Quantcast
Channel: Encyclopedia of American Loons
Viewing all 2358 articles
Browse latest View live

#1791: Tony Jelsma

$
0
0
Tony Jelsma is Professor of Biology at Dordt College, a Reformed Christian College that teaches creationism rather than evolution (the program is of course non-accredited). Jelsma himself is a hardcore creationist and signatory to the Discovery Institute’s petition A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism, but unlike most signatories, Jelsma has actually studied relevant topics. Of course, he didn’t understand the sciencepart of it: “as I pursued the biological sciences I was aware that my views would be challenged, but I knew that evolution was wrong, God’s Word is true and I had confidence that any new findings I had would simply confirm my view.” Yes, it’s not only motivated reasoning in the extreme – Jelsma is positively proud of his ability to withstand evidence, facts and learning. And though he admits that the 6-day creation story of the Bible shouldn’t be interpreted literally, he “cannot reconcile human evolution with the Scriptural account of the creation and fall of man,” so he discards the science, which you are of course free to do but shouldn’t if you at the same time profess to teach science at an educational institution.


Diagnosis: A nice illustration of the mechanisms that make anti-science lunacy thrive. At least Dordt College is evidently not a place to get an education.

#1792: Ellen Tart Jensen

$
0
0
Iridology is a form of sympathetic magic and one of the sillier brands of pseudoscientific, quasi-religious woo on offer, at least among those enjoying a modicum of popularity. According to iridologists examination of the iris can reveal the health of a patient (false), the premise being that the iris will change to reflect injuries and illnesses and (falsely) that investigating these changes can be used to diagnose the ailment through the time-honored technique of subjective validation. It is also one of the most easily refuted and thoroughly disproved types of altmed, and the fact that it nevertheless doesn’t go away is illuminating.

Though iridology has been around for a while, one of its most central proponents was Bernard Jensen, who in 1979 (together with some other iridologists) notably failed a scientific test in which they examined photographs of the eyes of 143 persons in an attempt to determine which ones had kidney impairments. Neither Jensen nor the other iridologists showed any statistically significant ability to detect which patients had kidney disease and which did not. Now, Jensen died a couple of years ago, but his daughter-in-law Ellen Tart Jensen has apparently decided to pick up the torch. Ellen Jensen consistently lists “Ph.D., D.Sc. C.C.I.I.” behind her name, but the only education we can actually find her specifying is studying “the science of Iridology for several years with the legendary natural healer, Dr. Bernard Jensen, at the Hidden Valley Health Ranch in California” (she also does “nutrition” and “natural healing”, which we suspect means healing by regression to the mean). It may be telling that she is presently “Director of the School of Iridology and Co-Chair of the Ph.D. Program for the University of Natural Medicine,” and has previously served as “instructor and Dean for the School of Iridology at Westbrook University”. That’s closer to spam than an education. (Westbrook makes an honorable entry on this list of “Schools Not Accredited by any Recognized Accrediting Agency”). Apparently, she is “the only person who has written permission from Dr. Bernard Jensen to place his seal on his iridology certificates.”


Diagnosis: Yeah, she’ll serve in Bernard’s stead. Pseudoscientist and crackpot whose efforts will, contrary to her claims, not help improve your health.

#1793: Sayer Ji

$
0
0
GreenMedInfo (GMI) is famous for being one of the crankiest anti-science websites on the Internet, rivaling NaturalNews for sheer quackery and conspiracy-theory-fuelled lunacy. The people behind it are firmly opposed to vaccines, GMOs and fluoride, but will uncritically promote any type of cancer woo they can find on the Internet. The Quack Miranda statement is probably the only accurate statement on the whole website.

GMI was founded in 2008, purportedly to “provide the world an open access, evidence-based resource supporting natural and integrative modalities,” which is a de facto contradiction. GMI promptly chose to go with natural and integrative and quickly ditched the evidence part. The site is, however, frighteningly popular.


Hat-tip: RtAVM

Sayer Ji, the site’s founder, rejects “modern” medicine, which he refers to as “cannibalism (more on that below), and has also declared that evidence-based medicine is “as reliable as a coin flip” – which, even if it were correct (it isn’t) would give way, way better prospects for recovery than the woo promoted on GMI. The coin-flip claim is presented in his article “‘Evidence-based medicine’: A coin’s flip of certainty,” which contains an impressively rich a collection of anti-science fallacies, strawmen and misunderstandings put into service for Ji’s preference for pre-scientific vitalism. Mostly, however, it’s concerned with the so-called “replication crisis”, which Ji takes to imply that “[t]he very life’s blood of ‘evidence-based’ medicine – peer-reviewed and published clinical research results – which legitimizes the entire infrastructure and superstructure upon which conventional medical knowledge and practice is erected, has been revealed as mostly and patently false,” which is false. But Ji runs with that conclusion precisely where you’d think he’d run: i) scientific evidence suggests for instance that vitamin C as a supplement has no general health benefits, ii) given the replication crisis scientific investigations cannot be trusted, so therefore iv) vitamin C supplements are like magic. Yes, it’s the fallacy fallacy on speed – altmed promoters seem to have a systematic problem with Ben Goldacre’s point that “flaws in aircraft design does not prove the existence of flying carpets”. Ultimately, though, Ji’s whole rant is nothing but an appeal to special pleading: Because his favorite woo doesn’t meet the standards of science, Ji wants different standards. You’ve seen that gambit before.
 
Hat-tip: The logic of science
He has also tried the “science-is-always-changing” gambit beloved by creationists, apparently oblivious to the fact that modifying one’s credences in the face of new evidence – i.e. having attitudes that are, you know, sensitive to evidence – is precisely what distinguishes science from dogma. Willful misunderstanding is also part of it in the case of Sayer Ji.

