Quantcast
Channel: Encyclopedia of American Loons
Viewing all 2331 articles
Browse latest View live

#1082: Terry Rondberg

$
0
0

There are many roads to fame and fortune, and among the least honorable is the way chosen by Terry A. Rondberg. Rondberg has made a name for himself as among the most unhinged woomeisters in the chiropractic profession. He is president of the World Chiropractic Alliance (WCA), which claims to be “the only major chiropractic organization which passionately defends the rights of subluxation-based doctors and will stand up against those who would corrupt chiropractic by denying its philosophical and vitalistic foundations,” and believes that spinal adjustment should begin at birth and continue for life even in the absence of symptoms. He is also founder the Vertebral Subluxation Research Institute (VSRI) and president of Chiropractic Benefit Services, a malpractice company that insures subluxation-based chiropractors and publishes in various questionable venues, including WCA News/Health Watch, a weekly electronic newsletter that attacks what it considers to be “the dangers and abuses of medical and drug interests,” usually translatable as “the threat posed by evidence- and science-based practices to the possibility of justifying Rondberg’s own practices” (which are, needless to say, not remotely related to neither evidence nor science). VSRI is particularly famous for teaching chiropractors how to recruit “research volunteers” and convert them into lifetime chiropractic patients through telemarketing and other, less legal and ethical practices (described, together with the similar practices of Tedd Koren, here).

And yes, Rondberg and his followers are the kind of chiropractors who claim that, well, pretty much any ailment or health problem is located in the spine.

Rondberg and the WCA were heavily involved in the AzScam scandal in 1991, and their practices have been widely condemned, even by other chiropractics organizations. In the eyes of Rondberg and the WCA they are of course persecuted by powerful enemies, and have launched aggressive countercampaigns.

In addition to Rondberg and his wife Cindy, prominent WCA persons include Vice President Timothy J. Feuling and Director of Communication Barbara Bigham, just in case you should ever come across any of these names elsewhere. There is a good discussion of veterinary chiropractic practice, where WCA’s dubious ideas are discussed as well, here. Rondberg is of course also an antivaxxer, to the extent and degree of hysteric insanity that his screeds on the topic have been picked up by whale.to.

Diagnosis: Woo comes no more belligerent than this, and Rondberg’s organization still presents a significant threat to health and well-being. His actions are, on all levels, indistinguishable from evil.

#1083: Wayne Allyn Root

$
0
0

Wayne Allyn Root was the 2008 Libertarian Party vice-presidential nominee and is currently a radio personality, author (a variety of books on gambling, as well as The Conscience of a Libertarian: Empowering the Citizen Revolution with God, Guns, Gold & Tax Cuts), television producer and political commentator with stints at CNBC and FoxNews.com; his columns appear across the range of wingnut websites and media outlets, from Townhall to the Moonie Times. He has also announced that he intends to run as a Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate from Nevada in 2016, which should strike one as an unintentional plan to reconstruct the successful campaign of Sharron Angle.

Root’s political views are characterized by intense conspiracy theories. Not being particularly happy with Obama, Root doesn’t only think Obama is wrong, but that he is working to intentionally ruin the economy as a means of destroying the country based on a plan that Obama learned while attending Columbia University; the goal, of course, is to turn the US into a communist country. Though Obama may seemmoderate, according to Root, “in reality, he's a Communist.” He’s just very good at avoiding disclosing any possible evidence of that. (Root, however, relies on his powers of intuition to circumvent the lack of evidence.) Similarly, in a commentary published by The Blaze in 2012, Root – an avowed birther – speculated that Barack Obama attended Columbia University as a foreign exchange student, citing his “gut instinct” as evidence.

With such nefarious motives, how did Obama ever win the presidential elections? Thanks for asking: Through massive voter fraud, of course. In 2012 the Democrats won by voting up to 10 times each, says Root, citing the Philadelphia myth as evidence, a claim so ridiculous that it has been debunked even by the wingnut anti-voter fraud group True the Vote.

With conspiracy theories comes paranoia, and Root has actually claimed that the IRS is going to kill him with Obamacare, just as the Obamacare death panels will ensure the death of anyone affiliated with the Tea Party. In league with the IRS are a number of liberal TV show hosts, who are deliberately trying to take him out by … well, directly quoting what he actually says, mostly. Which again is evidence that his conspiracy theories are correct, of course. And so it goes.

Diagnosis: Good grief.

#1084: Lila Rose

$
0
0

Lila Rose is a pro-life activist infamous and notorious for her dishonesty and willingness to use any immoral tactic possible to further her cause. In 2006 she and a friend began conducting so-called “sting” operations at Planned Parenthood clinics posing as abortion-seeking 13-year-olds impregnated by adult men in order to try to entrap clinic counselours into saying things that made it look like they are okay with letting statutory rape go unreported. The sessions are secretly taped, whereupon Rose cherry picks the ones where something out of line is said and edits the juiciest parts into “exposé” videos that she posts on YouTube; it is discussed here. Here is the wingnut mythology Rose’s actions belong to; and yes, it is pretty much the kind of thing you find on whale.to. According to herself, she is battling the “lie of Satan” that is (apparently) Planned Parenthood – “he [Satan and/or Planned Parenthood] doesn’t want our nation to be a nation under God.”

In 2006, she collaborated with the even more infamous conservative provocateur James O’Keefe, recording calls O’Keefe made to Planned Parenthood clinics posing as a racist interested in making a donation “specifically for the abortions of African-American babies”, intending to find “evidence” for the notion that Planned Parenthood (“the single most evil organization in human history”) was founded by Margaret Sanger, an advocate of eugenics (true), with the intent of wiping out the black race (false). Though her strikingly consistent failures to uncover Planned Parenthood’s involvement in illegal activities should, if Rose were rational, suggest to her that her conspiracy theories may be wrong, it is not particularly surprising that it doesn’t.*

Despite the evident failures (repeatedly and consistently) of her sting operations Rose has managed to raise to a position of some influence in the wingnut movement (she contributed to the 2012 Values Voter Summit, for instance), and has been given ample opportunities to make her positions clear. Here, for instance, she equates the anti-abortion movement with the women’s rights movements and the revolutionary war (as well as to ending Nazism and slavery and – never one to miss an opportunity to compare herself to anyone who gets a positive press at any moment – Malala Yousafzai), and has claimed that abortion providers are just as bad as the Taliban (a strikingly inept analogy). Currently she leads the organization Live Action, which has for instance endorsed the actions of cult leader Jered Ragon.

