Quantcast
Channel: Encyclopedia of American Loons
Viewing all 2331 articles
Browse latest View live

#1611: Lee Finkle et al.

$
0
0
John L. Fielder, author of the Handbook of Nature Cure Volume One: Nature Cure vs. Medical Science, the first chapter of which is “That Fallacious Germ Theory”, is Australian. Lee Finkle, however, hails from Wisconsin, but doesn’t seem to have had any contact with anywhere in reality for a long time. Finkle is a spokesperson for the Pleiadians. The Pleiadians are from the star system called the Pleiades. Whereas “[t]he Lyrans from Lyra are our common ancestors.” Finkle knows this because they told her. They also told her the history of their race and of Earth, which sounds a bit like a mishmash of Star Trek and Battlestar Galactica; apparently the Pleiadians discovered the Earth (which, by the way, is 626 billion years old) around 225,000 B.C. and mixed with the people here, who were apparently already of alien descent, and – with the permission of The Galactic Federation, no less – started to create civilizations. They left in about 10 AD, but left behind Jesus, whose lineage were part Pleiadian and who “was a very evolved soul”. For good measure, Finkle has also predicted that “as Earth enters the Photon Band by year 2000, the Pleiadians are going to help bring all humans on Earth into the light.” We are not sure whether 2000 left her disappointed or whether she finally received the help she craved.

Apparently Finkle is associated with Alienworlds, whatever that is, but we encountered her (and rants about the same stuff by one Billy Meier) at something called the Burlington UFO Center. Their webpage is here, and it’s pretty amazing. We couldn’t resist clicking on “Turn Your Television Set into a UFO Detector. Click Here for Instructions,” which took us to an even more amazing page featuring one Mary Sutherland, who, among very many other things, claims to have found Atlantis in Kentucky and promises you an “Invisible Man caught on camera, crossing the road” – an invisible green man, in fact (being both invisible and green (and catchable on camera) is pretty amazing in itself) – that Mary encountered in the form of a Thunderbird after having been telepathically told by Native Americans to do a spiral dance. But the BUC site itself really contains an almost endless supply of good information. Did you know that “the movie PREDATOR was based off a real encounter”? Or that cattle mutilations “serve a purpose for the aliens,” namely that they “have a genetic disorder in that their digestive system is atrophied and non-functional” and that they use the tissue they “extract” from cattle instead? Neither did we. Nor, for that matter, do the people at Burlington UFO center, but that is a different matter.


Diagnosis: It really is an amazing website, and will definitely make you both a little happy and a little sad at the same time. Oh, and Lee Finkle probably needs some attention, too.

#1612: Clayton Fiscus

$
0
0
Clayton Fiscus has been a member of the Montana House of Representatives, serving the 46th District, since 2013, and has already managed to put his stamp on a group already characterized by rank insanity. Already before he got in he drafted a bill that would “[r]equire public schools to teach intelligent design along with evolution,” apparently oblivious to the legal problems that would engender. It died pretty quickly, and one almost pities Fiscus’s attempts to defend his pseudoscience and denialism against the experts during the committee hearing. Here and here are some support letters.

But did he learnanything? Not much at least. In 2015 he was at it again, this time with an academic freedom bill constructed according to the recommendations of the Discovery Institute, that would would encourage high school teachers to present evolutionary biology as a disputed theory and protect those who teach creationism in the classroom, all to “emphasize critical thinking,” as he called it. It died as well, but we don’t for a moment think he’s given up.


Diagnosis: Another inhofely dim bulb in a state legislature. While his efforts on behalf of pseudoscience have failed thus, he is in a position of some power (there’s lots of crazies in the Montana legislature, after all), which is a cause for concern.

#1613: James Fitzgerald

$
0
0
Oh, yeah: The end. It’s near again. It’s been a while since we’ve seen one of these in the wild. Perhaps it’s because they are these days rather hired by certain types of wingnut media, such as the WND, to talk about blood moons or sell survivalist gear. James Fitzgerald got one of WND’s trademark advertisments-disguised-as-opinion-columns after having written a book, The 9/11 Prophecy, which claims that 9/11 was the beginning of the last days. His argument is primarily that “Jesus specifically taught that his followers would be able to recognize this period once it began,” and he is currently recognizing it and is a follower of Jesus. Yes, the argument has some shortcomings, as does his interpretation of Bible verses, but you know. Thanks for playing, James.


Diagnosis: Tinfoil hat idiot. Probably harmless to anyone but those who love and care about him.

#1614: Tom Flannery

$
0
0
Misology is an important part of wingnuttery, especially religiously motivated wingnuttery, and a fine example is the WND, which publishes the works of professional hater of knowledge, science and reason Tom Flannery. Flannery stands up to what he sees as “brain-dead intellectuals”, and has a superpower that will help him do so: citing Bible verses.

Flannery is, of course, a creationist, and appears to think that Aquinas’s arguments refuted Hume’s skepticism and therefore contemporary Darwinists are fools. Ok, he’s got some other arguments as well (you may have heard them before), for instance the following ones, reported in his review of the Ham-Nye debate for the WND where he declared Ken Ham the obvious winner (mostly due to arguments Flannery decided to add that Ham didn’t in fact use):

-       Scienstists are dishonest since they mix up what creationists distinguish as observational and historical science, a distinction that makes no sense whatsoever if you understand, you know, the basics of scientific thinking.
-       Evolution is racist, which is proven by the fact that Darwin himself refers to “the preservation of the favoured races”. (Oh, no – Flannery has never so much as read any Darwin. Why would he?)
-       There are no missing links”, and the relatively few “big discoveries” have all “eventually been reclassified or exposed as hoaxes”.
-       And for the grand finale: “It’s no wonder that later in his life Darwin dismissed his theories about molecules-to-man evolution as ‘the unformed ideas of my youth.’” Even Answers in Genesis thinks creationists should avoid using that one to avoid obviously looking like the uninformed clowns they are.

So that gives you an idea about the quality of Flannery’s writings. The conclusion? Biology, geology and astronomy are pseudoscience invented to challenge the Bible; “[t]rue science contradicts Darwinian evolution across the board,” writes Flannery in a review of the Broadway play “Grace”, which he didn’t like. Truth, reason and accuracy are just tenets of intellectual snobbery, after all.