Anti-Vaccine conspiracies
One of his perhaps most breathtaking examples of dishonest distortion of facts is the publication “200 Evidence-Based Reasons NOT To Vaccinate”, which has been widely shared among cranks and which to anyone else is as fine an example of the Gish Gallop as any. Each of the 200 “reasons” is just the citation information of a single scientific study, and GMI obviously trusts that you won’t actually look them up – every one of them either:

- demonstrates that vaccines is not the cause of the problem they are alleged to cause
- says something completely different than GMI thinks it says (in fact GMI even changes the titles of studies to reflect what they believe the study should have been called if it established what GMI, throught wishful thinking, thinks it established (which it didn’t) – and that seems to be the rule rather than the exception).
- is entirely irrelevant to the alleged connection.
- is small, demonstrably weak, or from very, very dubious sources.

The document is dealt with in some detail here, and several of the studies cited are dealt with here.

Among Ji’s own contributions to anti-vaxx lunacy is “The Vaccination Agenda: An Implicit Transhumanism/Dehumanism”, which starts by arguing that because we co-evolved with pathogens, living with pathogens is “natural”. So is death. And the fact that the relevant pathogens coevolved with us by evolving abilities to break through our systems is not something Ji even considers. Then he worries about “vaccine overload”, but his worry is – get this – that vaccines are exposing us to way too many antigens. No, seriously. Also aluminum. And toxins, toxins, toxins, of course. 
He also tries to argue that humans have “strayed from their mammalian roots by creating and promoting infant formula over breast milk and then promoting synthetic immunity via vaccines over the natural immunity conferred through breastfeeding,” apparently oblivious to the fact that breastfeeding hardly protected much against smallpox, measles or child mortality in the past.

Oh, but he’s just getting started. For the grand climax, Ji will compare vaccination to transhumanism, which to him is a “movement which intends to improve upon and transcend our humanity, and has close affiliation with some aspects of eugenics.” How the …? At least “[t]he CDC’s immunization schedule reflects a callous lack of regard for the 3 billion years of evolution that brought us to our present, intact form, without elaborate technologies like vaccination –  and likely only because we never had them at our disposal to inflict potentially catastrophic harm to ourselves.” Or, by extension: all medicine is bad because it prevents the natural outcome your illness would otherwise have led to. Just think about it (and then ask what Ji must think the goal of the advice he gives on his site might be). In the end, vaccines apparently makes us less human and – the most novel point yet – apparently unfairly disadvantages the non-vaccinated, who will not be immune to the diseases in question. And he is serious. You can’t make this stuff up.

A similar style of reasoning can be found in “Biotech’s Dark Promise: Involuntary Cannibalism for All”, discussed here. According to the article, vaccines are a form of cannibalism (yeah, it’s the idiotic “aborted fetal tissue” gambit; and no, there are no fetal cells in vaccines); also, vaccines are unnatural (of course), and Ji is scared – and tries to scare you– with all the technical, artificial unnatural equipment and techniques used to develop vaccines: it’s all so science-based, technology-based and sterile – and … they fiddle with the genes of the bacteria! On the other hand, Ji is a fan of the Gerson therapy. How the Gerson therapy is more “natural” than vaccines is anyone’s guess, but at least it’s not evidence-based. Actually, it’s pretty clear why it’s more “natural”; “natural”, for Ji, is just a label marking his gut feeling approval – it doesn’t really mean anything.

In “HPV Vaccine Maker’s Study Proves Natural HPV Infection Beneficial, Not Deadly,” Ji and Kelly Brogan tries to argue that “natural” HPV infection is better at preventing cervical cancer than the vaccine. Think for a moment about how hysterically idiotic that claim is. Does it come as a surprise to learn that the study they refer to does not say that at all? Or that even if that one small study did say what they claim – which it emphatically doesn’t – it would be largely irrelevant in the grand scheme of evidence?

In “Study Calls Into Question Primary Justification for Vaccines” Ji reported a study he interpreted as saying that antibodies were often unnecessary to fighting off viruses; hence vaccines are bunk. The first author of the study did, to put it mildly, not agree with Ji’s interpretation of his results. The article was duly shared by Sherri Tenpenny, who promptly deleted comments quoting the first author’s response and banned those commenters. ‘cause that’s how she rolls.

At least his ramblings has gotten Ji invited as a keynote at the quackfest Autism One. Which is not something to be proud of.

Germ theory denialism
Reasonable people are often surprised to learn of the existence of germ theory denialism, but it is a major strain of altmed thought. Ji is a germ theory denialist. In “Measles and Mumps Are Good For You” (oh, yes) he promotes The Healing Power of Germs. After claiming that our fear of microorganisms is unfounded and stoked by the CDC through fears of antibiotic resistance, leading to the requirement for vaccines (which Ji has elsewhere established are superfluous and dangerous), he tries to argue that since lots of microorganisms are living in symbiosis with us and even necessary for us, they are natural, and therefore good. Disease, meanwhile, is apparently caused by imbalance of the humors (what Ji refers to as “toxins”, or lately “nano-particles”). “Germ theory has, in certain respects, taken on the characteristics of an infection itself. Not a physical one, but an ideological one, i.e. a meme,” claims Ji. And for the conspiracy: “health authorities like the CDC and the WHO[projects the view] that germs will be the end of us all,” which they … don’t, but according to Ji do in order to fool us into using “vaccines and drugs, or support global germ eradication campaigns”. Oh, but he also cites studies, which he completely misinterprets.