She has also been involved in protesting Obamacare since it is a tyrannical violation of religious freedom, or something.

Diagnosis: Conspiracy theories fuelled by religious fundamentalism are never innocuous, but Rose’s version is particularly insidious given her utterly dishonest – and, one suspects, rather effective – tactics. Dangerous.

*Note: Rose is indicted here for her conspiracy theories, not her opposition to abortion. Although the author personally think abortion is morally justifiable (and at least that the legality of abortion is morally justifiable), based for instance on arguments along the lines of those presented in Judith Jarvis Thomson’s famous article, we recognize that taking a different position is itself far from crazy. That said, there is no doubt that the so-called prolife movement is also riddled with blathering lunatics, and Rose is a fine example. 

#1085: Chris Rosebrough

$
0
0

A.k.a. Pirate Christian

Chris Rosebrough is a reformed pastor and host of the Pirate Christian Radio and the radio show podcast Fighting For The Faith. Apparently he’s something of a notorious figure among certain groups of fundies, though he hasn’t quite managed to make a big media impact beyond the inner rings of the Taliban. Still, he deserves a quick mention: Rosebrough’s anti-gay activities and positions are stock of the trade. More novel (well, reactionary) is his opposition to ordaining women priests. After all, the ministry is a boy’s club and has always been so (what about the famous female apostle Junia, mentioned in Romans 16:7? Ah, according to Rosebrough she wasreally a man as well; evidence? It sits better with his position). And as for science? “I see no evidence in scripture that humanity evolved from apes via random chance and ‘survival of the fittest’,” says Rosebrough, which is strictly speaking true but in the context suggests that he entertains a lot of other, radically idiotic beliefs.

Mildly interestingly, Rosebrough has been in some disputes with the notorious Rick Warren, in particular over the fact that Warren, who calls himself Rupert Murdoch’s pastor, has failed to call Murdoch out on the latter’s “owning, expanding and profiting from pornographic channels.” If that's your main moral concern with Murdoch, you should reconsider your priorities.

Diagnosis: Well, this is in no way an in-depth coverage; Rosebrough remains to obscure to those outside of the fundie movement. That he is a fanatic loon is not in doubt, however. 

#1086: Ilena Rosenthal

$
0
0

Ilena Rosenthal runs an Internet-based support group for women who believes they have medical problems as a result of breast implants. Her rantings are, shall we say, less than ideally attuned to evidence, reality and reason (meaning that it is, for the most part, semi-coherent, quasi-religious nonsense that has, at least at some point, been promoted by Mercola). As a promoter of quackery and bullshit Rosenthal is merely one of very, very many. Her fame, however, is connected to a landmark court case over her characterizations of Stephen Barrett of Quackwatch and Terry Polevoy of Canadian Quackery Watch. Rosenthal dismissed Barrett as “arrogant, bizarre, closed-minded; emotionally disturbed, professionally incompetent, intellectually dishonest, a dishonest journalist, sleazy, unethical, a quack, a thug, a bully, a Nazi, a hired gun for vested interests, the leader of a subversive organization, and engaged in criminal activity (conspiracy, extortion, filing a false police report, and other unspecified acts)”, and Polevoy as “dishonest, closed-minded; emotionally disturbed, professionally incompetent, unethical, a quack, a fanatic, a Nazi, a hired gun for vested interests, the leader of a subversive organization, and engaged in criminal activity (conspiracy, stalking of females, and other unspecified acts) and has made anti-Semitic remarks.” The accusations reflect the general quality of Rosenthal’s scholarship, and in particular her rather bizarre relationship with the distinction between reality and imagination.

Importantly, the courts ruled the statements not defamatory. That may, in fact, have been the correct decision. It doesn’t make Rosenthal less of a loon.

Diagnosis: An annoying source of unalloyed lunacy, though it may in fact be argued - on the grounds of the court case - that her contributions to the human effort are not, on balance, negative(!)

One Marshall Rosenthal deserves a mention for this screed, though a separate entry is probably too much.

#1087: Gordon Ross

$
0
0

There is a noted (though hypothetical and tongue-in-cheek) connection between engineers and woo – in all types of conspiracy theories, and in every type of denialist and anti-science group, there will be a large group of engineers involved. In reality this is probably partly because engineers are (generally) not trained as scientists. It is probably also partly because there are quite a lot of engineers around.

In any case, Gordon Ross is a mechanical engineer and “Scholar for Truth”, i.e. a 9/11 truther. He is most famous, perhaps, for conducting investigations that purportedly show that World Trade Center buildings 1 and 2 would resist the collapse once started if the official stories blaming the collapses on plane crashes were correct. His conclusion is wrong because Ross fails to understand some rather simple and basic concepts of physics and engineering, as pointed out here, here and here, as well as basic logic, and failing miserably on the facts in the process. Together with Craig T. Furlong Ross has also written a paper claiming that an explosion at the WTC was recorded by seismic instruments before the first aircraft impact, committing a rather epic fail in the process (Furlong, by the way, appears to have renounced trooferism later on).

Ross is of course not the only engineer involved in the truther movement. We have already covered Richard Gage of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Other expert structural engineers associated with that group include Charles Pegelow, who thinks nuclear weapons destroyed the towers, and Robert T. Mote, who thinks the tower collapses started from the bottom (“I could never understand the ‘convenient’ vertical collapse at the BASE due to an extreme event at height”). Structural engineer Dennis Kollar, on his side, has pointed out that “[f]or me the most convincing aspect that the 911 collapse was a controlled demolition is the recorded explosions on the 9/11 Eyewitness DVD” (the “recorded explosions” he is referring to are wind noise captured by the camera in Hoboken, a few miles away from the WTC, something that is overwhelmingly obvious to anyone who has seen footage from close to the WTC, where what would be absolutely enormous “explosions” are not captured by any microphones). Structural engineer Michael Donley, on the other hand, says that he has “read the FEMA report and conclude that it is incomplete at best and a cover-up at worst” (he hasn’t read the NIST report, though). Engineer Edward Knesl says that “[w]e do not know the phenomenon of the high rise building to disintegrate internally faster than the free fall of the debris coming down from the top,” showing that he has not bothered to review videos of the collapses. In a feeble attempt to top these morons, AE 911 Truth engineer Donald Messerlian has plumped for: “[s]eismographic evidence proved pre-planted explosives destroyed WTC 1, 2 and building 7 before the planes struck buildings 1 & 2.” To repeat: The three WTC buildings were destroyed before the planes hit. Messerlian has, in other words, plumped for the “no plane” idea: “After performing some in-depth research on this subject, I have come to the conclusion that no commercial airplanes impacted the two WTC Towers. No commercial plane impacted the Pentagon. No commercial aircraft buried itself in Pennsylvania terra firma.” Indeed. (Thanks to this site for this list of morons).

