Quantcast
Channel: Encyclopedia of American Loons
Viewing all 2359 articles
Browse latest View live

#1319: David Anick

$
0
0
I think this picture is pretty old

David Anick is an MD, mathematician and researcher into homeopathy and, in particular, water memory. The level of crackpot pseudoscience in his contributions is pretty impressive, and his supposed mathematical model for why homeopathic dilution works and for why the standard dilutions are correct, as described in his paper “The octave potencies convention: a mathematical model of dilution and succession,” is torn to shreds here. Rarely has mathematics been more badly mangled than here. To put it briefly, mathematical modeling may be tricky, and at the very least it requires abstracting the properties of a real system that you want to model, finding a model that matches observations, developing the model, and then validating it against tests. And Anick’s paper manage to get all those steps as wrong as one can conceivable get. Of course, the paper was published in a rather well-known pseudojournal: Homeopathy. To put it diplomatically, Homeopathy is not a place to turn to for medical information.

In short, David Anick is apparently completely incompetent at what he is doing, which is – to begin with – one of the most ridiculous branches of quasi-religious pseudoscience there is. But here is the thing. David Anick was, at the time of writing the paper, affiliated with Harvard Medical School, McLean Hospital (currently he’s at the Marino Center for Integrative Health), and he does have a PhD in mathematics. Accordingly, many commentators took his paper to be a hoax, which it apparently it wasn’t (Anick has written other papers for the same journal as well, including “The silica hypothesis for homeopathy: physical chemistry,” with John A. Ives, the Senior Director of the Center for Brain, Mind, and Healing at the Samueli Institute, who also has a history of making efforts to change the standards of scientific evidence to make homeopathy come out efficacious). The whole situation is, in other words, rather sad. Anick is apparently still working on a mathematical modeling of homeopathy.

Diagnosis: Breathtaking pseudoscience. Utterly breathtaking. Yet people apparently fall for this shit (Anick has received a pretty substantial German Wikipedia page, for instance).

#1320: Robert Antonellis

$
0
0

We don’t really know who Robert Antonellis is, but apparently he’s got computer and Internet access, and is not afraid to use it to spread his ideas about how the world hangs together (at his website christianclout.com – feel free to check it out). Basically, he is engaged in combat with our evil overlords, the ones that are trying to … well, lets let him try to spell it out himself:

The Clintons and the ‘Mainstream Media’ have been hiding their involvement in the creation of the man-made pandemic called AIDS and that this dread disease serves Jewish interests. And they have hidden the truth that they exported poison blood from an Arkansas prison for injection into the arms of black school children in Africa, to fulfill China’s Africa Policy: exterminate the indigineous population to make room for wave upon wave of Chinese immigrants yet to come. Once China occupies Africa, they will seize control of the Mediterranean Sea and choke off America’s primary source of energy. This is the reason the Jews (disguised as environmentalists) have not allowed America to drill domestically for oil or build nuclear power plants for decades. And once China controls the Mediterranean Sea, they can turn the continent of Europe red with communism and the blood of Christians, and finally fulfill the Jew’s eternal goal: to plant the head of the Pope on a pole in Vatican City in sight of the Holy See.

Quite so. And they seem to be onto him for figuring it out. “Here’s a short list of the well funded people and organizations which may exact their revenge against me in court: Jane Fonda, Mike Savage, Ted Kennedy, Dominose, Bain Capital, Wal-Mart, John Kerry, Henry Kissinger, Target, Jimmy Carter, Rush Limbaugh, Tyson Foods, Warren Buffet, Matt Drudge, Walter Kronkite, H.B. Hunt, Barney Frank, Microsoft, Obama, Star Market, The Oprah, President Hu of China, IBM, Bill and Hillary Clinton, John McCain, General Electric, Feingold of McCain-Feingold, Comverse, The Bushes and the Walker klan, Odigo, Duval Patrick, Hugo Chavez, Citgo, Petrol Express, Merryl Lynch, King of Dubai, President of Iran, Fundtech, Putin, Bill Gates, Al Gore, Spielberg, Rupert Murdoch, the Rothchilds, Dick Morris, New York Stock Exchange, George Soros, the Rockefellers, the Rockefeller Institute, Mayor Michael Bromberg, Fred Thomas, the Warburgs, Mitt Romney, Domino’s Pizza, Papa Johns, et al.They’re allin it together, and they are all closely monitoring him.

Diagnosis: You know there are people you can talk to, Bob? 

#1321: Bill Armistead

$
0
0

Bill Armistead is the former chairman (2011–2015) of the Alabama Republican Party, and is probably most famous for his sympathies with various birther conspiracies. In 2012 Armistead recommended that his voters watch Joel Gilbert’s fringe birther movie “Dreams of My Real Father”, which claims that President Obama’s real father is American labor activist Frank Marshall Davis, and that Obama is accordingly pursuing Davis’s “dreams of a forced imposition of a classic Stalinist-Marxist agenda upon America at home and abroad,” by for instance working with ACORN to cause the subprime mortgage crisis as part of a plan to “use minorities and the poor to collapse capitalism.” Armistead, on his side, stated that he had “verified that it is factual, all of it,” but has given no indication that he knows what “verified” means. Due to the current culture on the right wing, the claim didn’t not lose Armistead favor with the leaders of the Republican Party.