His arguments for why the United States is a Christian Nation would perhaps have made even David Barton blush. Did you for instance know that “Christopher Columbus, after all, became convinced that the world was round after reading a verse of Scripture from the book of Isaiah,” the relevance of which would be unclear even if it were true, which of course it isn’t? But according to Flannery, the Founding Fathers were as influenced by religion as Columbus and himself; indeed, according to Flannery, John Adams understood that without divine intervention from the God of the Bible there would have been no America (nope, he did not claim that) and that his rallying cry during the revolutionary war was “No king but King Jesus” (absolute nonsense), that the Declaration of Independence specifically discusses “Biblical violations”, that “Washington and Alexander Hamilton said they based the idea for America’s separation of powers upon the Bible verse Jeremiah 17:9” (nope, they didn’t), and so on. It’s all discussed here. Lying for Jesus never was more dishonest than this.


Diagnosis: Hatred of knowledge and those who possess it is nothing new at the WND. Flannery apparently doesn’t much care for truth either. Which is nothing new either, I suppose. Crazy denialist, but he seems to be preaching primarily to the choir.

#1615: John Fleming

$
0
0
John Calvin Fleming, Jr. is a U.S. Representative for Louisiana’s 4th congressional district since 2009 and John-Birch-society-style conspiracy theorist. In particular, Fleming thinks that the United Nations is in a conspiracy against America. The global UN Arms Trade Treaty, which will restrict the sale of arms to countries and groups that commit war crimes and other atrocities, is by Fleming for instance interpreted as an attempt by the left to weaken and ultimately “repeal” the Second Amendment. He also cited discredited rightwing conspiracies concerning the treaty to support his claims, and concluded by speculating that the UN may make it illegal for parents to spank their children. And the UN is in cohorts with libruls, who are using immigrants (who according to Fleming are coming to America to “enjoy free healthcare” and “enjoy welfare”) as part of a “grand plan for the Democrat [sic] Party to make this nation into a single party state” and thereby institute tyranny. One of the most important means they have is to make it easier to commit voter fraud, and Democrats are deliberately using immigrants who are ineligible to vote to gain power: “We know they come from cultures that look to government for solutions and so the Democrat [sic] Party knows this and they know that if they can’t win elections using American citizens, this is a good way to go around that.Obamais also fomenting racial tensions, apparently, in order to divide America. And yes, Fleming does have power. He is in Congress.

Most importantly, however, there is an atheist conspiracy to persecute Christians in the US. And there really are concerted efforts by libruls to impose a Satanicatheist worldview on America in order to destroy it: “We have two competing world views here and there is no way that we can reach across the aisle – one is going to have to win. We are either going to go down the socialist road and become like western Europe and create, I guess really a godless society, an atheist society. Or we’re going to continue down the other pathway where we believe in freedom of speech, individual liberties and that we remain a Christian nation. So we’re going to have to win that battle.” And accordingly, any kind of attempt to compromise for the sake of the country is treason. In particular, Fleming has sponsored several bills to shut down religious freedom in the military (of course, Fleming claims they do the opposite, but that is because he interprets “religious freedom” as being the freedom of those who agree with him to shut down those who don’t.) Obama, on the other hand, doesn’t care or do anything about the persecution of Christians (well, he does something, but those are just “political move[s]), but rather follows – you guessed it – the UN, which is not only doing nothing, but “have really done a lot to do just the opposite of that, that in fact they tend to propagate liberal ideas and climate change and these kind of things in the absence of what is really happening around the world,” namely Christian persecution.

Of course, the direct target of those religious freedom bills are gays, who according to Fleming are– with the deliberate support of the government – covertly pushing atheism and socialism. Fleming’s opposition to gay marriages rests on bigotry in part on his fear that the institution may be abused by people entering into sham gay marriages. As opposed to sham heterosexual marriages. Which Fleming admits exist, but sham gay marriages are worse. Why? Well, you know why: Because they would be sham gay marriages. Homosexuals, you know. Also, national security.

Another major point of interest for Fleming is the war on drugs, and he has offered some rather (ridiculously) silly arguments for why the war needs to continue, including think about “our beloved veterans.

Fleming is also a supporter of hydraulic fracking, which is his prerogative. But some of his rather novel arguments are interesting, for instance his response to the question of whether fracking has caused any deaths or serious injury to humans by pointing out that the bankruptcy of Solyndra has “harmed more people” than hydraulic fracturing.

In 2011 Fleming fell for the now rather famous Onion article “Planned Parenthood Opens $8-billion Abortionplex”.


Diagnosis: Religious fanatic and conspiracy theorist. Just what certain morons think the US needs more of. Extremely dangerous.

#1616: Craig Douglas Fleshman

$
0
0
A.k.a. Pastor Paul Revere [oh, boy]

To the right of the Tea Party you will find the sovereign citizen movements, which includes he Embassy of Heaven church in Oregon led by Craig Douglas Fleshman. Fleshman, who will only answer to the name “Paul Revere”, does not have a driver’s license or pay taxes. This is because he does not recognize the authority of the State of Oregon or the United States of America. Fleshman answers only to God, and he and his followers are literally citizens of the Kingdom of Heaven; no secular government has any power over him.

According to his website “grownups have been tricked into obeying the laws of humbugs, rather than the laws of God,” and he provides advice and warnings about why and how you can disobey such “humbugs” – though it will admittedly land you in jail: “If you have given your allegiance to Jesus Christ, and you live your beliefs, you will go to jail,” says Fleshman (who has been there himself). That is because you are persecuted. Like his own group was in 1997, when Sheriff’s Deputies raided the group’s property and seized it for non-payment of taxes. Fleshman insisted the taxes were not owed because the property was “a separate nation,” or more precisely an embassy of the Kingdom of Heaven, and that in seizing the properties “the county has declared war on the saints.” As for worldly governments, the state is the Antichrist, and the courts are the Halls of Satan: “The court is Satan’s religion carried on by the state,” says Fleshman: “There is a reason why everyone has an attorney, why the judge wears a black robe. It is part of their satanic worship.