Zeh toxins and natural cures
GMI presents many natural products as equal to or superior to all “modern” medicines/chemicals. The list of silliness is long, but a few arbitrarily chosen examples

  • An article claiming that “a compound in ginger is 10000x more effective than Taxol” for breast cancer, which is silly, but apparently attractive to Ji since compounds in ginger are natural and scarily-named medicines are not. He does link to an Indian study, which does not make the claims Ji attributes to them at all (besides, didn’t he above just dismiss scientific studies as worthless in any case?). Nevertheless the article has been widely shared on social media, and there are stories indicating that people are currently dying because of it
  • An article called “GMO Insulin May Cause Type 1 Diabetes”, in which he tries to convince people not to take insulin. He also cites a study. That study does not even remotely say what Ji claims it says. You can probably figure out whether Ji’s efforts contribute to the health and well-being of his readers yourself.
  •  “Cabbage Beats Chemo for Cervical Cancer.” It doesn’t. Ji willfully misunderstood his sources.
  •  Gluten woo is a common ploy, but GMI takes it to a different level and has even claimed that eating wheat causes schizophrenia. It doesn’t.

Some more: Hat-tip RoAVM 
To understand where Ji is coming from, it’s worth pointing out that he is a genetics denialist, too. Like many other proponents of woo, a central principle for Ji’s approach to health is “you are in control; you can master your own health;” any idea that we are not in control is anathema (yes, it’s really The Secret all over). Accordingly, he denies that cancer, for instance, have a genetic component: “Choice, therefore, becomes central to determining disease risk,” says Ji; choice, and the mythical toxins – and cancer can be prevented, as always, with diet and natural lifestyle. And as usual, he misunderstands studies: “What we think we know about the BRCA (Breast Cancer Susceptibility Associated) genes causing cancer is patently false, according to a new meta-analysis on the extant literature on the subject of these gene variations on breast cancer survival prognosis.” The study he is referring to did of course not say that. And of course, Ji appeals to epigenetics, which he doesn’t understand but uses roughly the same way other crackpots use “quantum”, as a magical black-box operator that allows you to conclude anything from anything.

Here is Ji on mammography, which is evil; according to Ji studies show that the “breast cancer industry’s holy grail (that mammography is the primary weapon in the war against breast cancer) has been disproved,” and that mammography “appears to have CREATED 1.3 million cases of breast cancer in the U.S. population that were not there.” The study he refers to does not suggest that. At all. Once again Sayer Ji willfully misunderstands a study and concludes that science doesn’t work; therefore he is justified in promoting whatever crackpottery he wants.

GMO
GMI is vehemently anti-GMO, and as with every other topic, facts, accuracy and evidence don’t matter once Ji has decided what his conclusion is going to be. For instance in his article “New Study Links GMO Food To Leukemia”, he begins by summarizing the study in question (“Now, a new study published in the Journal of Hematology & Thromboembolic Diseases indicates that the biopesticides engineered into GM crops known as Bacillus Thuringensis (Bt) or Cry-toxins, may also contribute to blood abnormalities from anemia to hematological malignancies (blood cancers) such as leukemia”), proceeds to offer some scare-mongering about Bt toxins and exaggerates the most extreme conclusions of the study. Then he concludes that the study shows – as he already knew – that GMOs are evil and should be banned: “The reality is that we no longer have time to wait around for additional research to accumulate on the adverse health effects of GMOs, especially considering the biotech industry has far more capital to infuse into their own faux research on the topic […] In the meantime, you can join the growing movement to March Against Monsanto […] as a way of expressing your desire for real change, as well as vote with your forks, the only immediately effective tool we have against biological and environmental harms caused by the dominant GMO-based food system.” Of course, the study in question didn’t concern GMO toxins, but whole-bacteria toxins, which are used by organic farmers. Once again, it is a good example of the general format of GMI articles: Cite a genuine study (to sound intelligent), and then draw the conclusion you wanted to draw, regardless of whether the study is relevant to or even contradicts that conclusion.

(More) conspiracy theories
GMI is a tireless promoter of Big Pharma conspiracies, and a go-to place for the appeal to Monsanto gambit. And of course: “[d]id you know that natural treatments for cancer have been known about and suppressed for over 50 years? Watch the groundreaking Truth About Cancer documentary free by registering here [I don’t link].” The “suppressed cancer cure” conspiracy is probably one of the most ridiculous conspiracy theories on record. (For the record, Ji calls his conspiracy theories “conspiracy factualities”). The documentary in question is discussed here. Ji himself claims that chemo “enriches” cancer stem cells. Whatever that might mean, it’s idiotic.

Like so many other quacks, Ji has warned against contributing to ALSA because ALS isn’t that dangerous and you should spend your money buying supplements from charlatans instead (ALSA instead promotes science-based approaches). He has his own article, “60+ Natural ALS Cures the ‘Ice Washing’ Campaign Isn’t Funding!” (you remember the icebucket challenge, right?) The “60 ways” are covered in a “GreenMedInfo’s free ALS research PDF”, where he lists scientific papers he has cherry-picked and which – surprise – don’t say what Ji says they say. None of the papers actually contain the claim that ALS is curable, but then again: the scientists behind them don’t, as opposed to Ji, have products to sell you. Ji, of course, is fully aware that none of his subscribers will read or be able to understand the studies, so the pdf probably serves its purpose. You should weep.

Ji has also shown up on Gary Null’s show to complain about how a new, nefarious “science-based medicine” movement has become a grave threat to “alternative health.” Apparently he thinks that’s a bad thing. He and Null apparently also thinks that those who criticize them must be secretly funded by shadowy sources that they are unwilling to disclose.