Armistead is of course not the only birther in the Alabama Republican party. Prominent birther, State Republican Committee member, and former Congressional candidate Hugh McInnish has been pushing it for years: “In my white paper I will present what I believe is conclusive evidence that the Obama birth certificate is a forgery and Obama himself a forgerer. […] It would mean that the most powerful nation in the world is under the direction of a felon. It might mean, as some legal expert contend, that all of his executive actions are null and void.” As most people making the same claim, McInnish seems systematically unable to distinguish “conclusive evidence” from “delusional gibberish”.

On other issues Armistead tends to take the position you’d expect someone like him to take. As for gay marriage, Armistead called the Supreme Court’s Decision “an affront to the Christian principles that this nation was founded on.” And of course The Alabama Republican Party stood “firmly behind Judge Roy Moore to serve as the next Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court” in 2012, which is probably enough to merit an entry in our Encyclopedia on its own. During the recent brouhaha over gay marriage in Alabama, Armistead wrote an impassioned defense for Moore’s actions, also warning about God’s judgment.

Diagnosis: Sometimes one wonders if it is part of the job description for being chairman of the Alabama Republican Party, but at least Armistead is fringe-level crazy in a rightwing mainstream sort of way.

#1322: Virginia Armstrong

$
0
0

Virginia Armstrong is the national chair of Phyllis Schlafly’s Eagle Forum. Armstrong is, accordingly, a seriously hardcore loon. According to Armstrong, America is locked in “the deadly struggle between the Humanistic worldview and the Judeo-Christian worldview,” and she elects to proudly carry the torch for the third side of delusional fundie insanity. Why “deadly”? Well, Armstrong blamed the 2007 Virginia Tech shootings, for instance, as “among the “graphic results of America's Culture War”. More precisely,  she blamedactivist/liberal federal judges” who “have long been fighting to expunge every vestige of God from our nation's classrooms and public life;” moreover, the “teaching of evolutionism” leads to“youths behav[ing] like animals” and reproductive choice leads to “our youths conclude that they, too, have the right to kill the children around them.” In conclusion, [w]e rightly grieve over the losses of Columbine High School, Virginia Tech, and the abortion chambers still spewing out cauldrons of innocent American blood. We should also grieve over a major cause – America's activist/liberal federal judges who have sown the wind, while our children reap the whirlwind. Surely it is time for us to CURB THE COURTS and reclaim our children and our country.” The facts be damned: America is going to hell, regardless of the fact any reasonable parameter of measurement actually suggests the opposite.

And no, she doesn’t like evolution (and no, she doesn’t even begin to understand evolution), as shown by this breathtaking comment:

Fact v. Fiction #2: Evolutionists claim that their battle against creation-science is primarily a ‘scientific’ issue, not a constitutional question. But our treasured U. S. Constitution is written by persons and for persons. If man is an animal, the Constitution was written by animals and for animals. This preposterous conclusion destroys the Constitution. The Aguillard Humanists leave us with no Constitution and no constitutional rights of any kind if they allow us to teach only that man is an animal.” [Emphasis in the original]

Right. I don’t like linking to their websites, but her own “Constitutionalist Manifesto” must also be seen to be believed. While professing to like the Constitution she clearly has no idea how it is supposed to work.

According to her bio, she holds “the” Ph.D in political science and public law. She never says from where.

Diagnosis: Zeal, ardent fundamentalism, and a complete, well-demonstrated lack of how science, society or reality actually work. There seems to be a competition among certain segments of the religious right to be as dumb, uninformed, and critical thinking-challenged as possible. As such, Armstrong has made a pretty strong case for herself.

#1323: Joe Arpaio

$
0
0

Joe Arpaio is the wingnut sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona, an office nominally designated as an agency for upholding the law, rather than what Arpaio personally thinks shouldbe the law (no, he does not seem to be aware of the difference). Or as Balko aptly described him: “a power-mad, office-abusing sheriff who has misspent millions in taxpayer funds, and who once let a celebrity drive a damned tank into a man’s home (on suspicion of cockfighting, no less).” Fortune, however, placed Arpaio on the other side of the bar, to the dismay and horror of anyone even minimally civilized.