Fleshman’s organization issues its own identity documents, including passports and drivers licenses, business licenses, motor vehicle title certificates and license plates (your car is thereby “licensed by Heaven”). Some of his followers in Minnesota predictably got in trouble for convincing their followers to get a faith-based “Certificate of Self-Insurance” instead of regular car insurance. Fleshman responded by claiming not to sell insurance, and that “[w]e don’t operate in Minnesota ... We operate in the Kingdom of Heaven,” which is not the kind of thing to say if you wish to impress the courts.

Among people associated with the organization is Glen Stoll, who “falsely hold[s] himself out to be a ‘lawyer’ and claims to have spent considerable time studying the tax laws” but who “is not a member of or licensed with any state or federal bar.” Stoll used to represent Kent Hovind, an easy target for sovereign citizen drivel, who ended up claiming that all of his income belonged to God and that the federal government had no authority over him, and that he therefore didn’t have to pay taxes. Which turned out not to be such a good idea.


Diagnosis: Delusional fundie who actually seems to have some influence, which is pretty mind-boggling. Even if he is, according to himself, not a citizen (though, of course, residenceis sufficient for tax duties), at least the brand of lunacy he professes seems to be thoroughly American.

#1617: Steve Forbes

$
0
0
I don’t know whether it is reassuring or not to see that the candidates in the Republican primaries for the 2000 election contained the same kind of moronic clowns and Taliban fundies as they do today. One of the idiots running back then was Steve Forbes. Yes, that Steve Forbes, the publishing executive and editor-in-chief of business magazine Forbes. He also ran in 1996.

The campaign was not very successful, despite the money Forbes raised (e.g. by selling some of his Forbes Inc. voting shares), but what interests us is his platform. Oh, there were the standard issues: flat tax (really a regressive tax in Forbes’s case) and opposition to most government regulation of the environment, drug legalization, same-sex marriage and the UN, support for school prayers and combatting juvenile crime with “school morality”, and a promise to no longer donate money to Princeton University due to its hiring of philosopher Peter Singer because Singer views personhood as being limited to sentient beings (yeah, Forbes missed the nuances of that issue). One interesting detail about his plan, however, was his platform on education: “More Bible; less evolution”. One might be inclined to think there is a link between that one and the fact that Forbes Magazine has had an annoying tendency to “give equal time” to mindrotting cargo cult science when discussing scientific issues, though the Forbes site is, in fairness, an aggregator site, and Forbes himself probably has somewhat limited control over what gets published there.

Forbes also denied that there were any evidence that CO2causes global warming, which even in 2000 was a pretty stupid position. We are not aware of him changing his mind. Making sure he ticks all the usual wingnut science denial boxes, Forbes has also promoted the usual DDT ban myths, backed up by the usual PRATTs. He is also a member of the board of trustees of the Heritage Foundation.


Diagnosis: His 2000 platform seems at least to be inspired by countries Forbes would never mention as sources of inspiration, and the guy himself seems to have bought into all the standard conspiracy theories and religiously fundamentalist anti-science attitudes that often come with wingnuttery. Still pretty influential in Tea Party circles, it seems.

#1618: Lawrence Ford

$
0
0
Lawrence Ford is the former Director of Communication for the Institute for Creation Research and editor of their magazine Acts & Fact (he wrote the editor’s column, for instance, a job now done by one Jayme Durant) and other ICR publications. Ford was also in charge of the ICR’s various promotion efforts in social media, including (it seems) both the Twitter and the Facebook account for the ICR. It is unclear why he eventually left the ICR, but he seems to have done so at some point in 2012.

To be honest, most of his stuff seem to have consisted primarily of parroting the conclusions and errors of other ICR-affiliated writers. Like some of his fellow fundies, he does appear to think that listening to scientists – and in particular, scientists disseminating the theory of evolution to others – will land you in hell, for “[t]he basic conflict of the ages is between the two worldviews of evolutionism versus creationism,” as the late Henry Morris used to say. Ford also thinks that scientists and scientific institutions like the Smithsonian are persecuting Christian scientists by failing to promote creationism, which even according to him is based on a dogmatic reading of the Bible and not on the deceptive testing-and-modifying-hypotheses-all-the-time approach favored by science.


Diagnosis: Until recently a relatively powerful force in the creationist movement as an administrator and organizator, even though he doesn’t seem to have made many, uh, science-related contributions to the efforts. We have no idea what he’s up to now that his tenure with the ICR appears to be up, however.

#1619: Rhonda Forlow

$
0
0
Associates of last entry’s Lawrence Ford, Rhonda Forlow and her husband Brad are two cranks affiliated with the Institute of Creation Research (ICR) (formerly, in fact: Currently they are doing missionary work trying to convert people to Taliban-style fundamentalism; Rhonda Forlow has earlier described her encounters with hindus and Buddhists in British Columbia and how she “arrived home exhausted and broken by these individuals’ misguided quest for knowledge and truth in an extremely tolerant society,” so there is clearly some work to do.)

Rhonda Forlow used to be in charge of the ICR’s K-12 blog entitled Science Education Essentials. She does, indeed, possess a PhD in Education, specializing in the “education of students with learning disabilities, emotional disturbance, and mental retardation,” but we’ll leave it at that. She doesn’t understand science, and her posts were written under the standard creationist delusion that there is a sharp distinction between “historical” and “observational” sciences, where questions about the origin of life and the universe would belong to the former and thus not “really” be science. As anyone with a cursory knowledge of how scientific investigations work (you know: hypothesis forming, derivation of testable predictions, testing) that distinction is, to put it mildly, bogus. 

Though nominally aimed at homeschoolers, Forlow seems to have had a wider audience of teachers in mind. Here is a good summary of her pedagogical suggestions. It’s … tough reading if you care for truth, honesty and accuracy, but her forays into cryptozoology are at least entertaining: “We are uncertain if dinosaurs still live today. If any do, it would be in very remote and secretive locations. The latest sighting claims have come from the Likouala swamp in Congo, and from a remote island in Indonesia. Here is what we do know from past history: Records of dragon slayings, or dinosaur encounters, in mainland Europe ended in the Middle Ages. Similar records in Britain ended in about the 1700s.” You do the math (but “Jesus” is always an acceptable answer).