Kelly Brogan
Yeah, we’ve dealt with her before, but Kelly Brogan is one of the main contributors to the site, which describes her as “boarded in Psychiatry/Psychosomatic Medicine/Reproductive Psychiatry and Integrative Holistic medicine, and practices Functional Medicine, a root-cause approach to illness as a manifestation of multiple-interrelated systems,” which means “deranged quack” in ordinary language. Brogan is a psychiatry denialist (“The science of psychiatry is [a] myth”), who has explicitly argued that it is important to not aid potential school shooters with sorely needed medication.


Diagnosis: One of the most influential infectious-disease advocates on the Internet, Ji is also one of the craziest. It’s comforting to imagine that most of those who visit his site are people fascinated by critical-thinking trainwrecks, but that’s probably not the case.

#1794: Abby Johnson

$
0
0
Abby Johnson is a pro-life activist working with Coalition for Life. She received some attention when joining the movement, since she had previously worked for Planned Parenthood. After her resignation – ostensibly after watching an abortion, but her conversion story doesn’t quite hold up even under cursory scrutiny; Focus on the Family nevertheless wants to turn her story into a movie – she started claiming that her bosses had pressured her to increase profits by performing more and more abortions at the clinic (an easily disproven lie) and that she “was a director at an abortion clinic where we sorted through piles of babies to harvest arms and legs for sale,” since being opposed to abortion for moral reasons is not enough: there also has to be a callous conspiracy going on. And who do you think is behind it all? Yes, that’s right: Planned Parenthood is working with the devil himself.

According to Johnson Planned Parenthood has abortion “quotas” and requires their staff to “coerce” women and minors into having abortion. In 2011 she also supported Live Action’s “potential sex traffic” hoax video attack on Planned Parenthood. Johnson, of course, fell for it hook and sinker because it would serve her agenda.


Diagnosis: As we’ve said before it is possible to have a serious debate about the morality of abortion. But lunatic conspiracy theorists like Abby Johnson are not part of that debate. Loud and crazy, but she has many fans.

#1795: Bill Johnson & the ADA

$
0
0
The American Decency Association (ADA) is, as the name suggests, an aggressive, fundamentalist organization working to prevent “indecent” media and indecency in general, which including Maxim, Cosmopolitan,lingerie, gays, lesbians, dance groups, abortion clinics, Magic Johnson (who should be ashamed of his gay son), swimsuits, and pornography, and seeks “... to educate its members and the general public on matters of decency; to initiate, promote, encourage and coordinate activity designed to safeguard and advance public morality consistent with biblical Christianity.” ADA was founded in 1999 by former elementary school teacher Bill Johnson, previously director of the Michigan branch of the American Family Association (AFA). According to Johnson “Pornography does destroy. How can anyone deny that? Yet, there are certainly those that do deny that.”

And of course, to ADA marriage equality is of the devil, leading to “chaos and dysfunction”, as well as “lawlessness”; ultimately, what Johnson calls gay “special rights” will even lead to “despotism” and the end of freedom. How it can simultaneously lead to both lawlessness and despotism is not explained, but in any case America deserves God’s wrath for daring to give gay people equal rights (gays are “disgusting”, according to Johnson). Prior to the SCOTUS 2015 ruling on marriage equality Johnson (like other fundie wingnuts) warned that if he didn’t like the ruling SCOTUS eventually arrived at, then “truth, righteousness, the free expression of belief, Christian conscience, will be removed from our schools, our government – even many churches that fear man more than God,” and America would consequently be punished by his strongman, God.

Like the AFA, the ADA call on its members to flood companies they target with complaints (they will even write the complaint for you) and boycott the products of those companies. For instance, they’ve been on Abercrombie & Fitch’s back for some 15 years, tried to get its members to boycott malls renting out space to Victoria’s Secret, since they “sell lingerie in an inappropriate and immoral manner”, and in 2006 gained some attention for their campaign against a calendar depicting Detroit Pistons’ dance group “Automotion” members in swimsuits, which they described as “legalized pornography” (accuracy isn’t a strong suit for groups like this). They also monitor various TV stations and their advertisers for decency, and has blacklisted TV shows like Desperate Housewives and Grey’s Anatomy – as well as the obvious target, Glee: ADA has tried to get advertisers to pull their support from Glee for years, warning that the show is “poisoning our youth” with its “destructive messages;” Glee is, according to Johnson, “a gruel of illicit sexuality, secular humanist ideology, and the promotion of homosexuality and deviant behavior.

In 2012 the ADA tried to target Google for their “Legalize Love” campaign, complaining that Google should “just make their product and stay out the culture war;” after all “what gives you, a technology company, the right to tell people what’s right and wrong?” That complaint applies to anyone who disagrees with them. (The answer “whatever gives the ADA the right to do so” doesn’t compute.)


Diagnosis: Rabid fundie hater. He’s got powerful friends, but we’re uncertain how much weight aggressive, delusional hate organizations like his can really push anymore.

#1796: Derek Johnson

$
0
0
Derek Johnson is a state judge in California who, in 2012, got publicly reprimanded by the California Commission on Judicial Performance for going total Akin: “In the commission’s view, the judge’s remarks reflected outdated, biased and insensitive views about sexual assault victims who do not ‘put up a fight.’ Such comments cannot help but diminish public confidence and trust in the impartiality of the judiciary,” said the commission. With regard to a particularly ugly rape case Johnson alleged that “I’m not a gynecologist, but I can tell you something: If someone doesn’t want to have sexual intercourse, the body shuts down. The body will not permit that to happen unless a lot of damage is inflicted, and we heard nothing about that in this case.” It doesn’t work that way.


Diagnosis: Completely unqualified for his job.