For instance, Arpaio has taken a very hard line against illegal immigration. Indeed, he declines to hand illegal immigrants over to federal authorities for deportation (instead jailing them), and the office has been so busy hunting illegal immigrants that nothing else has really received much attention (including over 400 sexual assault cases, most of which involve children, whichhe didn’t bother to look into – indeed, the sheriff’s office readily admitted that they didn’t care). In the end (May 2012), the Justice Department filed a civil suit against Arpaio in Federal court due to multiple civil rights violations primarily aimed at the Latino population of Maricopa County (a brief summary of his civil rights violations is here); and yes, the conclusion was, unsurprisingly, that Arpaio has engaged in systematic discrimination against Latino residents of his county (and he did, eventually, receive a mild slap on his wrist). But then again, Arpaio doesn’t really believe in civil rights, at least not free speech, and at least not when it is used to criticize him (which he does think constitutes violation of his civil rights). And yes, he is still a racist – and still a hero of the Western conservatives – those things are, frankly, not unrelated.

Arpaio also uses the sheriff's office, including its official communication organs, as self-promotion tools, including the publication of his political differences with the federal government and of his opinions on Arizona political happenings; he also sells prison equipment (especially those indicative of his own dubious civil rights track record) as souvenirs through an outfit called the Posse Foundation, once again with funding from the sheriff’s office.

But Arpaio is by far most famous for his birther activism – indeed, he may probably be said to be the leading birther activist in the US after assuming the mantle from Orly Taitz following the latter’s repeated crashes and burns (not that any of them has stopped her), and making the WND all giddy in the process. In particular, Arpaio argues, partially on the grounds of info – incoherent rants – he obtained from Taitz, that President Obama’s birth certificate and selective service (draft) registration card are fakes. His volunteer “Cold Case Posse” conducted an “investigation” together with Jerome Corsi – Arpaio was baffled and angry that no one but the WND seemed to pay much attention – and then held an impressively long press conference to announce their findings: the documents are fraudulent and Obama was probably born abroad and is not eligible to be President (who would have expected that outcome from their fair and unbiased investigations). Their evidence was heavily dependent on the idea that the birth certificate’s electronic form, as released online by the White House, differed from a “control” sample certificate that they scanned themselves. Suffice to say that few people not already committed to the birther cause were impressed. On the other hand, Tea Party intellectual strategist Judson Phillips actually seemed to believe that Arpaio’s “findings” would lead to criminal charges against Obama. More interestingly, the man in charge of running Arizona’s elections, Secretary of State Ken Bennett, claimed he became unsure whether Barack Obama was really born in the United States after Arpaio’s revelations, and threatened to keep the president off the ballot for the 2012 election. No Ken: no one actually believes that you came to those conclusions based on Arpaio’s research.

It is worth mentioning that the day before Arpaio’s “Cold Case Posse” released the report, the lead investigator, Michael Zullo, published a book on the topic, co-authored with Jerome Corsi. It is also worth mentioning that Arpaio conducted his birther investigations using taxpayer money.

But Arpaio wasn’t done, and with Zullo he made another ridiculous attempt in July 2012, adding the claim that super-secret codes were hidden in the birth certificate and that some very old person (not present at the press conference) was the only one who could figure out what those codes actually meant. They also asserted that Hawaiian police were following Zullo around to harass him during his “investigation” (meanwhile the above-mentioned civil lawsuit against Arpaio was going on, but that was of course completely unrelated). Zullo, on his side, has continued to present his “evidence” at various venues, including the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association convention, where Rep. Steve Stockman (R-Texas), attended and was, according to Zullo, “deeply concerned about it and he really does want to have a lengthy, lengthy discussion about this.” In December 2013, the WND once again promised a “universe-shattering” birther revelation in the near future – Zullo was “unable to reveal details at the moment,” but it would be “beyond the pale of anything you could imagine”. Let us predict it will be the same nebulous tripe as every time before, shall we? (We haven’t heard much new since that article, at least.) Arpaio, on his side, was apparently too busy making “progress” on the investgations to run for the office of governor of Arizona – he has even teamed up with Larry Klayman. The Obama administration, being afraid of his investigation, was at the same time intentionally sending minors from Central America to his home county as a personal “affront” to his notorious anti-immigrant activism. “The White House is incompetent and the dumping of illegals is intentional,” he said.

In early 2013, after the Sandy Hook shootings, Arpaio announced he would form an all volunteer posse of “well trained”, gun-carrying patrols to drive around town and protect the schools. In early February 2013 it was predictably discovered that his posse included at least one convicted child molester, and several men convicted of domestic abuse. The training was given by criminal justice expert Steven Seagal, whose qualifications include “hundreds of thousands if not millions of hours into my weapons training.”

Arpaio is due to face a contempt hearing in April 2015 over his repeated failure to comply with previous court orders in the ongoing court case involving his blatant violation of the civil rights of suspects and prisoners. We are looking forward to it.

Diagnosis: Racist, fascist, old-fashioned conspiracy theorist. That he ends up being the one who nominally defends the law in Maripose County unfortunately tells you more than a little about the residents of that county.

#1324: Inanna Arthen

$
0
0

Inanna Arthen is, according to her bio, a “trained psychic and professional Tarot reader, Inanna has taught classes in psychic development, meditation and ‘practical magick working,’ and has extensive knowledge and experience of every branch of paranormal phenomena.” That’s not a good start for making inquiries into anything having to do with reality, and Arthen’s attempts to carry out such inquiries are … well, in fact, somewhat novel.