Diagnosis: Incompetence galore, and it is interesting to see how adherence to a conspiracy theory makes these people forget even the basic skills associated with their own profession. Moderately dangerous when they come in bulks, however. 

#1088: Xzavia Ross

$
0
0

Xzavia Ross is the public information officer for Affinity Lifestyles, the producers of Real Water®, one of the more audacious woo-based marketing ploys there is. According to Real Water® the water that is delivered to your house is “damaged” by being “stripped of electrons(-)” as it travels “through pipes, filtration systems, and various devices”. This allegedly makes the water “positive(+) ionized” and “very acidic”. Solution? Buy their water instead. Real Water is, according to the company, filtered and sterilized municipal water with the addition of “potassium and magnesium”. The patented “E2 electron energized technology” process is claimed to add “hundreds of millions of free electrons” to “unclump” the water and give it an alkaline pH. The “clumping” purportedly prevents the water from hydrating our cells; in fact the molecules are left as “basically free radicals” that “literally [sic] zap or pull away life force from the cell.” The product is also available as a concentrate (!).

Unfortunately, it is a bit unclear how they achieve their results; according to Ross “[o]ur process is proprietary so there really is no way we can disclose the process by which we add electrons to the water,” but at least the company asserts that“many food and beverages ... are devoid of electrons.” The “science articles” section on their website was unfortunately “coming soon”; currently there is only a "further reading" section with no references.

There is a nice discussion of the product here.

If you’re really into committing yourself to something horrible you can also sign up with the Whole Wellness Club, a multi-level marketing scheme that is “bringing people together” and selling this product.

Diagnosis: It is rather difficult to convince oneself that these people are acting in good faith. It is also difficult to judge their actions as more laudable if they are, indeed, acting in good faith. You should stay well clear of them in either case.

For the sake of completeness founder and CEO Chuck Dhuey of Whole Wellness Club also fits that diagnosis rather well. 

#1089: Lyle Rossiter

$
0
0

Lyle Rossiter is a forensic psychiatrist who has done a great deal of work examining the liberal mind, attempting to explain the liberal’s “extravagant political demands, in his furious protests against economic freedom, in his arrogant contempt for morality, in his angry defiance of civility, in his bitter attacks on freedom of association, in his aggressive assault on individual liberty.” That’s how he understands “liberal”. Little wonder that he concludes that liberals are mentally ill – and not in the sense of American loons or Michael Savage, but literally mentally ill.

In other words, the presupposition for his research is: “My political views are so obviously correct that anyone who doesn’t accept them must be mentally ill;” in other words, he presupposes a right-wing political outlook and then tries to explain why other people do not accept this truth by mental illness: “[The liberal’s] neurosis is evident in his ideals and fantasies; in his self-righteousness, arrogance and grandiosity [indeed, Rossiter]; in his self-pity; in his demands for indulgence and exemption from accountability; in his claims to entitlements; in what he gives and withholds; and in his protests that nothing done voluntarily is enough to satisfy him.”

Indeed, the liberal mind is “a massive transference neurosis acted out in the world’s political arenas, with devastating effects on the institutions of liberty.” Rossiter apparently does not understand the notion of “transference”, but I am not sure this is the main shortcoming of his attempt to deconstruct strawmen. His “findings” (i.e. rants) are summed up in his book The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness, which seems to have been rejected by most academic publishers. Joan Swirsky, a fan, praised it for avoiding “all the usual psychobabble”, which it managed to do in virtue of not containing anything remotely related to science whatsoever. Currently Rossiter is calling for violent rebellion against the mentally ill.

Diagnosis: Two can play this game, Lyle, and out-diagnosing you as a moronic blubberhead is just as scientific as your own rantings; the difference is that we avoid strawmen, and the diagnosis is accurate and set based on evidence rather than psychological projection. 

#1090: Ariel Adrean Roth

$
0
0

You will hardly find a better example of cargo cult science than flood geology (though baraminology and homeopathy are strong contenders), and the Swiss-born Ariel Adrean Roth is among its leading proponents. Roth is, in fact, a zoologist, and former professor and chairman of Biology at Emmanuel Missionary College (now Andrews University, a small, extremist, Pentecostal college offering non-accredited education that also hosts “creationist geneticist” Lane Lester) and at Loma Linda University – he is also the former director of the Seventh-day Adventist-run Geoscience Research Institute at Loma Linda – institutions that anyone who actually wants an educations would do well to stay very clear of. Roth is also former editor of the journal Origins, signatory to the CMI list of scientists alive today who accept the biblical account of creation, author of Origins, Linking Science and Scripture, and contributor to In Six Days: Why Fifty Scientists Choose to Believe in Creation.

Roth is perhaps most familiar for his contributions to the side of loon in various court cases concerning creationism in public education, notably with “a precursor of” Michael Behe’s debunked irreducible complexity arguments (really just Paley’s old argument from design). In the early 70s he argued before the California Board of Education that creationism should be taught in public classromms (and with Leonard Brand, the current chair of of Loma Linda’s Department of Earth and Biological Sciences, he has tried to redefine “science” in a tortured manner to make it encompass creationism). He also tried his hand in McLean v. Arkansas Board of Education, trying to argue that evolution is a religion, too, but had to admit that “[i]f you want to define ‘science; as testable, predictable” then creation science is not really science and that there is no scientific evidence for the God of the Bible. His attempt to argue that evolution is unfalsifiable as well failed to impress since evolution is demonstrably falsifiable.