The blog, which closed in late 2012, is, if anything, a good example of one of the tensions any pseudoscientific enterprise will eventually have to face: Are they persecuted by scientists, or do scientists (at least “more and more” of them) “agree” with their conclusions? Forlow, at least, often pretended that her conclusions were in line with the conclusions of ordinary scientists, which is rather desperately delusional but of course easily explained by the fact that she didn’t have the faintest idea about science, much less biology, even much less evolutionary biology, or what real scientists are up to.

Brad Forlow, her husband, has a Ph.D. in chemical engineering and used to be the Associate Science Editor at the ICR, serving on their “life science research team”. In that role he has at least written a number of pamphlets for the ICR.

Diagnosis: Another one who’s doing her best (worst) to undermine children’s aptitude for reality, science and reason. To the extent that she’s using a “science agrees with me” gambit, it’s at least easily exposed as deceptive even by those who have been heavily sheltered from reality. Still, her overall contribution to humanity is definitely not benevolent.   

#1620: Steve Foss

$
0
0
You were probably aware of this, but among the numerous churches and congregations in the US there is some … seriously crazy stuff going on. And I am sure that there are plenty of people like Steve Foss, senior pastor of Upper Room Church in Keller, Texas, doing their things. He’ll serve as an example. Republic of Gilead posted a partial transcript of a sermon he delivered at the 2012 Deliver Us from Evil conference; the topic was the “assault against Christianity and the church in America. Through music, our schools, government, and even in the church, the Devil has been unleashing corruption and deception to try and steal the church’s power in America, and in the world.” (Keep in mind that Foss’s speech was interspersed with glossolalia).

Foss began by claiming that archaeological evidence supported the existence of nephilim, who were 30 feet tall beings worshipped as gods by the ancients because of their knowledge of heaven, science, and technology. After being destroyed in the Flood, they became demons who are now looking for bodies to possess. And they are in particular targeting celebrities in the entertainment industry, who have proved to be willing victims: “You know Madonna? She has druid priests in the recording studio, summoning spirits so she can sing her song. Now I got a question for you. If they’re summoning those spirits in order to perform, what do you think’s coming out through the music?” If you care for your kids, you don’t want them listening to body-possessing zombies of 30-foot man-angel hybrids, do you? Justin Bieber, too: “He don’t sing that good! He ain’t all that good-looking! ... You got little girls passing out. It’s a worshipping spirit. Are you all hearing me? What they did with Michael Jackson. It is what the enemy ultimately wants. He wants to steal the worship of God. He wants to be worshipped.” And whenever anyone wants to be worshipped, there’s a demon behind it.

Then he praised the plagues God sent to Egypt, especially the killing of the first-born: “The firstborn of Pharaoh was considered – not only were they considered divinity, but they were considered to be of divine birth. So the firstborn son was a god, so God killed their god! [at this point his audience went wild with applause] Come on, y’all hear me. God killed their god.” The moral principle seems to be that if x loves y very much, then it is OK (obligatory, in fact) to kill y because strong love takes worship away from God. Good to know.

Then he turned to the UN: “Don’t you think for one second the U.N. has any bit of good in it. There is nothing good in the United Nations. It is ruled and controlled by demonic forces that are trying to bring about a one world government system ... Why do you think they hate Israel? And they hate Christians. Don’t you think one thing about it. You know, they just tried to pass a treaty and get America to sign a treaty that would literally make homeschooling illegal. And you could have foreign troops come in, foreign police forces and officials come in, and U.N. officials come in, and actually arrest American citizens on American soil.” Obama is part of it: By decree of the UN he is going “to put a tax on the Internet [he seems to be referring to this; accuracy isn’t Foss’s strong suit]. They’re going to put a tax on American travel. Why? Because they want to redistribute the wealth. To take the money from America and put it overseas. One of them is going to majorly restrict guns in America. We’re going to submit it to the U.N.” He also targeted some esoteric small organizations and New Age groups and used increasing social disapproval of corporal punishment as evidence of the waning authority of the church: “In a lot of places, you can’t even spank anymore. Man, I believe the Bible. Beat ‘em, so they shall not die. You know, people say spare the rod, spoil the child. That’s not what the Bible says. The Bible says spare the rod, you hate your child.

Finally, to round it all up, Foss addressed the gay agenda, which caused President Obama to release an evil spirit, one of the nephilim, who is currently making people think that those who advocate the execution of homosexuals are bigots.


Diagnosis: Thing is: People like this run their churches and tend to their flocks and help build communities around the US. The people regularly attending the shit Foss delivers are, for all I know, otherwise normal people – who still listen. I leave it as an exercise to figure out how to reason with them.

#1621: Darryl Foster

$
0
0
Even more anti-gay lunacy, this time from DL Foster, who is purportedly ex-gay (as recounted in his semiautubiographical Touching A Dead Man: One Man’s Explosive Story of Deliverance from Homosexuality) and is at least the founder and executive director of Witness Freedom Ministries, an outreach ministry that seeks to help people change their sexual orientation and refrain from same-sex relationships. He has also been associated with Exodus International, as well as with the Constitution Party.

Foster is, however, probably most familiar for his Gay Christian Movement Watch, a blog site that tries to draw attention to the “gay christian movement”. According to Foster, being gay and Christian is “blackface”. Meanwhile, he compares himself to Harriet Tubman because of his efforts on behalf of the ex-gay movement and anti-gay abolitionist campaigns (no, he makes no sense whatsoever), as well as to Jesus Christ. Accord to Foster “gay activists” of all races are like white slave owners (that’s from Foster comparing himself to Frederick Douglass) with “their lies, imtimidation [sic], violence, ridicule and unjust laws”, and people criticizing him, such as rightwingwatch, are like the slave catchers trying to bring ex-gays back to the gay plantation by exposing his work and “making sure the massahs and slave catchers are being kept abreast of my writings.” Here is an example of Foster engaging with critics. Yes, Foster’s writing and reasoning do exhibit a certain personal touch. We can’t deny that.