Arthen is most famous for her claims that vampires are real, a claim that initially brought her some underground fame through this article in 1987. Vampires are beings who “appear on the surface to be somewhat eccentric members of society, yet their outward idiosyncrasies only hint at how different they are from those around them.” In fact, “[a] vampire is a person born with an extraordinary capacity to absorb, channel, transform, and manipulate ‘pranic energy’ or life force.” For the most part, then, vampires feed off of your life energy, though they sometimes drink blood as well: “Only real vampires can directly absorb the pranic energy in fresh blood, and for this reason some real vampires are attracted to blood and find different means of obtaining it.” You identify them “by a certain quality to the energy,” and by the fact that they are night people: they have excellent night vision, but are sensitive to sunlight and frequently experience digestive trouble.

Unfortunately, most vampires are unaware of their own true natures. “Evolved” vampires may, however, “become extraordinary magicians and healers,” and according to Arthen pagan magickal people like herself should work to identify vampires and help them evolve. So there you go.

Diagnosis: Her career seems to be primarily based on writing fiction. Some of it she apparently – rather randomly – designates as “non-fiction” because she is a loon.

#1325: Eugene C. Ashby

$
0
0

Eugene C. Ashby is a Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Chemistry at Georgia Institute of Technology, and a hardcore intelligent design creationist. As a creationist, Ashby has apparently made a zealous effort to perpetuate all the standard misunderstandings and untruths concerning evolution associated with creationism, many of which he published in his book (tract, really) Understanding the Creation/Evolution Controversy, in which he amply demonstrated that he does not understand the Creation/Evolution “controversy”. Oh yes, you will find the creationist distinction between macro- and microevolution, Haeckel’s embryos, and peppered moths, and that’s just the beginning. It’s really all there.

Ashby also supported the infamous disclaimer stickers in Cobb County, GA, put on biology textbooks proclaiming that evolution is “a theory, not a fact”. And, since he does indeed possess a legitimate degree (contrary to what you’d be led to expect from his support for the aforementioned sticker), a signatory to the Discovery Institute’s petition A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism.

Diagnosis: Pseudoscientist. Ashby has a real degree, but his education does not seem to have given him much grasp of science.

#1326: Cindy Asmussen

$
0
0

Cindy Asmussen is the Central Texas Area Director for the wingnut organization Concerned Women for America. They apparently have chapters all over the place, each of which apparently contains at least a few people like Asmussen (the south Texas area director, Pat Hanson, has for instance been involved in fighting the teaching of evolution and global warming in Texas public schools) – we won’t be able to cover them all, of course, but Asmussen can stand as an illustrative example .

So Asmussen doesn’t fancy gays. In 2011, for instance, she received some attention for her plea to boycott Macy’s over the company’s LGBT rights policy. In fact, Asmussen wasn’t just concerned about “the lesbian, ‘gay,’ bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) agenda in our nation;” she also complained against the Obama administration’s efforts to fight both legal and social discrimination against LGBT people around the world. Such efforts, said Asmussen, infringes on the rights of people who don’t support LGBT rights and undercut ‘ex-gay’ reparative therapy. And that, Asmussen, is the kind of claim that will land you an entry in our Encyclopedia.

Of course, Asmussen has deluded herself into believing that she is the victim: “LGBT activists want to alter OUR lifestyles by intimidating us into accepting what we know is not of God, by trying to inhibit our free speech rights and abilities to speak out against it, and by forcing us to use the same dressing rooms.” Yes, people like Asmussen say things like that, even though it is so ridiculous that no minimally reasonable person could actually consciously believe it is true. We are hence forced to conclude that Asmussen is repeating it without actually thinking about what she is saying. In other words, she is bigotbotting.

Diagnosis: Bigotbot.     

#1327: Ed Asner

$
0
0

Ed Asner is television, stage, and voice actor of some fame, and a former president of the Screen Actors Guild. He has been engaged in various work that I suppose many readers will be sympathetic to, and seems in most respects to be a good guy.

However, he is also a loon. Most significantly, Ed Asner is a 9/11 truther and one of the signatories to the organization 9/11 Truth’s 2004 statement calling for a new investigation into the September 11 attacks, a support he has later repeated. He also narrated the documentary film The Oil Factor: Behind the War on Terror. And as spokesman for 2004 Racism Watch, he wrote an open letter to “peace and justice leaders” encouraging them to demand “full 9-11 truth” through the organization 9-11 Visibility Project. Of course, Asner is not the only celebrity truther, and it there are apparently plans for him to appear in a movie September Morn with other truthers such as Martin Sheen and Woody Harrelson. And no, Asner isn’t one of those who “have a lot of questions;” Ed Asner is a “controlled demolition” promoter. It doesn’t matter what science or evidence says, since those scientists and evidentists are probably part of the conspiracy anyways.