Diagnosis: And so it goes. The list of delusional cargo cult scientists willing to reject all their training and knowledge when faced with something that challenges cherished religious convictions is a rather long one. Roth is a minor player, I suppose – and old – but loony enough to deserve mention.

#1091: Laurie Roth

$
0
0

According to herself, Laurie Roth is “the Annie Oakley of the Airwaves”, but the comparison doesn’t automatically strike you if you tune in to The Roth Show. Roth also writes for Alan Keyes’s Renew America, where she has made a career for herself as an incoherently batshit crazy conspiracy theorist.

Roth is, of course, a birther. His origins, to Roth, explain why Obama always sides with radical Muslims who support Sharia law. According to Roth, “Obama is a radical Communist/Islamist and has always hated what the real America represents,” who has a “clear and thought-out methodology” for achieving his invidious goal, as well as “international Islamic support. He has always mysteriously had billions of dollars in backing.” Indeed “[i]t is most clear that Obama, from birth, was the chosen destroyer of America. Believe what you want, but the large sea of facts support this, from the massive millions spent to hide all Obama’s documents – falsifying his birth records, use of false social security cards, and hiding college records. Think about it a second. Have you ever heard of any U.S. president ever spending millions to hide every detail of his life from the people?” No, Roth’s got a point there. In fact, in January 2012, Roth was named as a plaintiff in a lawsuit against President Barack Obama in Georgia, represented by none other than Orly Taitz, challenging Obama’s eligibility to run for president of the United States (among the host of other plaintiffs, by the way, we also note the familiar name of Carl Swensson; hi, Carl). The case was not particularly successful.

Even more tastelessly, Roth is a Sandy Hook truther. According to Roth the shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School were a false flag operation by Obama to push through gun control (which can’t have been judged to have been particularly successful), and she has repeatedly been discussing “the endless discrepancies with the ‘Sandy Hook event’” on her show, through what to most people would immediately sound like a tasteless parody of the kinds of “discussions of discrepancies” offered by 9/11 truthers.

She has (but of course) also weighed in zeh gays, calling for the restoration of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell to stop President Obama from attempting to “terrorize” and “destroy” military service members by “raping their freedom of speech [not further explained] and religious rights.” Homosexuality also leads directly to bestiality, since Roth is utterly unable to perceive relevant distinctions or why reason is a good thing.

Roth has also run for president, no less. In 2011 she sought the 2012 presidential nomination of the Constitution Party, but failing that battle got the nomination of the American Independent Party in November 2011 instead (yes, George Wallace’s old party). She dropped out of the race in July 2012, but it is hard to say whether anyone noticed.

Diagnosis: So staggeringly crazy that she doesn’t even recognize that Orly Taitz is a loon. No, she’s far from alone. People do listen to her. But come on.

Note: I assume that Laurie A. Roth of Retunetojoy.com”, a sound/ energy-vibrational healer who has helped many other healers accelerate, understand and open their Light based healing abilities’” and who has a gift of pre-cognitive dreaming”, is a different person, though they share some of the same meticulous care for evidence, reason, and reality. Would be interesting if they met someday.

#1092: Sid Roth

$
0
0

Sid Roth is a Messianic Jew who runs the website “It’s Supernatural” (google it yourself) devoted to converting Jews to Christ and promote all sorts of flimsy endtimes babble and miracle reports. You can also buy plenty of books (e.g. Stories of Supernatural Healing, coauthored with Linda Josef, “Ph.D”) and educational material, for instance a delectable Personal Trainer for Tongues, which invites you “to discover how easy it is to pray in tongues” and teaches you how to “prophesy your destiny”, “increase your revelation of God’s Word” (I have no idea what it is supposed to mean), charge “your spiritual battery” and activate angels. The articles on the site encompass all the usual topics; if you should want to, you can for instance read how L.A. Marzulli has “uncovered an amazing cover-up by the U.S. government and Smithsonian Institute to hide evidence Darwinism and ‘evolution’ have been disproven. Instead it supports what the Bible says!” (Roth claims that he originally thought the theory of evolution sounded reasonable, but later discovered the holes – heard that before?) Roth’s conversation with James Nienhuis concerning science, young earth creationism and global warming may give you an idea of how well he understands what he is promoting. One of his videos purporting to explain evolution and promoted by the WND is discussed here; it features … Bruce Malone. Also promoted by the WND is his video on how to change your DNA with genetic salvation, whatever that means (Francis Myles, who enthusiastically promotes the idea, sure doesn’t know).

Diagnosis: I am not going to give him too much space. Roth is just your standard liar for Jesus, and that’s really it – the only notable feature being how he couches his fire-and-brimstone fanaticism in a language borrowed from New Age personal development bullshit. Idiot, and a minor player on religious fanaticism’s anti-science team. 

#1093: Hal Rounds

$
0
0

Hal Rounds is an attorney, Tea Party leader and spokesperson (Tennessee), and a wingnut’s wingnut – though, really, the whole group has to be indicted for their suggestions concerning education policy. The educational platform for Rounds and his group is historical revisionism and sanitization, and suggests in particular that history textbooks should cover up nasty things like America’s treatment of natives and slavery because it makes past leaders look like hypocrites. In other words, history should not try to depict historical events accurately – instead, it should be replaced with hagiography to ensure that children won’t be exposed to anything that could lead them to question American exceptionalism: “No portrayal of minority experience in the history which actually occurred shall obscure the experience or contributions of the Founding Fathers, or the majority of citizens, including those who reached positions of leadership,” as they put it. According to Rounds, the group wants to address “an awful lot of made-up criticism about, for instance, the founders intruding on the Indians or having slaves or being hypocrites in one way or another.” Rounds’s group doesn’t seem to have been particularly stable or significant, and seems in fact to have more or less disbanded later on. Still.

Diagnosis: Minor moron, and probably relatively insignificant, although his views on education are more widely shared than is comfortable.

#1094: Karen Rowe et al.

