mortgage crisis was orchestrated to stop the momentum the McCain campaign had gained by choosing Sarah Palin as its running mate. And predictably, Federer thinks that Benghazi was all part of a plan hatched by Obama and Hillary Clinton to spread Sharia law around the world. It is also all about Saul Alinsky, of course. In particular, Clinton was “using Alinsky tactics” in her response to the attack to engender a “hurried rush for Americans to give up their free speech rights” and to impose Sharia law: “So the question is was Benghazi just inept actions by our government, was it something to put down negative speech that could affect the President’s reelection campaign or was it an Alinsky tactic to push an agenda to forbid free speech insulting Islam,” asked Federer, but it wasn’t really a question: “We’re talking about a global goal of establishing Sharia law and we came very, very close to it happening right after the Benghazi attempt with this effort to forbid free speech insulting Islam.” He didn’t give any details on the latter claim. Before the 2012 election, Federer also speculated (and promptly took to be established) that the Obama administration would intentionally bring about war between Iran and Israel which Obama could use as a pretext to take control of the radio, TV and internet … or he might fake a plot on his life that can be blamed on the Tea Party in the manner of Stalin.

As is to be expected, Federer is a creationist, and has criticized the theory of evolution for Darwin’s alleged racist motivations, which would be irrelevant to the validity of the theory even if the speculations were true, which they aren’t. But according to Federer, “Darwin is best known for the theory of evolution, arguing that all men are not equal because some are more evolved,” an assertion that has nothing to do with anything remotely connected to evolution – though to Federer, the idea that some humans are more evolved than others “influenced the Dred Scott Case,” which took place three years before the publication of The Origin of Species and fifteen years before The Descent of Man. Here is Federer on the Scopes trial. It’s … a pretty feeble smearing attempt, even for a wingnut hack.

Federer has appeared in numerous conspiracy documentaries, like Truth that Transforms, which was released to coincide with the Titanic anniversary and set out to expose the “iceberg” or the “radical homosexual agenda”.


Diagnosis: A poor man’s David Barton; a hack with little or no aptitude for reason, honesty, accuracy or facts. Even so, he has managed to become an influential voice among certain rightwing groups, which tells you a bit about those groups. Dangerous.

#1609: Rebecca Ferguson

$
0
0
The Chalkboard Campaign: We Need to Talk is a video that in 2012 went viral in the anti-vaccine horde and was generally treated there as if it provided solid evidence that vaccines are unsafe. Of course, it did no such thing, and was instead just a predictable collection of pseudoscience and misinformation. It’s creator, Rebecca Ferguson, is a board member of VaxTruth.org and a mother who claims to have “recovered” her daughter Caroline using all manner of “biomedical” pseudoscience. The video is not her first attempt. She has previously made videos about her daughters consisting of very straightforward examples of confusing correlation and causation: Blaming vaccines for her daughter’s autism, and for every sign of improvement, such as developing language and so on, simply assuming that none of these developments would have happened without the antivirals, gluten-free diet, chelation therapy, hyperbaric oxygen chambers and homeopathic remedies her poor daughter was subjected to at the time.

As for the Chalkboard Campaign, Ferguson appears to have accepted the myth of an autism epidemic, and the video is guided by the question: “What is causing all the neurological disorders?” To answer that, Ferguson claims that “we dug deep into the science,” but she evidently avoided science like the plague for the purposes of creating the video, relying instead on rants by infamous cranks like Russell Blaylock, Ginger Taylor and Andreas Moritz, who thinks that cancer is the “wisdom” of the body and that chemotherapy doesn’t work – there is, shall we say, a dearth of peer-reviewed, published literature among her sources. Then there are some standard tricks, like providing a scary-sounding (to the chemically illiterate) list of vaccine ingredients. All of it leads up to an impressive string of ridiculous, pseudoscientific conclusions. So Ferguson claims that vaccines decrease immune reactivity to viruses and increase immune reactivity to allergens (apparently that one comes from Moritz), and that “even the smallest amounts of heavy metals and toxins in vaccines” can “bypass all natural defenses” because they’re injected directly into the body (a common misunderstanding among antivaxx activists), which can apparently lead to something she calls “gut-brain encephalopathy.” Real doctors won’t tell you this, of course, since they are just “pharma shills”; no, for the truth you need to locate the Internet blogs of crazyconspiracy theorists like Andreas Moritz. And then she claims that “there has never been a single study of the current vaccine schedule,” which, of course, is tested every time a new childhood vaccine is introduced: She ignores that fact, of course, since they aren’t the kind of study the antivaxxers want; they putatively want epidemiological studies looking at vaccinated vs. unvaccinated populations. Which exist. But you know: Those studies don’t prove what Ferguson already “knows” is true, and therefore don’t count.


Diagnosis: Apparently she’s talking primarily to the already converted – her claims are presumably sufficiently stupid and superficial to prevent any widespread impact – but attitudes and delusions like Ferguson’s are still frightening and likely to cause real harm. So: dangerous.

#1610: John Ferrer, Lori McKeeman et al.

$
0
0
Ok, so these are not exactly leaders of the anti-science movements, but they are worth a mention nonetheless, as representatives of what is probably a rather large number of teachers, administrators and suchlike who make their own local efforts to save souls from science, truth and reason and deliver them to fervent religious fundamentalism. John Ferrer and Lori McKeeman are two among a group of people (the rest are unnamed or named only by pseudonym) who spent 10 days in Seattle at the Discovery Institute’s summer seminar learning about intelligent design in 2013.

Of course, according to the Discovery Institute intelligent design is science, not religion, but funnily enough that doesn’t seem to have registered with the participants (and was certainly not a motivation for attending). Ferrer, who has a Ph.D. in philosophy of religion “sees himself as an evangelist for the redemption of universities,” and believes Christians (i.e. Taliban-fundie Christians) need to work hard be the best students in the classroom to enter top-notch grad programs and places of influence in politics, business, and academia. And once they are professors or college presidents, they have the power to change what is taught to the country’s future leaders. Not unlike the seven mountains ideology, in fact. So for Ferrer, intelligent design has everything to do with the political advancement of fundamentalist religion.

Lori McKeeman, on the other hand, is a, uh, “science” teacher at The Potter’s School, an online fundamentalist school targeted at homeschoolers and missionary and military families. According to herself, she coaches students through experiments such extracting DNA from peas and fruit, and then uses science to demonstrate the accuracy of the Bible; for instance hyssop, a cleansing agent mentioned in the Bible, does in fact contain thymol, which is an antiseptic actually used in mouthwash. Impressive.


Diagnosis: Yes, these kind of people are actually in a position of power of children in the US. And, true to the tenets of the intelligent design creationist movement, they are determined to win the battle over science by outreach and politics and avoiding doing any science whatsoever.
Viewing all 2331 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>