Diagnosis: Doddering, confused fool. Probably not particularly harmful on his own, but he sure does his best to lend credibility to the batshit crazy.

#1328: John Assaraf

$
0
0

John Assaraf is, according to himself, a serial entrepreneur, brain researcher, and CEO of PraxisNow, a brain-research company that creates some of the most powerful evidence-based brain retraining tools and programs in the world. Sounds impressive? (no, he doesn’t provide any evidence – he has anecdotes, though; his target group probably won’t know the differece). Today, John researches, writes and lectures extensively around the world on the neuroscience of success and achieving maximum performance,” might lead you to suspect that scientific research isn’t really the main goal here. And it does not appear that Assaraf has any education even remotely related to neuroscience or consciousness studies. But he is sure interested in ”brain research, quantum physics, spiritual growth, health, exercise, travel, cooking, family, great food, friends and philanthropy.”

Did the word “quantum” just pop up in there? Oh, yes, it did. And now you probably have an idea about what kind of “neuroscience research” Assaraf promotes. Here is Assaraf on quantum physics: “They have proven that thoughts are what put together and hold together this ever-changing energy field into the ‘objects’ that we see,” says Assaraf. Our perceptions of objects in our environment are just interpretations “solely based on the ‘internal map’ of reality that we have, and not the real truth. Our ‘map’ is a result of our personal life’s collective experiences.” Change that map, and you can get rich: “Your life becomes what you have imagined and believed in most. The world is literally your mirror, enabling you to experience in the physical plane what you hold as your truth … until you change it.”

Yes, it’s the Law of Attraction, mixed with something resembling neurolinguistic programming. (And no, science has not shown what Assaraf thinks; his claims constitue an unsophisticated, bastardized form of Berkeley-style empiricism with conceptual schemes, with the incoherent thought that you can change your scheme at will; it’s not science, it’s badly misunderstood intro-level philosophy). You can nevertheless learn about it in his videos “Money2 The Neuroscience of Financial Success,” the sequel to “How to Earn $1 million.” Assaraf was even featured in the movie adaptation of The Secret. No, Assaraf’s interest in the sciencehere isn’t particularly profound. But he doesproduce self-help books, of the most vapid, fluffy kind, backed up with vague tales of wonder and sheer woo.

Diagnosis: It’s really, really hard to believe that Assaraf is acting in good faith. But if he is … well, entrepeneurs may hail him as a success story, but his claims to care about science don’t even survive the most superficial scrutiny. Loon.

#1329: Susanne Atanus

$
0
0

A candidate called “S. Atanus”? Seriously? But the name is not the only thing that makes Susanne Atanus sound like a cartoon villain.

Now, primaries in election seasons tend to bring out some rabid lunatics, and Susanne Atanus is a fine specimen. Atanus was a candidate in the 2014 Republican primary for the right to challenge incumbent Rep. Jan Schakowsky in Illinois’s 9th district. She ran on a fundamentalist wingnut platform, and has for instance said she believes God controls the weather and has put tornadoes and diseases such as autism and dementia on earth as punishment for gay rights and legalized abortions. ”(Yes, she is also a global warming denialist.) “God is angry,” said Atanus. “We are provoking him with abortions and same-sex marriage and civil unions. Same-sex activity is going to increase AIDS. If it’s in our military it will weaken our military. We need to respect God.” Atanus had previously claimed that the stock market crash of 1929 didn’t actually happen.

She consequently won that primary.

Diagnosis: Good grief. 

#1330: Jeffry John Aufderheide

$
0
0

There is a substantial number of blogs and websites out there devoted to anti-vaccine promotion; many of them claim otherwise, but it is often easy to gauge from the very name that we are talking some hardcore science denialism. Sane Vax is one such. Their official mission is “to promote Safe, Affordable, Necessary & Effective vaccines and vaccination practices through education and information,” and the underlying premise is accordingly that vaccines of today are largely unsafe (or not sane, which does indeed emphasize the lunacy of the group).

Jeffry John Aufderheide blogs for Sane Vax, and does so by combining utter scientific ignorance with paranoia in a manner that rivals the worst. He also writes for – indeed, was the founder of – VacTruth.org, the name of which is equally revealing. His article “WWII Military Handbook Reveals Pesticide Chemicals Used In Infant Vaccines” made its rounds in the expected parts of the Internet, and described Aufderheide’s shock reaction to discovering that some vaccines contain Triton X-100, Tween 20, or Tween 80, which, he discovered in said handbook, were also “used as major components of spraying operations of DDT.” And now, readers, you probably already see what conclusions Aufderheide is going to draw, and also why they reveal such abysmal ignorance of anything remotely resembling anything having to do with science. A sample: “To minimize the above information, you may hear arguments about the chemicals being safe because they are in hand soaps, ice cream, and in our lungs (natural surfactant). For the record, I’ve never seen a mother feeding or injecting a newborn with soap or ice cream. My word of advice to mothers is follow your intuition and ask a lot of questions.” That is some hardcore ignorance going on.