#1797: Jay Johnson

$
0
0
There is heavy competition for being the most repugnantly deranged lunatic on the Internet, but Sandy Hook truthers put in a good application. According to them, the Sandy Hook shooting was a hoax – arranged by the Obama administration or lizard people from space – cleverly designed to increase sympathy for gun control. Of course, a group unscroupolous and powerful enough to pull that off would likely not need to do so to implement gun control and would surely have been able to come up with a more effective means, but logic, reason and evidence don’t figure high on the list of guiding principles for inquiry among people like these. A brief article on the phenomenon is here.

An important resource for all things Sandy Hook conspiracy is the website SandyHookHoax.com. It was created by one Jay Johnson, whose (self-reported) credentials include being “the only person in the world to solve LOST.” He claims that he originally created the website to help the victims, but then realized that “it was 99% odds another psychological operation that was going on.” He also emphasizes that he created the website on “12/21/12.” This is significant, “since I am the New Age Messiah, with my Look Your Heart in the Mirror™ as the new revelation from the Goddess Tefnut, aka Ma’at, of Egypt.” So there’s that, too.


Diagnosis: Needs a hug and someone to love and care for him. Desperately. As such it is unfortunate that we need to recommend people to maintain a safe distance, but we probably should.

#1798: Jerry Johnson

$
0
0
Jerry Johnson is president of something called the Nicene Council, and a raging fundie. As fundies are wont to do, Johnson believes that the end is near, and is actively looking for signs to support that idea. (You can read his “10 signs of God’s judgment upon a nation here, but the web design itself should give you a clue about what you have in store if you decide to do so.) He is also a creationist, and has created some videos using common creationist PRATTs to argue against evolution, which he doesn’t understand at all.

Johnson may, however, be most famous for his anti-Mormon activism. In 2012 Johnson asserted that he would not vote for either Romney or Obama, complained that “the two major parties have given us the choice between voting for the Beast or the False Prophet,” and called the two candidates “twin evils.” He also posted a video explaining “why Mormonism is a cult”.

Diagnosis: Not easy to distinguish from a mass of similar-minded fundamentalists, but that doesn’t make him any less insane. Probably not very influential, though.


Note: I am assuming that he is a different person than president of the NRB Jerry A. Johnson.

#1799: Melvin L. Johnson

$
0
0
The title of “dumbest creationist argument ever” has seen some pretty spectacular competition. You may remember the banana argument and the peanut butter argument, and perhaps even “pygmies+dwarves”. A personal favorite is Richard Gunther’s argument against evolution based on the technological regress of civilizations since the stone age – though, really, any argument appealing to the second law of thermodynamics is at least as silly.

But the one used by Melvin L. Johnson, pastor of the Heart of Christ Community Church in Brazoria, TX, for his article in Christian Post (“the nation’s most comprehensive Christian news website”) called “My Personal Encounter with Evolutionary Theory,” is a good candidate, too. In said article, Johnson claims that the theory of evolution was developed as “a means to explain through a biological format why black people could and should be maintained as slaves.” You see, the full title of Darwin’s book is The Origin of Species By Means of Natural Selection or The Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life, and as Johnson points out “What does ‘Favored Races’ mean? The term race refers only to humans, and there have been no voices in any of the hearings that I am aware of who have pressed this point.” The reason would presumably be that the point is stupid and false. Of course, for that very reason the point has, in fact, been pushed plenty by a variety of creationists, from Henry Morris to Paula Weston and Sharon Hughes.

Johnson used the argument as a basis for complaining to school officials about the biology text used in his kid’s school. The complaint also pointed out that “the most primitive fossils were almost always referred to Africa and the most modern findings were European (Neanderthal),” which is further proof that evolution is racist (“By the way, Darwin held a very low of opinion of women, including white”). He also mentioned Piltdown Man and Nebraska Man, which at least suggests familiarity with creationist texts and demonstrates no understanding of evolution or science whatsoever.

But he is just getting started, of course. There is also Hitler, whom Johnson describes as “an evolutionist who praised Darwin” (which, of course, is blatantly false since Hitler rejected evolution, but Johnson is a fundamentalist Christian preacher so apparently the don't lie-rule doesn't), Mussolini and Emperor Hirohito (a first in creationist screeds, as far as we know), and the “communist empires of the Soviet Union, China and smaller but just as brutal leaders and governmental powers” (explicitly including Lenin, Stalin, Mao and Fidel Castro), which in reality rejected and even banned the theory of evolution but according to Johnson’s imagination were all “based in evolutionary doctrine, where men ruled as gods” (the divinity of man is not a central tenet in the theory of evolution). He throws in Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels and Friedrich Nietzsche, as well, since they preached about the death of God and evolution is atheistic and therefore evolution and atheism are the same as Marxism. There is more, but we are done.


Diagnosis: Not very concerned with truth or accuracy, is he? Not particularly influential, we think, but rather typical for the more idiotic strands of creationism so popular among certain segments of the American population.

#1800: Sonnie Johnson

$
0
0
Sonnie Johnson is a Breitbart News author and Tea Party Patriot, the kind of person who argues (well, insists) that Obama is a Marxist who may or may not believe in God, but definitely thinks that “God must be dethroned.” It would be interesting (not really) to see how she defines “Marxism”: “Karl Marx had two main goals: to destroy capitalism and to dethrone God,” says Johnson. Not … quite. But you see why Obama is committed to dethroning God, right? “So when you hear the leader of progressivism, aka American Marxism, say that you are doing ‘God’s work,’ understand he means it. He means you’re taking over God’s work. God must be dethroned.” That’s all the subtlety and nuance her fans would ever ask for.

Moreover, if Obama and his ilk are claiming to do God’s work, it’s pretty easy to see that they are lying: “why are the Ten Commandments not allowed in the social services building?” And “why is there even a question if Little Sisters of the Poor have to pay for abortion?” (which I don’t think was an issue that was ever on the table). And not the least: “do we have to ask him [i.e. God] where he stands on marriage?