Given his premises, it is hardly surprising to find him arguing that the US will once again become “the land of the free” when we criminalize homosexuality. The US has lost that position to Russia, which is currently the “crown jewel” of deranged bigotry the freedom fighters for its “series of laws that literally enraged the homosexual world” (he doubted the US would even survive a repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell). Behind everything is Satan, of course, who is convincing people that they were born gay, and who keeps sucking those who escape, the ex-gays, back in (yes, the situation is sad, but Foster’s inability to connect the dots is also pretty amazing).

He has also called for the arrest of Dan Savage, in virtue of him being the “creator of the so-called anti-bullying It Gets Better charade,” which Foster doesn’t like: Savage is responsible for giving gay teens “false promises” since people like Foster are going to continue to do their best to make sure that it doesn’t get better. With regard to prohibitions on reparative therapy Foster has likened supporters of such bans to the Ku Klux Klan and said that prohibitions on ex-gay therapy for minors would prevent survivors of sexual abuse “from getting much needed counseling” and encourage “suicidal” thoughts.

Foster’s attitude toward evidence is (not really) unusual. When Janet Boynes made up the claim that 80-85% women “struggling with homosexuality” have been victims of rape in the past, Foster agreed; and when it was pointed out that Boynes had just made up the figure, he concluded that “absent hard data from either side of the debate, I choose to believe” that the real figure is in that ballpark – and that lesbian activists agree with him: Having noticed that some people are addressing the pervasiveness of the problem of sexual assault toward lesbians (and all women), Foster also “choose[s] to believe” that they mean that 80-85% of lesbians have been victims of rape; hence, they agree with him. So that settles that.

He should not be confused with another fundamentalist loon, David Kyle Foster, although their views seem to overlap and they have even worked together on the documentary “Such Were Some of You”, aimed at the Sunday school market and intended to encourage impressionable people to consider “leaving homosexuality,” reject the “gay lifestyle”, and call out those who don’t (other contributing ex-gay activists were Anne Paulk, Linda Jernigan, Jeff Johnston, Robert Gagnon and Michael Brown).


Diagnosis: Hateful like Peter LaBarbera, but arguably in possession of even weaker reasoning skills, which he tries to make up for with more hatred. Dangerous.

#1622: Marshall Foster

$
0
0
Foster, the way he appeared what
appears to be some decades ago.
Marshall Foster is an R.J. Rushdoony fan and Christian Reconstructionist. He is the founder of the World History Institute (previously the Mayflower Institute), an educational (propaganda) foundation that tries to teach us about the Biblical and historical foundations of liberty. So, not liberty. And the history part is pretty revisionist to make it fit their agenda, too – Foster appears to be a committed fan of the kind of pseudohistory promoted by e.g. David Barton.

Foster was for instance co-producer for Kirk Cameron’s movie Monumental, which sought to establish that America is a Christian nation by consulting David Barton and Gary DeMar and arguing that the original pilgrims from the 17th century were religious fundamentalists; therefore the Founding Fathers were; therefore America should be a theocracy. That argument is pretty representative for the kind of stuff Foster is into; he advocates abolishing public schools (rather obvious, given the kind of evidence and reasoning he apparently thinks we ought to be impressed by) and to return to the Bible as the foundation for all aspects of society.

As a deranged fundamentalist Foster also nourishes a couple of pet fundamentalist peeves. Harry Potter, for instance. Foster doesn’t like Harry Potter. Indeed, Foster is scared of Harry Potter, and the Harry Potter theme park in Orlando where, according to Foster, “[m]illions of people each year will be taught at this theme park how to become witches, cast spells, conjure up spirits, and ride brooms.” You know, Foster, Harry Potter isn’t really real, and people cannot really ride on broomsticks and so on. Then again, Foster is on the advisory board of the National Council on Bible Curriculum in Public Schools, so his difficulties with distinguishing fiction from reality aren’t particularly surprising: The Bible, after all, “emphatically forbids witchcraft (Ex. 22:18), wizardry (Deut. 18:10-11), enchantments (Is. 47:9-12), and divination (Ezek. 21:21).” Here he weighs in on the Sandy Hook shootings; exasperated, Foster rejects all the psychological explanations or “imbalance of chemical enzymes,” and concludes instead that the tragedy was due to Lanza’s “sin nature”. Which isn’t much of an explanation even if true. Not that Foster would be able to distinguish an explanation from incoherent lunatic ravings if his life depended on it. But the upshot is, as always, that we need to get the Bible back in public schools.


Diagnosis: Deranged madman who seems to have some followers among the more lunatic fringes of fundamentalism. Stay well clear of this one.

#1623: Janice Fountaine

$
0
0
Janice Fountaine is a nut who achieved a modicum of local fame when she attempted to run for state senator in Maryland in 2014. Fountaine is a self-declared prophet of God, and her platform reflected the ideas that usually comes with assuming this kind of view of yourself. For instance, Fountaine denounces masturbation as being an act orchestrated by Satan as part of his warfare strategies for the endtimes:

The practice of homosexuality and self-pleasure, are age old systems, being recharged and reorganized for end-time warfare. It is being orchestrated from the diabolical realms of the supernatural and manifested on earth, with the overall intention, to silence the church forever. These actions, by satan, is (sic) an all out declaration of victory, as the church finds itself caught off guard and intertwined in his evil end-time warfare, strategies and systems.

At least it would have caught the church “off guard” were Janice Fountaine not there to bring attention to the issue.

She was running for the New Independent Christian Party (with one Ralph Martino as co-chair), since “[t]he misrepresentation of the biblical teachings and principles to which we profess as Christians, prevent us from continuing to support either the Democratic or the Republican Party candidates.” They even had a foreign policy statement (“America is the world police, whether we like it or not”). She ended up, however, running for the GOP, who reportedly had some trouble finding suitable candidates in certain Maryland districts.

Fountaine is also the author of Why should I Wait, When God Said Go? Who’s Going To Get Gomer?(book and play), Realms and Dimensions of the Supernatural and The Apostolic Burden.