A similar level of crazy can for instance be found in his “History shows polio caused by pesticide exposure, then was eradicated by decline in DDT use.” Yes, it claims that polio was really caused by pesticides, and that doctors have been wrong all along. Do you need to know what his argument is? Oh yes, there’s correlation; that’s enough for Aufderheide, who has apparently never heard of the distinction between correlation and causation. Of course, the correlation doesn’t exist either, which even he might probably have discovered if he’d bothered to look more closely (probably not) – the decline in polio preceded the decline in the use of DDT. But I guess that “close enough” sufficed for Aufderheide.

Diagnosis: Yet another one. I don’t really know how influential Aufderheide actually is, but his articles sometimes get picked up by others, and whatever the amount of influence is, it sure isn’t beneficial.

#1331: Dylan Avery

$
0
0

Dylan Avery is a filmmaker and, in particular, the creator of the Loose Change films (together with Korey Rowe and Jason Bermas), which have established his position as one of the movers and shakers of the troofer community. Through embarrassingly fallacious reasoning, selective use of evidence and numerous misunderstandings based largely on the producers’ lack of understanding of the relevant issues, the “documentary” attempts to “prove” that the 9/11 terrorist attacks were a false flag operation carried out by high-ranking members of the Bush administration. The claims made in the movie have been falsified numerous times (a viewer’s guide is available here), and there have been several updates of the “documentary” in which various bogus claims have been removed; no matter how thoroughly debunked the claims may be it won’t affect the main hypothesis, however, since their method is emphatically notthe scientific one of testing hypotheses against data, but the pseudoscientific one of selecting the data that fit the hypothesis and disregarding the rest.

Among its claims:
-       The World Trade Center towers did not fall because planes flew into them (they do admit that planes did fly into them, but not the Pentagon), but because explosives were placed in the towers causing them to fall.
-       The Pentagon was hit by a cruise missile, not an airplane.
-       United flight 93 did not crash in Pennsylvania, but landed in Ohio, where all the passengers were removed and disappeared (it is unclear why; if the government were going to kill all those passengers anyway, wouldn’t it have been easier to crash the plane?).

Apparently 9/11 was a set-up in order for the US to justify a war in Iraq, although it has no explanation for why the government would carry out such a ruse and not incorporate any connection to Iraq in it. Furthermore, the producers seem to think that if the towers had not fallen, people would not have supported a war, and to accomplish this the Republican party would risk their very existence by planting explosives in the buildings. Most of the claims are discussed in detail here, and many central claims are refuted here.

Oh well, like other conspiracy theories (and creationism, which really is a conspiracy theory as well, in fact), its proponents aren’t really prepared to seriously evaluate or test their own hypotheses; instead, the point is to try, with whatever desperate means available, to poke holes in their opponents’ views, apparently being under the delusion that any reason to doubt the opposing hypothesis is automatic evidence for their own views.

Diagnosis: Really as dense and deluded as they come, and his claims are laughable. It is unsurprising, but disconcerting, that his screeds have achieved the popularity they have achieved.

#1332: David Awbrey

$
0
0

Back in 2005 David Awbrey was appointed the Kansas State Department of Education Director of Communications, and as such he was at least partially responsible for the following stages in Kansas’s long-lasting creationist kerfuffles (the Kansas Board of Education chair was Steve Abrams, a noted creationist as well, by the way). As a staunch science denialist Awbrey tried his best to insert creationist talking points into the curricula of Kansas public schools. In fact, Awbrey did claim to be a theistic evolutionist, but whatever the case may be his antiscience attitude was never in doubt. “Scientists and science educators bring to the classroom their ‘religion’ which holds that humans are meaningless cosmic accidents as opposed to being God’s creation,” complained Awbrey, and for evidence? “Anyone see the origin, anyone see the Big Bang, anyone see the dinosaurs? These are all metaphysical speculations by people who look at the same evidence and disagree with what they see.” He also claimed that the scientists refused to engage in democratic processes – after all, Awbrey stated, only “[a] 26% minority in one of the polls (the Pew Foundation, I believe) believe the darwinist version,” and scientists apparently don’t acknowledge that.

Of course, Awbrey was hired for his rightwing political connections rather than his expertise (by Kansas Education Commissioner Bob Corkins, who didn’t have any qualifications other than rightwing antiscience attitudes either), and after a couple of embarrassing episodes like the ones mentioned he thankfully resigned. He is, in other words, probably rather harmless at present, but not for lack of trying.

He later wrote a book, Finding Hope in the Age of Melancholy, where he apparently laments the progress of science at the expense of religion.

Diagnosis: A minor fish, probably neutralized and mostly forgotten by now. Still worth a mention, methinks. 