Johnson is currently affiliated with Blacks for Donald Trump (“we want greatness; we do not want free sh*t”), and seems to still claim that the media “dramatically underestimate[s] Trump’s support among black voters,” cause that’s the evidence she receives when she goes on social media.

Oh, and she’s a creationist. According to Johnson, there are two stories about the creation of the world: evolution or God; and she chooses God, not science, which she – of course – equates with atheism.


Diagnosis: Yes, she has readers. But at least she helpfully illustrates how some of these nutters are approaching the world: everything she doesn’t like is one: atheism, social justice, liberalism, Marxism, blasphemy. Ultimately, she really doesn’t like distinctions, does she?

#1801: Tyler Johnson

$
0
0
The documentary
Apparently Timothy Johnson just passed away, but perhaps he was morally reprehensible more than crazy in any case. Perhaps that applies to Tyler Johnson as well? Tyler Johnson runs a ministry called the Dead Raising Team and claims to have brought 11 people back to life. He even claims to have persuaded the authorities in his state to issue him with an official photocard which lets him through police lines at car accident sites. He also plays a prominent role in the “documentary” Deadraisers, which follows enthusiasts as they trail round hospitals and mortuaries trying to bring people back to life with prayer. It is probably needless to say that they fail.

Nor is Johnson willing to produce much by way of, you know, what most people would consider evidencefor his claim. What he does offer in terms of evidence for raising people from the dead has thus far at least failed to convince many beyond a tight group of ragingly lunatic fans (the case of the heart surgeon who brought a heart attack patient back from the dead with prayer apparently also involved a defibrillator, for instance). But of course the target religious extremists don’t apply ungodly standards of evidence in any case.


Diagnosis: If Johnson believes what he says he believes, he’s among the craziest loons we’ve thus far covered. We’re in the end not entirely convinced, though. In any case, his influence is negligible, but that people can walk around life with delusions like this is rather disturbing.

#1802: Wayne Jonas

$
0
0
Wayne B. Jonas is a family physician and one of the most influential, powerful and dangerous promoters of quackery and woo in the US, partly because he undeniably has his credentials in order and often manages to play the role of an apparently serious researcher (despite publishing in pseudo-journals like The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine; e.g. the one discussed here). He is the current president and CEO of the Samueli Institute, one of the foremost proponents of integrating fake medicine into medicine, and which focuses on “research” into the efficacy of alternative medicine – or altmed apologetics – such as the effects of prayer on treating disease, use of homeopathy to fight bioterrorism, use of magnetic healing devices on orthopedic injuries and a lot of acupuncture pseudoscience. According to Jonas “there is a good case for looking at these things scientifically, because we don’t know a lot about them,” which is actually untrue since we do know lots about most of them (and Jonas has been involved in demonstrating that they probably don’t work, but seems to refuse to admit that this is actually the result), and for others there is a combination of limited resources and low prior plausibility that makes putting resources into conducting well-designed and expensive trials a waste (though Jonas seems willing to compromise on “well-designed” if that makes it more likely to get the results he wants, which it does). Indeed, in a letter to the Lancet Jonas argues that further studies of homeopathy is a good idea while admitting that “we agree that homoeopathy is highly implausible and that the evidence from placebo-controlled trials is not robust.” Look: you can’t have it both ways, Jonas: if the treatment is highly implausible and has no evidence to support it (but ample evidence that it does not work), then we don’t have good reason to throw further millions into researching it. The Samueli Institute received over $31 million in taxpayer funds from the Department of Defense and over $43 million in taxpayer dollars altogether between 2003 and 2013 to produce nothing but obfuscation.

Jonas is also professor of family medicine at Georgetown University, and from 1995 to 1998 director of the Office of Alternative Medicine (OAM, since renamed the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health).

Jonas has, in fact, long been a defender of homeopathy, which stands to reality and science roughly as young-earth creationism does. As director of OAM, Jonas said that “[j]ust as the discovery of infectious agents revolutionized our ability to care for many diseases at the turn of the century, the discovery of what happens when a homeopathic preparation is made and how it impacts the body might revolutionize our understanding of chemistry, biology and medicine,” which really is the hallmark of tooth-fairy science: Trying to nvestigate how something works without having established that it in fact works. Indeed, since homeopathy doesn’t work, Jonas attitude is best characterized as denialism(peppered with allusions to the Galileo gambit).

Jonas has himself written books on homeopathy (Healing With Homeopathy: The Complete Guide and Healing With Homeopathy: The Doctor’s Guide) in which he expresses certainty about its effectiveness but openness to the mechanism (he admits that it might be placebo, but in the mythical energy sense of not-really-placebo that altmed promoters sometimes invoke; besides, he doesn’t really believe its placebo). The pattern of nonexistent molecules “must be stored in some way in the diluted water/alcohol mixture,” wrote Jonas (i.e. water memory, and suggested that occult energies, imaginary “biophotons” or New Age quantum effects could be involved. He is, however, frustrated with the research being done into homeopathy, since it rather clearly suggests that it doesn’t work, and has accordingly suggested that validating homeopathy “may require special pleading a theory that incorporates subjective variables,” which in practice means the ability to influence the effects of a remedy by intentions, i.e. psychic powers. In fact, Jonas is also on the Scientific Advisory Committee of the Institute for Noetic Sciences, where he “envisions the development of protocols using gene-array procedures to examine possible genetic expression arising from CAM signals in distant healing;” Jonas thinks that “bodily parts [can] communicate over long distances almost instantaneously” by means of “nonlocal characteristics in the biological process, with widely separated parts interacting in ways that don't have obvious physical carriers.” He believes this because he needs it for getting other things he wants to believe to come out possibly true, not because there is a shred of evidence suggesting that it is, in fact, true.