$
0
0
Karen Rowe

Acupuncture doesn’t work, and integrating acupuncture with homeopathy doesn’t exactly help. Karen Rowe thinks otherwise. By adding homeopathy to acupuncture Rowe came up with “acupoint injection therapy,” which is so idiotic that it landed one of its practitioners an appearance on The Dr. Oz. Show. The idea is to inject homeopathic remedies into acupuncture meridian points, and according to Rowe “what makes this system of medicine so remarkably effective is that it is one of the few therapies that is administered directly into the matrix of the body,” which is about as accurate and meaningful a claim as it sounds. The goal is … you guessed it … to detoxify your body.

Akhila Bourne
Of course people have taken acupuncture even further. There is, for instance, Russ Greenfields “biopuncture”, and Akhila Rosemary Bourne & Manohar Croke promote something they call … colorpuncture – esogetic colorpuncture, in fact. The guiding idea is that “we know today that man is essentially a being of light. And the modern science of photobiology ... is presently proving this.” Right. “In terms of healing ... the implications are immense. We now know, for example, that ... light can initiate, or arrest, cascade-like reactions in the cells, and that genetic cellular damage can be virtually repaired, within hours, by faint beams of light.” Actually, I don’t think Bourne & Croke know what “know” means.
Manohar Croke
Colorpuncture consists of shining colored lights on acupuncture points. Nothing more is needed, since esogetic colorpuncture is designed to “address the non-physical origins of illness as well as its physical symptoms.” Indeed.

Diagnosis: Loonery and quackery without limits, and it is rather hard to believe that these practitioners actually believe that their techniques work. They surely cannot describe the mechanisms in anything resembling a coherent, accurate manner, and can definitely not provide evidence that stand up to even the most charitable scrutiny. 

#1095: Gary & Lisa Ruby

$
0
0

We’ll actually let Marco Rubio off in virtue of the benefit of the doubt. His pronounciations on the age of the Earth would admittedly qualify him, though one suspect opportunism rather than intellectual commitment (as one does in most of the stuff Rubio is saying or doing, in fact) – that goes for his backpedalling as well. We’ll harass the little people instead.

Gary & Lisa Ruby run the website Liberty to the Captives, a relentlessly fanatically religious website devoted to promoting conspiracy theories, woo and pure fantasy, from the nephilim to the New World Order; it isn’t onegroup that’s behind the New World Order, but everyone from the scientologists (here is their article “Terri Schiavo and scientology – the Death Connection”) to RaptureReady (!). It is worth a visit. They have, for instance, a section on how Harry Potter and The Lord of the Ringslure kids to practice witchcraft – as do promoters of essential oils, apparently, and prayer circles (“praying with hands clasped to form a circle is not found in the Bible. This practice, adopted by churches around the world, comes directly from witchcraft”). Indeed, even Tim LaHaye’s Left Behind series is covert promotion of witchcraft, according to the Rubys; apparently the series even promotes equipping people with microchips – how’s that for Satan worship?). And of course Obamacare is “stealth euthanasia” (as Rob Panzer says: “When patients enter hospice simply because they are elderly, weak or forgetful, it is a red flag that something definitely is not right”) – there is even a link to witchcraft in Obamacare, as demonstrated by Michelle Obama’s involvement with voodoo.

In other words, there is a simple way to sum up the theological position of the Rubys. Everyone who disagrees with them, whether it is on politics or theology, are really promoters of witchcraft and the New World Order. Christian rock? Check. No Greater Joy ministries (that’s Michael & Debi Pearl)? Indeed.

Diagnosis: You get the gist. These people should be avoided at more or less all costs.

#1096: Peter Ruckman

$
0
0

We have encountered the rabid King James Only fanatics before (indeed, even last entry’s Gary and Lisa Ruby belong to the movement), and Peter Ruckman is a big name. Ruckman, a graduate of Bob Jones University, is also the founder of the Pensacola Bible Institute, another unaccredited Taliban institution (not to be confused with Pensacola Christian College) in Pensacola, Florida, a place that has managed to establish itself as an epicenter of loon in the US (Kent Hovind was long a proud inhabitant). As is characteristic for his movement, Ruckman believes that the King James Version constitutes “advanced revelation” and is the final, preserved word of God for English speakers, since the Holy Ghost apparently considered it to be particularly important to have a good English version.

His evidence for the superiority of the King James version is on the slim side, however. According to Ruckman, “Mistakes in the A.V. 1611 are advanced revelation!” meaning that with regard to any details on which said version of the Bible disagrees with older versions, his version of KJ is right, and we should conclude that the older versions must have been corrupted. In other words, Ruckman’s views are as evidence-based and unfalsifiable as your standard David Icke conspiracy theory. He also thinks that the Septuagint, the Tanakh of Hellenistic Judaism and the Old Testament of Eastern Christianity, were hoaxes. Indeed, by claiming that the KJ is not only equal to but superior to existing Hebrew and Greek manuscripts, Ruckman has placed himself on the fringes of the KJ only movement, which is not a sign of mental health. His writings nevertheless remain popular, partially because of his caustic style and dismissals of those who disagree with him in rather colorful ways.

Given Ruckman’s relationship with evidence, you should expect him to entertain some other beliefs that would be located outside of the mainstream as well. And sure enough, Ruckman delivers. He has written about his UFO beliefs (“specifically blue aliens with blue blood, black aliens with green blood, and gray aliens with clear blood”), claiming e.g. that“some of the medieval plagues in Europe were caused by UFOs”, and he is apparently convinced that the CIA has implanted brain transmitters in children, old people, and African-Americans and that the agency operates underground alien breeding facilities. They are of course also out to get him (Ruckman), since by exposing their nefarious ploys Ruckman has apparently become a serious threat. To intimidate him they use black helicopters carrying UN troops, which are “circling your homes” with the mission of attacking and imprisoning the populace – yes, Ruckman believes in (literally) black helicopters, which is sort of like literally believing that tinfoil hats protect you from alien mind reading (which Ruckman may very well believe, in fact). There are also some musings about Atlantis and the Bermuda Triangle in his writings, but it is hard for the casual reader to obtain a fully coherent picture.

In 1984 Ruckman received some attention for writing that “Negroes have to be carried. Where they are left to themselves they resort to mugging, rape, slavery, dope traffic, and eventually cannibalism,” and (much more recently) some attention for his belief that “no matter how much integration is carried out, the IQ of blacks is always lower than whites,” and (currently) his belief that “history is absolute proof that ‘race-mixers’ are mentally sick.” Other examples of racism in Ruckman’s work are discussed here (his claim that “prejudice is a permanent trait of colored people,” and that “all black people are racists. They have color-consciousness that affects every decision they make in life, and they make decisions on the basis of color,” reveal a level of self-awareness that is borderline unusual).