#1333: Stephen B. Ayre

$
0
0

Few things attracks quackery like cancer, and insulin potentiation therapy is one of the dumbest, most dangerous “alternative” cancer therapies available. Though there is a number of practitioners out there, the leading proponent of IPT is perhaps Stephen B. Ayre, M.D. The basic idea is apparently that cancer cells like sugar and that insulin increases drug uptake. Using IPT therefore allows the patient to use less chemotherapy – which is unsupported by anything resembling evidence, but lack of evidence is no obstacle to certain altmed proponents. Instead they will administer a high dose of insulin, enough to drive the patient’s blood sugar down, at which point the patient is given chemotherapy (at subtherapeutic doses, since insulin allegedly decreases the amount of chemotherapy needed.) Finally, the patient is given glucose to bring the patient back from the hypoglycemia caused by the insulin. Unfortunately, people with no background in medicine will really often have no reason to think that IPT is insane idiocy (and dangerous); which surely helps the bullshit continuing to exist.

Ayre’s homepage admits that “while individual anecdotal case reports over forty years suggest that this treatment may be effective,” there is no evidence that the treatment has any beneficial effects whatsoever (nevertheless, he continues to promote it, which is exactly the kind of thing that earns him a place here). Chris Duffield at the website IPT.org furthermore discusses 19 “mechanisms proposed for how IPT works,” though even he is forced to admit that “no on knows really for sure.” Indeed. He also admits that “Many doctors and patients are looking for statistics, and we simply have to tell people that we do not have them. If they insist on having statistics, IPT is not yet for them. However, a lot of people have heard about IPT from friends, or have talked with doctors who have had excellent results with IPT. For some people, the IPT concept makes sense, and the reported benefits are so attractive, that they decide to give it a try.” Yes, even we are left pretty much speechless by that statement.

In short, IPT proponents have been treating patients for decades with no evidence whatsoever, and no plausible mechanism proposed for how or why it is supposed to work (at least three IPT providers, Russell Hunt (2007, Tennessee), Les Breitman (2012, California) and Juergen Winkler (2012, California)) have been disciplined by their state medical boards, but that’s just the tip of the iceberg). It’s bit like homeopathy for cancer, really.

Diagnosis: No, there is no end to the bullshit. For any problem you may experience, there are numerous crackpots lined up with suggestions ranging from the idiotic to the dangerous. Stephen Ayre is one of the more influential. Keep a safe distance.

#1334: Joseph Backholm

$
0
0

Joseph Backholm is the Executive Director of the Family Policy Institute of Washington. That institute promotes family values, and Backholm is accordingly also the leader of the Preserve Marriage Washington campaign to repeal Washington’s marriage equality law (those would be the wrong kind of families, of course). Backholm denies, of course, that the marriage equality movement is comparable to the civil rights movement because, according to Backholm, “today’s argument about the redefinition of marriage would be like the civil rights movement if the civil rights movement was an attempt to have black people be referred to as white people.” That’s a pretty tortured attempt to hide the fact that your motive is bigotry.

As most such activists Backholm warns against the consequences of marriage equality: persecution of Christians and those who disagree with marriage equality. Backholm is one of those who live a breathe a martyr complex, and in Backholm’s world the Christian majority is already persecuted, with the liberals just about to put him and his fellows in jail.

But then, Backholm thinks marriage equality will fail. It will fail because the case for same-sex marriage, he claims, doesn’t rely on logic. Instead, Blackholm said that unlike anti-gay activists, proponents of marriage equality depend on demonizing the opposition and “emotional manipulation” to win support.

Diagnosis: Sometimes you suspect him to be dimly aware of how feeble his efforts actually are, but those moment of self-realization, if they are there, are quickly swamped by rank bigotry, a well-developed persecution complex and dubiously coherent wingnut talking points. Sad.

#1335: Holly A. Bacon and anyone else who market black salves as cancer cures

$
0
0

Black salves” are corrosive agents that produce thick, dry scabs (“eschar” on the skin.) They can lead to substantial harm and damage. For that reason, a few crazy, delusional or frankly dishonest lunatics have concluded that they cure cancer and have marketed them accordingly. The idea that eschartics can “draw out” cancers from underneath the skin is so insane that it is barely worth commenting on it, but there is some evidence that people back in ancient times, perfectly ignorant of how things actually worked, would use these salves for similar health purposes.

Holly A. Bacon (of Cleansing Time Pro) is just one such individual, and probably not the most important one. Bacon had marketed “black salve” ointment and tablets with claims that both products were effective against all forms of cancer, as well as against hepatitus, HIV, SARS, and Avian Flu and other viruses, until stopped by the Federal Trade Commission. Other examples of black salve peddlers include Gregory Caton, who was sentenced to 33 months imprisonment in 2004 to be followed by 3 years supervised release for marketing several products with claims that they could cure cancer and other diseases. And in 2005, Lois March, M.D., a Georgia ear, nose, and throat specialist surrendered her medical license to settle charges (http://www.casewatch.org/board/med/march/march.shtml) that she improperly helped Dan Raber, an unlicensed person who treated patients for cancer by providing pain management to several patients whom Raber treated with a bloodroot paste (causing severe injuries). And, not the least, our old acquaintance, the horrid Andrew Weil, has apparently been a proponent of these “remedies”.