Jonas is apparently a regular on government-agency organized panels and workshops on altmed regulations, such as the FTC workshop on homeopathy in 2015 (one wonders whether the FTC’s regulation updates in 2017 were to his likings), and numerous other panels and review boards, such as the Consortium of Academic Health Centers for Integrative Medicine’s joke of a scientific review board. It is no surprise, though, that Jonas has himself become the target of more unhinged snakeoil salesmen like Timothy Gorski.

Here is a report on a testimony Jonas gave to the Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, where he argued in favor of making government pay for offering quackery to veterans (Jonas has been among the most vocal proponents of pushing snake oil on military veterans). It is … telling (yes, it’s grand claims and some metaphors supported by some amazing examples of tooth-fairy science but no evidence for efficacy of the altmed treatments in question whatsoever). Meanwhile, Jonas continues to churn out meaningless papers completely failing to show the efficacy of homeopathy while loudly claiming otherwise.


Diagnosis: Ultimately, the distinction between being wrong and being a loon will be rather blurry, and Jonas might immediately appear to be intelligent, honest and serious but mistaken. But really: He’s been pushing the same sort of tooth-fairy science based on the same thoroughly falsified assumptions for decades, all the while refusing to revise those assumptions. That’s the hallmark of a pseudoscientist. Still, Jonas continues to be frighteningly influential.

#1803: Art Jones

$
0
0
Arthur Jones was a 2012 Republican primary candidate for Illinois’ 3rd Congressional District. He also has a story of organizing family-friendly, neo-Nazi events around Adolf Hitler’s birthday – and he is a committed Holocaust denialist: “As far as I’m concerned, the Holocaust is nothing more than an international extortion racket by the Jews,” Jones said. “It’s the blackest lie in history. Millions of dollars are being made by Jews telling this tale of woe and misfortune in books, movies, plays and TV.” His remark “the more survivors, the more lies that are told,” though, makes it sound like the problem, for Jones, is the survivors.

He ran again in 2016, but this time as an Independent – primarily on an anti-immigration platform, though he took a firm stance against marriage equality as well; apparently homosexuals (“the lying Pink Crusader Rabbits”) are in a conspiracy that “seek[s] to uproot, and overthrow all the moral teachings of the Christian religion on which all of our laws are based.” He was also pushing something he called the “Neighbourhood Amendment”, which apparently sought to let citizens who decided to keep their neighbourhoods clean, white and Christian would have the legal means to do so (apparently the government is involved in a conspiracy to ensure that neighbourhoods are diversified as a step in their pro-gay, anti-Christian agenda). Oh, and he was still pushing Holocaust denialism – “the Holocaust is pure Kosher bolongna [sic],” complete with random capitalization and underlinings – and various other anti-semitic conspiracies: apparently kosher food is a nefarious ploy by Rabbis to tax non-Jewish consumers and use the money to fund abortions, gay marriage and illegal immigrants.


Diagnosis: Unsavory fringe loon, but he is not alone in his delusions.

#1804: Steve G. Jones

$
0
0
Ellen Grace Jones is British, but so wonderfully ineptly insane that we can’t help mentioning her. The far less interesting Ernest Jones deserves an honorable mention for this one, though we cannot be bothered to give him a separate entry; creationist lunatic Stephen E. Jones, meanwhile, is not American either.

But Steve G. Jones is, and he is as far out there as they get – unless he knows exactly what he’s doing, which we aren’t completely going to rule out. Jones is a hypnotherapist who is behind numerous recordings and publications about hypnosis and self-awareness and – wait for it – the law of attraction, and it is hard to imagine grownups promoting the law of attraction (with any measurable success) without knowing precisely what they are doing. Jones’s background is in education, which is not a relevant field to what he is marketing but certainly relevant to promoting them effectively to appropriate audiences.

According to Jones the hypnotherapy process is a tool to inspire the subconscious self to create a positive result, which is … not how it works. He also points out to his audiences that “[t]he conscious mind tends to be skeptical and often second-guesses the suggestions,” which is, I guess, somewhat telling: To make the law of attraction work for you, you need to override any reasons or counterevidence you may be conscious of. Thinking, especially critical thinking, has a tendency to fool you into not blindly trusting Jones’s advice.

His most significant contribution is perhaps the book You Can Attract It, co-authoredwith Frank Mangano, whom we have encountered before, but the title of his book Total Money Magnetism: The Neuroscience of Success is possibly even more telling if you wondered what kind of person we’re dealing with here (no, Jones is not a neuroscientist by a long shot). Apparently (according to a “review” by one Johnny Latournee), the “device of Total Money Magnetism was created so that it gets rid of all the negative beliefs and thoughts from your mind and reprograms it right into a mind of wealth and success,” and it “handles the Law of self, Manifestation and Attraction-improvement.” Jones also sells you “weight loss hypnosis,” and hypnotic treatments targeted at virtually any lifestyle or health-related desire you can dream of. And a “zodiac hypnosis collection,” which combines hypnosis with astrology. And all his hypnosis is all “natural”. Wait … Jones even sells you “natural penis enlargement” … by self-hypnosis. Come on.

He has apparently made numerous TV appearances, and is a featured expert (that would be “expert”) on TruTV’s Door to the Dead.


Diagnosis: This is spam. Well, I guess it is possible that it is all an elaborate, cynical and unfunny joke. Still. Spam. 