Diagnosis: He may be wrong, but at least he has made sure that he is wrong in as charming a manner as possible. Probably a negligible threat to civilization in the grand scheme of things, but his writings seem to enjoy rather staggering popularity in some less savory segments of the population.

#1097: Walt Ruloff

$
0
0

Newsmax may occasionally rival the WND for wingnuttery and conspiracy mongering, but one sometimes suspects that Christopher Ruddy is more like a Roger Ailes than a Joseph Farah. Then, of course, there is Eric Robert Rudolph, but he is not exactly running loose. A case could perhaps be made for including Debra Rufini, who is certainly sufficiently crazy, but does not quite merit a separate entry (though not for lack of crazy).

No, let’s return to standard fare. Walt Ruloff is standard fare. Ruloff is an evangelical billionaire, partner in Premise Media, and one of the producers of and main backers behind that perceptive and paradigm-shifting (though not quite successful) scientific exploration Expelled, a documentary that wouldn’t have been what it is without Ruloff’s generous financial input, and which Ruloff and others involved hoped to use to help pass so-called Academic Freedom Bills across the US. (After all, we don’t want to do like Hitler, do we? Surely not?) Here, by the way, is what “academic freedom” actually seems to mean for the creationists. Ruloff's honesty has been questioned on several scores. He is also the proud recipient of the coveted Pigasus Award, category Funding (he shared it with the films other producers, Logan Craft and John Sullivan).

After his career in the movies, Ruloff seems to have been content partaking in various pseudo-science seminars and giving talks on stuff he knows nothing about.

Diagnosis: A major source of anti-civilization efforts. Keep your distance.

#1098: Erik Rush

$
0
0

A.k.a. The otherRush

Erik Rush is an extreme-right pundit, conspiracy theorist and contributor to Fox News, WND and Canada Free Press, as well as a pretty much essential entry in any Encyclopedia of loons – wingnuttery doesn’t come more wingnut than Erik Rush. It isn’t very hard to predict Rush’s opinions on a range of issues, but in 2012 Rush seems to have started a campaign to consecutively outcrazy himself in every column he wrote, which has led to some mildly interesting and novel results (this one is pretty good).

Obama, communism and tyranny
Of course, in Rush’s mind Obama is a Marxist extremist (he never explains in what respect) and totalitarian (ditto), who ascended to power through voter fraud (he offers no evidence). The founding fathers would have hanged him and most of today’s politicians (also here and here), and Harry Reid “deserves” to be dragged behind a truck. Apparently the occasion for the latter outburst was the 2013 fiscal cliff negotiations and the possibility of new gun laws, which Rush warned are both part of a global plot by Marxists, corporations and bankers (duh) to destroy America. It doesn’t even seem to be for personal gain (but his communism is enough to warrant Obama’s imprisonment for Rush, out of respect for the Constitution’s explicitly anti-marxist message). Indeed, it seems that Rush assumes that Obama’s goal is to copy “Mao, Lenin , Stalin and Castro – men who murdered hundreds of millions in their ascent to total dominion over their respective nations,” to establish his dictatorship just because it is evil (Rush has, after all, wondered whether Obama is a member of a Satanic cult together with Jay-Z and Beyoncé – he has the information “on very good authority”, and Obama is a lot like Damien, the demonic kid from The Omen, though Rush doesn’t go into details). Obama’s communist plot is apparently so evil and destructive that“most of the ‘New World Order’ scenarios do not hold water in light of this,” but only Rush knows the truth! Just look at how Obama orchestrated the Benghazi attacks for … well, the purpose is a bit nebulous, but it could be for the pure heck of it (Obama later supported Boko Haram BECAUSE BENGHAZI). Or how “narcissistic sociopath” Obama used government shutdown to “usurp complete power”. And in fact, it isn’t only about ruining America. Obama is also part of a communist government-media-law school conspiracy tobring about the End Times.

Who is responsible for these sordid states of affairs? At least Rush has gone so far as to claim that liberal journalists should be tried for treason since liberal journalists “largely facilitated the ascension of Barack Obama”, thereby helping to violate the Constitution (of course, the fact that supporting violations of the Constitution is precisely what he himself suggests in that very column doesn’t quite register – these accusations apply to the others, those Rush disagrees with, not himself). To complement the call, Rush also warned, after Obama’s reelection, that the Obama administration will try to prosecute conservatives and that Obama “might be on drugs”, and called on journalists, who should be in jail, to stop him. Such prosecution (already happening, apparently – some people criticize Rush, which means that they are violating his freedom of speech) will be preceded by Obama intentionally sinking the economy to create “civil unrest,” which will then give him “the chance to shore up and perhaps even test his nascent totalitarian infrastructure” and implement “martial law or something like it”. One surmises that it is also his love for the Constitution and the democratic process that motivates his call for Americans to “go to any length” to facilitate a violent removal of Obama and his allies through violent revolution (also here). He particularly called on the Military to help, in part because he interprets Obama’s political positions as constituting treason by nature.

It wasn’t only the press that helped Obama get elected, though. He was elected partially because America suffers (it’s apparently America’s central problem) from an excess of “negrophilia” (there are, for instance, too many blacks on television – Rush has also argued that the white man colonized Africa because the people there “gave the impression” that they were “only a few steps out of the trees” and wondered whether South Africa was better off under apartheid). Also, liberals are pushing a “culture of death” and “deviance” in order to destroy America, and he has written extensively about the ostensible causal mechanisms – apparently the left’s alleged depravity “has its roots in true supernatural evil,” as the leaders on the left are “influenced by malevolent forces.” He also warns that mind control is at work and leading to mass killings: “While I haven’t discounted the possibility of mind-control protocols having been employed on certain individuals lately, I believe it is altogether possible that some of the seemingly random violence we are witnessing may have its genesis in the influence to which I refer.”