Other products in the category include the "Two Feathers salve".

Diagnosis: Sometimes it is hard to believe that these people are acting in good faith, but even if they are, the type and level of ignorance cannot reasonably be used to absolve them from moral culpability. Abhorrent monsters, all of them.

#1336: Dean Bailey

$
0
0

“Ex-gay” and anti-equality activist Dean Bailey is probably a minor figure overall, but he is associated with Peter LaBarbera, and is the author of the book Beyond the Shades of Gray: Because Homosexuality is a Symptom, Not a Solution, which even the blurb states is based on a (cherry-picked) literal reading of the Bible. It is hence unclear why it needed to be written – it is not that Bailey has anything new to offer – but I suppose he wished to add his voice to the noise. In any case, Bailey is, as mentioned, an “ex-gay” who has allegedly overcome his sinful proclivities and is currently very, very opposed to gays and homosexuality. To give you an example: In February 2014 Bailey raged over the fact that Google used rainbow colors for an Olympic theme, which according to Bailey is “homo-fascism.” Right. According to Bailey “the practice of sport is a human right,” and by not denouncing the disgusting homosexuals who “openly, publicly flaunt their sexuality, nudity, and every kind of immoral behavior imaginable,” Google is discriminating against Bailey. Yeah, that’s the line.

Diagnosis: Fuming bigot, whose hatred is so overwhelming that he is seemingly unable to hold a coherent thought for any amount of time. The results are rather predictble. We have some pity; but he still gets an entry.

#1337: Larry Bailey

$
0
0

Larry Bailey is the founder of Special Operations Speaks, one of many groups dedicated to attacking Obama on military issues based on a variety of conspiracy theories. Bailey is also a birther, claiming that Obama’s real father is Frank Marshall Davis, and that Obama was groomed by the powerful US communist lobby to take over the reins to implement communism in the US. At least Bailey “admits freely that [his] extensive efforts to mobilize special operations veterans and their supporters around the country is rooted in his personal dislike of the president and [his] desire to see him replaced.” He has already produced ads accusing Obama of leaking sensitive information, and is involved in promoting various conspiracy theories related to Benghazi based largely on thoroughly debunked delusions promoted by Fox News.

Bailey was also involved in Vietnam Vets for Truth, a 2004 campaign affiliated with the infamous Swift Boat Veterans for the Truth, and helped organize a “Kerry Lied” rally on Capitol Hill.

Diagnosis: Very much a predictable, whale.to-standard conspiracy theorist who would be laughed out of the room by any rational person – yet his rantings tend to show up also in more influential spreaders of bullshit spreaders like Fox News or Frank Gaffney because it serves their needs. As such, his is a name to watch.

#1338: James D. Baird & Laurie Nadel

$
0
0

“Epigenetics.” That’s something relatively new and exciting. And people don’t in general know precisely what it means, which is an opportunity for pseudoscientists of various stripes to suggest that it means whatever they (or their audience) want it to mean. Creationists has taken it to mean the demise of evolution. And then there are people like James D. Baird an Laurie Nadel, authors of the book Happiness Genes: Unlock the Positive Potential Hidden in Your DNA, which tells us that“[h]appiness is at your fingertips, or rather sitting in your DNA, right now! The new science of epigenetics reveals there are reserves of natural happiness within your DNA that can be controlled by you, by your emotions, beliefs and behavioral choices.” Yes. Epigenetics is a tool we can use to take control over our genome to tap its resources of fluff, Jesus, magic and the New Age.

Baird & Nadel are not alone. Joe Mercola has long been a fan, and according to Mercola scientists have proven that “you actually have a tremendous amount of control over how your genetic traits are expressed – from how you think to what you eat and the environment you live in” (and, by coincidence, you can purchase the supplements you need from him). One Krystal Plonski is surely not the only one to ask “Can the theory of epigenetics be linked to Naturopathic and Alternative Medicine?” and answer it in the affirmative (without any shred of a hint that she has the faintest clue what she is talking about). Mike Adams, of course, thinks that “Epigenetics reinforces theory that positive mind states heal,” though he doesn’t really “buy” the science (just the conclusions he wants to draw). Even Der Spiegel did a ten page feature on epigenetics some time ago with the title “The victory over the genes. Smarter, healthier, happier. How we can outwit our genome,” which suggests that someone at Der Spiegel treats her or his spam folder as a collection of press releases.

Diagnosis: Well, I suppose we didn’t cover Baird and Nadel in much detail, but we did give their pseudoscience as much space as it could conceivably warrant. Theirs is also but one example of how promoters of woo and pseudoscience attempt to exploit new discoveries in science without any interest in actually understanding the discoveries. Which of course would once again illustrate the fundamental dishonesty of woo if any further demonstration were needed.
Viewing all 2359 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>