Diagnosis: With Louie Gohmert already in Congress, one can understand how some people might be curious to check what the limits on what drivel one may succeed in electing to positions of power might possibly be. Fountaine seems to have been a small step too far (in Maryland, at least), however. 

#1624: Keith Fournier

$
0
0
Yes, this is familiar territory, but we still need to cover it. Keith Fournier is the editor of Catholic Online, a former attorney with Pat Robertson’s American Center for Law and Justice, and head of the Common Good Alliance, and he does not like homosexuals. And since he is a loon, Fournier has channeled his dislike of homosexuals into paranoid conspiracy theories, expressed for instance in his columns at Matt Barber’s website Barbwire, where he has claimed that same-sex marriage will lead to as much violence as China’s Cultural Revolution, which left millions dead and which is what zeh gays are aiming for in the US, ostensibly because they are murderous. He also described anti-gay activists as the “true liberators” and “advocates for a society of human flourishing and freedom” who are preventing the “cultural slide into the abyss of relativism,” because he has realized that he can really just make words mean whatever he wants them to mean and that his audience is as crazy as himself. That’s also why allowing gays to marry is anti-Christian discrimination. Meanwhile, those who disagree with him and notice what he’s saying are “spying”, no less.

At least he has the dubious honor of being the author of one of the most embarrassing arguments against gay marriage ever: Yes, his piece contains the common claim that since “homosexual sexual acts” can “never be the equivalent of marriage,” therefore the existence of homosexuals undermine marriage, but the novel move is his point that it doesn’t matter whether there exists any genetic disposition toward homosexuality, since there may be genetic dispositions toward obesity as well; so “[s]hould we as a Nation decide that fat people have a civil right to be fat? Should those who insist that they resist that ‘genetic predisposition’ to overeat be called Fata-phobic?” Yeah, just think about that (Fournier evidently didn’t).

Here is Fournier on the Kim Davis affair – his main claim being that Davis’ oath to uphold the laws only requires her to uphold the laws that were in effect before she was sworn into office (just think for a moment about how ludicrous that idea is) – ending with a call for a “Christian revolution”. (You can find a nice list of deranged wingnut legal misconceptions about the Davis case here.) And here is Fournier being miffed that Ireland overwhelmingly voted to legalize gay marriage, threatening the Irish that Fournier’s bully friend God will come and beat them up if they don’t agree with him.

Honorable mention to his namesake Ray Fournier, a public school teacher and homeschooling activist in North Carolina who has called out public schools for being “concentration camps” that turn kids gay.


Diagnosis: There really isn’t much more to say about this one. A delusional, angry, evil and hateful monster, but we doubt that his nonsense carries much influence beyond the usual suspects.

#1625: Wendy Fournier

$
0
0
Wendy Fournier is an anti-vaccine activist and president of the National Autism Association (NAA), a group committed to the ridiculously false idea that “[v]accinations can trigger or exacerbate autism in some, if not many, children, especially those who are genetically predisposed to immune, autoimmune or inflammatory conditions” (it also lists the other usual and falsified (if they were ever worth taking seriously) autism “biomed” causes, such as pesticides, pharmaceuticals, proximity to freeways and the like). Katie Wright is a board member. Fournier and the NAA are, of course, more committed to antivaxx lunacy than the “mays” or “cans” of the NAA mission statement might suggest (and which, to emphasize once again, is in blatant denial of the uniform results of actual research). Indeed, the NAA is a sponsor of the quack seminar Age of Autism. But Fournier and the NAA of course don’t market themselves as antivaccine conspiracy theorists. That’s presumably how they could for instance manage to land a partnership with Chili’s, which the company – after actually taking the time to check out what they were sponsoring – subsequently backed out of. Mike Adams took the case to show, once again, that there is a global conspiracy by the “medical mafia” to kill everyone (a framing that probably didn’t help the NAA’s standing with donors, and Fournier claimed that Chili’s cancellation was bullying, orchestrated by people who hate children with autism and that the anti-vaccine claims of the NAA are made by parents who “are entitled to their viewpoints without being attacked.”

Of course, despite denying that she is “antivaccine” (which most anti-vaxxers do as a ploy to look “moderate”, even though it is usually not hard to see through it), Fournier has a penchant for participating at antivaccine conferences, such as the Give Autism A Chance Summit of The Autism Trust, together with “luminaries” like Rob Schneider, Andrew Wakefield, Arthur Krigsman and Kim Stagliano. Though she knows nothing about science or how research works, Fournier has also been caught dismissing scientific studies that find no link between vaccines and autism out of hand. And if you don’t understand the science but don’t like the results of a study, what do you do? You obfuscate, appeal to conspiracy (“conflict of interest”) and move the goalposts, of course.


Diagnosis: Hardcore science denialist and conspiracy theorist. And like most rabid antivaccine activist she has been forced into the conspiracy theorist position position by those pesky, bullying scientists: She knows what she wants the answer to be, but evidence, science and reality tell us that this answer is wrong, so what choice does she have?

#1626: Terry Fox

$
0
0
Michael R. Fox, climate change denialist (climate change is a conspiracy among researchers to obtain research money) and, apparently, HIV denialist has passed away, giving his spot in this Encyclopedia to yet another fundamentalist whacko, Terry Fox.

Terry Fox, as pastor of the Immanuel Baptist Church in Wichita (a position he later left to focus on his activism), came to attention in 2005, when he became involved, first, in a successful campaign to ban gay marriage and, second, in the now famous fight over the Kansas school board’s science standards. (His discussion with Eugenie Scott, in which he flaunts some impressive levels of ignorance, can be viewed here.) According to Fox, evolution is a “cult” and “the mother of all liberalism”, and the science standards for public education should be changed to also include creationismintelligent design in part because “most people in Kansas don’t think we came from monkeys” (which we hope is true, but not in the way Fox thinks). During his efforts he also cited the “homosexual agenda” and “taking Christ out of Christmas”. Just as well, I suppose – the debate was never about science in any case (also illustrated by board member Connie Morris, who called evolution a “fairytale” and, when she lost her bid, blamed the “lying liberal media” for her defeat). “If you can cause enough doubt on evolution, liberalism will die,” said Fox.