Then there is the lamentable ignorance of the American population. It is worth quoting Rush at length: “For example, it does not take any advanced training in economics to make the determination that the Obama administration is as fiscally irresponsible as it could possibly be. This is not a wild accusation; the 1974 Budget Act requires Congress to pass a budget each year. Considering just this one instance, it ought to be fairly easy for the informed American of reasonable intellect to infer that there is something dreadfully amiss with a government that has not passed a budget in four years, yet has increased the national debt by trillions of dollars and allows its president to authorize billions in additional spending on an almost weekly basis … If this hypothetical informed American of reasonable intellect were to take advantage of the unbiased raw data available, he would quickly come to the conclusion that my charge of unprecedented fiscal irresponsibility is indeed accurate.” Of course, some of these ignorant Americans may also – unlike Rush – be aware that budgets are passed by Congress, not the executive branch. The rest of the accusations of ignorance are even more ignorant.

Gays, Marxism and totalitarianism
And then there is, of course, the gay agenda. Gay rights advocates have a“venomous hatred for everything smacking of Christianity,” and same-sex marriage is part of “the anti-theistic, Christophobic design of the radical left,” which Rush claims will bring about “societal dissolution” and put the U.S. on “the road to tyranny.” The causal mechanism is again a bit woolly, but as Rush learned from Glenn Beck it has something to do with Common Core, and probably Satan – at least by allowing gays (“freaks”) on stage during the 2014 Grammys, Norman Lear opened the doors to Satanism.

And, particularly insidiously, the people behind the gay agenda are deliberately pushing bigots to to get violent against them. It’s all a plot, and any hatred and violence against gays is all their fault.

Gun control, communism and totalitarianism
Among the measures Obama is taking to implement totalitarianism (and the End Times) is, of course, gun control. Rush claims that the left is to blame for urban crime (“It is the destructive social policies of the left that have precipitated the dysfunction that leads to violence in the black community … Societal dysfunction fostered by the left has led to increasing levels of violence, some of which is perpetrated with firearms”), and concludes that “radical Marxists” in the Obama administration hope to “foster” gun violence to justify their plan to “disarm Americans,” which will allow them to “manifest their decades-long dream of a Marxist America.” He also suspects that President Obama may be behind the recent murder of gun enthusiast Keith Ratliff as just “the first of many such executions that will take place in order to silence individuals whom the government deems a threat to their oligarchical collectivist agenda.” He admits, though, that he has “no proof” besides his own “inclination.” But hey – this is Erik Rush, and he hasn’t ever used any evidence besides his inclination ever in any case. Christians, on the other hand, will be classified as“mentally ill” and shipped off “to an asylum”. Liberals are also to blame for the Trayvon Martin murder – Martin was murdered because liberals turned him into a “thug-in-training” who “accosted” George Zimmerman.

Obama, China, tyranny and communism and totalitarianism and tyranny and Satan
What else can Obama be using? Currently Obama is purging the military leadership in order to make it easier for him to murder U.S. citizens as part of a communist autocoup (in that very column Rush also complains that no one is taking him seriously). As a good communist, Obama is of course also looking to China. Indeed, Obama is actually about to cancel the 2014 elections and hand the US over to China, starting with giving American land to the Chinese government in exchange for debt forgiveness (Rush hasn’t quite understood that debt part), as part of his push for “disarming the American populace” to please his Chinese overlords. Rush claims to have this information from “sources”, but it sounds suspiciously like the plot of the Albert Brooks book 2030. According to Rush there is also a “50% chance” that Obama will cancel the 2016 elections and become a dictator, which would, one assumes, come in addition to already having cancelled the 2014 elections and given the country over to China. He gives no indication of how he calculated the probabilities.

At some point Obama will even allow terrorist attacks to justify martial law (also here). Indeed, he may already have done so. Sandy Hook was an obvious case of a false flag operation, as was the 2013 Navy Yard attacks. Rush pointed out for instance how young women photographed crying at the scenes of the Aurora and Sandy Hook shootings and the Boston Marathon Bombing look similar, and therefore must be the same woman and an actress paid by President Obama. And Obama is to blame also for the former KKK leader who went on a shooting spree at two Jewish centers in Overland Park, Kansas, in 2013.

Oh, yes – then there is the Boston bombing, though in this case Rush chose instead to respond by calling for all Muslims to be killed (and no, he wasn’t joking or exaggerating – “they’re evil”. Indeed). Later on Rush complained that he was being criticized for bigotry merely for using the word “Muslim” – what else in what he said could have been the target of criticism? And the fact that no Muslim had declared his support for himshows that they are, indeed, as evil and anti-American as he claimed. It has also been important to Rush to emphasize that the Tsarnaev brothers, who are literallycaucasian (that is, from the Caucasus), aren’t really white, since anything else would complicate his assumption that only brown people commit terrorist acts.

Finally, Obama is using immigration as a tool for total domination. Thanks to liberals, “émigrés from Third World toilets” have been flooding America so that we currently “have far more human garbage in this country than we ever ought to have tolerated.” But there is an agenda behind this apparent chaos – according to Rush muslim immigrants will be “Obama’s cutthroat foot soldiers” and “incite the chaos that will necessitate martial law.”

Helpfully, Rush sums up pretty much his whole authorship in this column, where he hysterically and incoherently points out that Obama is murdering everyone, and claiming that he doesn’t need evidence to prove it. Obama killed his gay lovers and drowned a woman who may have “come by information on the night of the [Aurora] shooting that wound up being detrimental to her health.” He also killed journalist Michael Hastings, an identity theft criminal, his dog trainer, Ambassador Christopher Stevens and (rather obviously) Andrew Breitbart. He is furthermore “creating jihadi cells” across America to help him with the killings. Now, despite quite clearly asserting these things Rush insists that he is just asking questions – this is, after all, the age of FEMA camps, which Obama will for instance make use of to stow away Cliven Bundy when carries out his plot to seize control of the food supply, so you don't want to assert too much. He did explicitly assert, though, that Obama “murdered” everyone on the missing Malaysia airlines plane; he knows this based on information from an unnamed source who is rather obviously Jim Garrow.

Moreover, Rush has promoted Garrow’s idea that Obama is trying to nuke South Carolina and indeed the whole of the US as part of the UN Agenda 21, using the 2013 Iran agreement as a diversion because Americans were catching on to their plans. Therefore Obama should be executed. And people who criticize Rush should be thrown in jail while government officials hang “from D.C. like fruits”, and the end times are here and Jesus returns.

For absolute insanity, you can see Rush discuss Obama’s imminent civil war with Rick Wiles here. You can see Wiles and Rush play wingnut bingo here, and a breathtaking exchange with Jim Garrow here. There is also a fine Erik Rush resource here.

Diagnosis: A combination of Alex Jones and Ann Coulter without the attention span or intellectual powers of either, Rush has managed to establish himself as more or less the epitome of fundie hysterical anger and flailing campaigns against coherence and reason. His impact is probably rather limited, though – it is hard to imagine that people listen to him without first having been irrevocably lost to reason anyways.

#1099: Chris Rushton

$
0
0

Though creationism is supposed to stay out of public schools there are plenty of efforts out there to bring anti-science to kids. In Tampa, for instance, kids can attend a 13-week series called the Answers Academy Creation Study, targeted at homeschoolers, where they will hear insurance agent and homeschooling parent Chris Rushton give them proper religiously based denialist backing to (hopefully) withstand the onslaught of science-based and reality-based education they may encounter elsewhere. Rushton has absolutely no background in science, of course, but as he says: He’s read plenty of the material from Answers in Genesis, starting with Ken Ham’s book The Lie(the title is not intended to refer to its contents). From there, Rushton has acquired most of the necessary falsehoods and talking points to get his class going.

For instance, according to Rushton, there are two types of science: “There’s observational science; that’s the type of science that we can test with our senses: smell, sight, taste, touch. But there’s also what’s called historical science or origin science. That is taking evidences or facts and then interpreting the past. When you look at origin science or historical science, we have the same facts, the same evidence, whether we’re creationists or evolutionists. What’s different is how we interpret the facts. So, we look to see how observational science applies to the information we find in the book of Genesis. If you look at it with an open mind, you’ll see that observational science confirms what’s in the book of Genesis and that evolutionary ideas are not confirmed by observational science.” No, Rushton; historical sciences are observational. Theology isn’t. In the worlds of Ken Ham and Chris Rushton, however, “observational” means “evidence-based”, and evolution, history, astronomy and so on are therefore categorized as “no more evidence-based than the Bible”. Rushton’s contributions are assessed here.

Diagnosis: Not a big fish, but Rushton is one of many people doing their best to spread denialism and anti-science at a local level, and these people are exceedingly dangerous.

#1100: Carol Rutz

$
0
0

Carol Rutz has nobly taken it upon herself to give a voice to all the victims of government mind control experiments during the cold war, in particular the MKULTRA program. She does so on whale.to and in her book A Nation Betrayed, and it goes approximately as badly as you would suspect (there is a review of the book by someone equally crazy here). She also tells us that she has Dissociative Identity Disorder (multiple personality disorder), but assures us that she is not crazy – she created those multiple personalities as a defense against the ritual satanic sexual abuse she was exposed to from her family – and it was only during various regression therapy-like sessions that she "discovered" the "truths" about her past.

You can read what Rutz thinks she was exposed to from the government here (she has “amassed an incredible amount of material that I feel validates my personal experiences”). I am not sure I have all the details right, but at least she claims that she was first subjected to certain drugs to “enhance my talent”(according to herself Rutz was chosen because she displayed psychic abilities) before being moved to machines that “are amplifiers of Psi abilities” (all hospitals have these – it is required by law – but it is of course super secret). In more detail, “[t]here was some type of surgically inserted ‘interface’ device implanted in my ‘third eye’ area to allow connection to these machines.” Apparently the government applied their techniques to heighten and use ESP, remote viewing, and the energy of the mind, and use Rutz’s multiple personas as slaves with the ability to “psychically kill” (… enemies, presumably). Indeed.

Here is Rutz’s musings on the shadow government and their institutionalized ritual abuse of children, and here is her presentation at The Fourth Annual Ritual Abuse, Secretive Organizations and Mind Control Conference in 2001. That conference probably featured quite a few quite colorful personalities.

Diagnosis: There is little doubt that Rutz’s really wants to help. But good intentions won’t quite suffice without an at least approximate understanding of the mechanisms that will turn your good intentions into a positive result. At least Rutz is probably pretty harmless.

#1101: Bill Ryan

$
0
0

“Project Serpo” is the name given to an alleged top-secret exchange program between the US government and an alien (non-existent) planet called Serpo. Various details of the exchange program have been described in several UFO conspiracy stories, e.g. on the UFO discussion fora run by UFO conspiracy enthusiast Victor Martinez and, in particular, as detailed on serpo.org, which is is Bill Ryan’s website.

The story usually involves Roswell, and maintains that US government contacted the home planet of the alien craft to establish some sort of diplomatic relationship between the US and Serpo (Serpo is supposed to be located in Zeta Reticuli, the home of what other UFO conspiracy theorists believe to be the home of the Greys), including sending twelve military personnel to visit the planet (all of them later died from “after effects of high radiation levels from the two suns,” which is not consistent with the actual Zeta Reticuli but convenient for explaining away the absence of witnesses). Much of the information has apparently been contributed by a guy who claims to be USAF Sergeant Richard Doty, but then again Doty has been involved in quite a range of UFO conspiracies with little connection to each other. Another problem with the theory is of course that Serpo fails to exist, that we know quite a bit about Zeta Reticuli (incompatible with the conspiracy theories), that the accounts violate most laws of physics (and logic), and that there is a total absence of evidence to even begin to back up any of the claims. But such are UFO conspiracies.

Apparently many ufologists believe Project Serpo to be a hoax, but since we are dealing with people with a tenuous hold on reality, even these have a tendency to think of it as a hoax perpetrated by the American military and intelligence communities as a cover for real secret programs.

It should be mentioned that Bill Ryan, a chief proponent of publicizing the Project Serpo claims, stepped down from his role as webmaster for the Serpo material in 2007. He still thinks an extraterrestrial exchange program did occur (because he wants to – not because of evidence), but admits that the Serpo releases definitely contained disinformation. The current maintainers of the site are apparently very disappointed that Anonymous is not pursuing their story. This gullible story on the project by author Steve Hammons does not put Hammons’s other authorship in a very confidence-inspiring light.

Diagnosis: Retired, true, but still apparently pretty crazy.
Viewing all 2331 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>