During the debates, Fox seemed to be dimly aware that getting evangelicism and young-earth creationism into public schools would potentially cause some legal problems, and supported the Discovery Institute strategy of introducing creationism in the name of “intellectual freedom”. So, although creationism was his goal (“creationism's going to be our big battle”), he was willing to take things one step at a time: “We’re trying to be a little more subtle,” said Fox. Unfortunately for him and the Discovery Institute, subtlety turned out not to be his strong suit.


Diagnosis: Oh, yes: Another crazy and hateful liar for Jesus. Fortunately for the rest of us, Fox isn’t very good at lying. We don’t know what he’s up to these days (he’s been heavily involved in anti-gay activism, at least) but it is surely nothing good.

Addendum: Actually, we do have some idea what he's up to. He's become a ghost buster! At his new church, Summit Church, the entire ministry team is "trained to help people who are battling the supernatural."

#1627: Neal Frey

$
0
0
Remember the Texas Board of Education antics a couple of years back? One of the central, uh, grassroots players on the side of abysmally fundamentalist crazy was the organization Educational Research Analysts (ERA), founded a long time ago by Mel and Norma Gabler to campaign against public school textbooks that the Gablers regarded as “anti-family” or “anti-Christian”, which would be pretty much everything this side of Tertullian, including those that contain “statements about religions other than Christianity, statements emphasizing contributions by minorities, and statements critical of slave owners.” Those “religions other than Christianity” would include humanism, which the Gablers claimed were a “religion” that taught ideas such as evolution, sex education, internationalism and an optimistic view of human nature. Given the time and age of their campaigns, ERA managed – despite having no education – to achieve an impressive level of clout with the State Board of Education (who adopted many of their suggestions), and were, by the 2000s, major players.

When they died, ERA was taken over by their long time coworker Neal Frey, who continued their work (“[r]eplacing stan­dard algorithms with haphazard searches for personal meaning unconstitutionally establishes New Age relig­ious behavior in public school Math instruction” is a 2007 example) and, in particular, tried to use it to affect the outcomes of the Texas textbook wars.

As of 2014 he was still trying to combat the teaching of evolution in Texas schools, and did for instance file a formal complaint with the Texas Education Agency alleging that Pearson Education’s high school biology textbook was wrong in explaining the close similarities between chimpanzee and human DNA and saying that scientific evidence shows that chimps are the closest living genetic relatives of humans. Pearson responded by pointing out that Frey doesn’t have the faintest clue what he is talking about, but the State Board of Education Chairwoman Barbara Cargill backed the complaint, ostensibly because she doesn’t have the faintest clue either. Frey also wanted history textbooks to portray white people in the former Confederate states as victims of oppression after the Civil War, but it is unclear whether he found any support for that one.


Diagnosis: Oh, they won’t give up, even though the movement has been intellectually more or less dead since the Middle Ages. Frey still continues to fight bitterly against sanity, truth and reason, but his influence seems to have waned a bit the last couple of years but the Texas Taliban anti-science campaign is certainly not dead. He’s still dangerous.

#1628: Stanton T. Friedman

$
0
0
A.k.a. The Flying Saucer Physicist (his own moniker)

Stanton T. Friedman lives in Canada, but seems to be of American origin, and that might be sufficient to qualify for inclusion in the Encyclopedia. He certainly qualifies on merit. Friedman is a retired nuclear physicist who once worked on technology development for various large companies, but who since the 1970s has devoted his life full-time to traveling around the world lecturing about UFOs and giving TV and radio appearances. In fact, Friedman is sometimes considered to be one of the greatest experts on the topic, which is not necessarily very impressive, as he has, ostensibly, written some “80 UFO-related papers” (journals not specified) and even “provided written testimony to Congressional hearings,” where he explained that the evidence suggests that Earth is being visited by intelligently controlled extraterrestrial vehicles; unfortunately, Congress seems to have had a “you need to showus, not just tell us”-attitude toward that evidence, and wasn’t particularly impressed with what he had to show. He has also appeared on George Noory’s Coast to Coast AM radio show, which presumably gave him a more appropriate audience.

According to Wikipedia, Friedman was “the first civilian to document the site of the Roswell UFO incident” and naturally thinks the Roswell incident involved a genuine crash of an extraterrestrial spacecraft and – accordingly – a widespread government conspiracy to cover it up. As he told Congress, Friedman also believes that UFO sightings are consistent with magnetohydrodynamic propulsion, and in 1996, after researching and fact checking (some quotation marks would probably have been apt) the Majestic 12 documents, Friedman concluded that there was no substantive grounds for dismissing their authenticity – which seems to miss a point or two about who has the burden of proof in these cases. But as Friedman says, he has little patience for “nasty, noisy negativists” or – said in different words – the idea of trying to falsify hypotheses (rather than Texas sharpshooting) as a research strategy. Later on even Friedman himself provided evidence that at least some of the Majestic 12 documents were hoaxes, which, since they were “found” together is pretty solid evidence that they all are. In fact, they are all hoaxes, of course, and they are easily demonstrated to be so. At present, the Majestic 12 seems to serve as something of a gateway between fun-loving, open-minded, silly hobby UFO enthusiasm and tinfoil hat gubmint-is-using-mind-control-rays territory.

Does he have any positive evidence at all? Well, he likes to cite a 1964 star map drawn by infamous alleged alien abductee Betty Hill during a hypnosis session, which she said was shown to her during her abduction. The case is a pretty legendary example of (literally) searching for a terrain to fit the map: one astronomer, Marjorie Fish, spent much effort scouring the night sky until finding – if one adjusted things a little (removing some stars, adding others) – something that fit Hill’s map and story (and not particularly well at that). Even the fit-after-adjustments has later been utterly debunked by new astronomical discoveries, but it is unclear that Friedman even cares. After all, he has, together with Kathleen Marden, written a book about the Hills: Captured! The Betty and Barney Hill UFO Experience. Apart from the map, their evidence that the Hills were abducted by aliens is pretty much this: Betty Hill spent two years writing a UFO story and sharing it with her husband Barney, and then, when asked about that story under hypnosis, Barney Hill was able to tell it pretty much as Betty wrote it (dum-dum-dum-dum-dum).

Friedman has also repeatedly cited the 1996 Yukon UFO, which has conclusively been shown to be the re-entry of the Cosmos 2335 second stage rocket booster. He hasn’t mentioned that part. In fact, he generally doesn’t seem to take it particularly well when his claims get debunked, and has argued (e.g. in “The Pseudo-Science of Anti-Ufology”), in response to careful, scientific investigations of UFO phenomena, that skeptics’ arguments “aren’t scientific, but rather represent research by proclamation rather than investigation,” because their careful investigations don’t yield the conclusions he would like. Another piece of alleged evidence he seems to be fond of is the Project Blue Book Special Report Number 14, a statistical analysis of UFO reports released by the Battelle Memorial Institute back in 1955. It is discussed here. Needless to say, reasonable people are not impressed.

In fact, Friedman has written numerous books and, more importantly, appeared in virtually every UFO-fan documentary ever made, such as Overlords of the UFO and the hilariously and embarrassingly anticlimactic Best Evidence! Top 10 UFO Sightings which was supposed to give us what UFO fans considered the best cases of UFO they’ve got; this one was #1 (indeed, the Yukon case mentioned above made an appearance as well). When asked why UFO sightings have increased over the last half century, Friedman suggests that it’s obviously aliens checking up on us in case we nuke them rather than, you know, citing “higher population”, “better record-keeping” or “more effective media”; it’s a rather illuminating answer with regard to how Friedman assigns initial likelihoods to hypotheses.

Friedman is also an opponent of SETI, however, since the implicit premise of SETI is, as Friedman sees it, that there has been no extraterrestrial visitation of the planet (and the researchers are by extension not taking him seriously). He has, however, apparently endorsed semi-legendary and hilariously quaint distance healer Braco. In 2012 Friedman also received some attention for a spectacularly unsuccessful participation in a marketing ploy for the “found footage” movie Apollo 18.


Diagnosis: Oh, dear. At least he’s something of a legend, but possibly not for the reasons he would have wished (except, perhaps, among hardened lunatics). Entertaining fellow.

#1629: Catherine Frompovich

$
0
0
Catherine Frompovich is an antivaccine loon who writes for the International Medical Council on Vaccination (an Orwellian name if there ever was one) and has (proudly) co-authored several papers with anti-vaccine legend Harold Buttram. In particular, Frompovich, who claims to have a degree in “orthomolecular therapy,” which is not a medical degree, is most familiar for touting the idea that shaken baby syndrome (SBS) (or, as it is correctly termed, “abusive head trauma”) does not only not exist, but is really a misdiagnosis for vaccine injury, an idea (discussed here) “so unbelievable and so outrageous that” that it should have “died off by now through the sheer contempt and ridicule so justly heaped upon it by anyone with a modicum of critical thinking skills.” Of which, unfortunately, Frompovich is in short supply. She’s also a bit desperate for evidence for her delusion, naturally enough, and will apparently use anything that comes her way, regardless of quality and even if it does in no way even purport to support her idea. In fact, Frompovich has (with Buttram) even made presentations on SBS for the FDA. We do not know how the FDA reacted, but we suspect they’re used to facepalming.

Frompovich still believes that “vaccines DO cause autism.” Not only that, but the FDA, official health agencies and pharmaceutical companies know this. As evidence she, well, uses whatever seems to come her way, such as vaccine court rulings, which do, to put it mildly, not indicate that any such connection exists – Frompovich is fond of dumpster diving in the VAERS database, something anti-vaxxers are fond of and which is proof as good as any that they have no idea how evidence works, and Frompovich truly loved this one, which itself demonstrates that she has no idea what its significance might be. She also links to scientific studies that she has apparently not read and far less understood. Par for the course.

Her work has also been published by Age of Autism and VacTruth.org – notably an article with the title “Aborted Human Fetal Cells in Vaccines” (yes, that gambit; only the purest and craziest of antivaxx morons dare run that one.) And she is the author of a book, Vaccination Voodoo: What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, which does, indeed, tell you a lot of stuff neither you nor Frompovich or anyone else know or could know about vaccines – it has as much to do with reality as Time Cube. Here is a deconstruction of one of her articles on Gardasil. Needless to say, she has no idea what she is talking about.


Diagnosis: Fuming conspiracy theorist. As such, she has made a name for herself among other fuming conspiracy theorists and the darker parts of comment sections on health-related articles. Crazy as shit, and anyone who ever cites any of her stuff has automatically lost whatever argument they were engaged in and should be laughed out of the room.

#1630: Aaron Fruh

$
0
0
More anti-gay ridiculousness, this time from Aaron Fruh, an Alabama pastor who seems to be treated as an authority on the issue of homosexuality by the American Family Association and who was picked up by Janet Porter’s coalition Israel: You Are Not Alone, which is campaigning against any concession Israel might make to the Palestinians on the grounds that giving Palestinians land or rights is a direct cause of terrorism.

Fruh claims that any society that has failed to oppress gays has been destroyed by God: “So when it comes to civilization and society, God knew that the people of the earth were going to destroy themselves through same-sex marriage,” said Fruh, “so that’s why he brought the flood.” So just you dare! Like so many others Fruh also claims that marriage equality is actually “heterophobic” because it discriminates against heterosexuals and “against the unborn children who will never see the light of day if you revise the historical, moral and legal view of traditional marriage.” In other words, he appears to believe allowing gays and lesbians to marry means taking away heterosexual couples’ right to marry and have children, and that banning homosexual marriage will make homosexuals enter into heterosexual marriages instead. In fact, marriage equality is the “height of bigotry,” and gays and lesbians are “hateful and malicious” toward married heterosexuals (yes: he takes advocacy of gay marriage to be a direct attack on him for being non-homosexually married), but his arguments make it rather abundantly clear that Fruh doesn’t really understand what it means to be “hateful and malicious” against groups of people, or what “bigotry” involves.


Diagnosis: Fruh has emphasized that “I don’t consider myself homophobic,” but it really doesn’t matter how he considers himself. Fruh is abysmallyhomophobic. And angry. And evil.
Viewing all 2331 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>