#1805: Matt Jonker

$
0
0
Dinner for Thought is an anti-vaccine page run by Matt Jonker, who is as scientifically illiterate as they come and – consequently – a splendid demonstration of the Dunning-Kruger effect in action. “To some, I may seem like some sort of modern day renegade; some kind of rogue in a vast wilderness of pharmaceutical influence,” says Jonker – almost like Galileo. Like most antivaxxers, Jonker blames vaccines for probably non-existent “spikes in autism” (his observations are based partially on conspiracy rants like the one discussed here). No, seriously, there really is no such spike, and vaccines don’t cause autism.

[Don't know where this meme
originated]
Here is a discussion of Jonker’s article “Why Don’t You Vaccinate”, a listicle compiled as a result of Jonker “researching this topic in depth for quite a while now,” where “researching” means studying various conspiracy theory sites – when Jonker repeatedly appeals to how the current vaccine schedule isn’t science-based (it is), it isn’t because the schedule isn’t science based, but because Jonker hasn’t bothered to look and has no clue how to interpret the science. So, the list offers a number of common antivaxx tropes, starting with “Vaccine manufacturers are immune from any and all liability,” which is false but a common misunderstanding among those who don’t understand the role of the Vaccine Court (hence demonstrating, if needed, that Jonker is an utterly unreliable source of vaccine-related issues.) After describing the conspiracy suggested by this (false) observation, Jonker goes straight to the vaccines didn’t save us” gambit, inferring from the false claim that since “cases [of polio, measles, diphtheria, tetanus] were already declining before vaccine introduction, so it’s almost impossible to prove that the vaccines are what saved us from outbreaks” (it really isn’t that hard), to “I don’t believe that vaccines eliminated diseases.”They did. Jonker, of course (and if we interpret him charitably), conflates disease incidence with disease mortality (which generally did steadily decrease before the introduction of vaccines due to improvement in medical treatments in general), and even though that interpretation is charitable it still makes him come across as a complete moron.

Hat-tip: RtAVM
It really isn't that hard.


Then he claims that “[h]erd immunity does not exist,” which is approximately like claiming that atoms don’t exist and refusing to look at the evidence. Herd immunity exists. There is even quite a bit of mathematics to quantify it. Jonker has no idea what he is talking about, and probably has no idea that he has no idea.

Then there is the toxins gambit. “The ingredients in vaccines scare the crap out of me,” says Jonker, which says nothing about the ingredients but quite a bit about Jonker since it demonstrates that he is chemically and medically illiterate; he also appeals to the difference between injecting and digesting chemicals, which he doesn’t understand. “Have you noticed the epidemic of childhood cancer that is happening today?” asks Jonker, pointing to the vaccine ingredients: “No, they don’t know what’s causing it.” There is no epidemic of childhood cancer. Moreover, “[m]any vaccines contain foreign animal DNA,” continues Jonker, which his “common sense” tells him makes vaccines unsafe. It’s probably safe to say that Jonker has no idea what happens to “foreign DNA” that finds its way into the bloodstream.

Another of Jonker’s listicles is discussed here. At least he is aware that he is – and honest about being – an antivaccinationist and conspiracy theorist. He also rejects conventional medicine – “man-made medicine that will ‘help’ only to a certain degree” – in favor of holistic medicine: “Most of the things your holistic health provider recommends fix the problem fast, with no side effects, are cheaper, and have been proven for hundreds or even thousands of years.” Of course, actual scientific research consistently shows that this is not the case (“alternative” means unproven or proven not to work), but then again scientific research is part of the conspiracy. Jonker relies on his intuitions about what’s natural. At least it’s useful to have another illustration of how anti-vaxx attitudes tend to correlate with religious belief in quackery.


Diagnosis: Since ignorance is typically accompanied by ignorance of one’s own ignorance, arrogance is a typical side-effect: The combined efforts of scientists be damned when they come up against Jonker’s decidedly non-scientifically based intuitions about how things ought to work. Probably not deeply influential on his own, but antivaxx conspiracy theories and attitudes like Jonker’s are definitely a serious problem.


#1806: Jim Jordan

$
0
0
James Daniel “Jim” Jordan has been serving as the U.S. Representative for Ohio’s 4th congressional district since 2007, and is co-founder of the House Freedom Caucus. As is common for people who claim to be concerned about “freedom”, Jordan takes a dim view of the freedoms of those who don’t share his race, gender, sexual orientation or views on religion and politics, and is a close ally of hate organizations like the Family Research Council and people like Tony Perkins. In 2009, for instance, when DC decided to recognize gay marriage, Jordan and Dan Boren introduced a bill to stop it, arguing that “[t]he family is truly the foundational institution of our nation, and marriage is its cornerstone,” which one would think is an argument for recognizing gay marriage; I suppose families of gay people aren’t real families. In 2012 Jordan said that the campaign to defeat Obama is just like previous generations who defeated Slavery and the Nazis (which is, in fact, not the most delusional element of this insane rant).

He is also a conspiracy theorist (or at least enabler of conspiracy theories); in 2013 he and Jason Chaffetz held a hearing “to examine the procurement of ammunition by the Department of Homeland Security and Social Security Administration Office of Inspector General,” a rather striking example of the return and mainstreaming of John Birch-style craziness among wingnuts. According to this particular conspiracy theory, the government has been hoarding ammo to use against Christians and conservatives if they protest too loudly against the left’s attempts to revoke and undermine religious freedom and the second Amendment.


As so many of his ilk, Jordan is no friend of science. Back in his state senator days, for instance, Jordan became known for pushing Academic Freedom bills to promote the teaching of Intelligent Design and undermine the teaching of evolution in Ohio public schools.

Diagnosis: Bigot and conspiracy theorist. Evidently (and unsurprisingly) that’s no obstacle to being elected to Congress in Ohio’s fourth district, which reflects not particularly well on those constituents.

#1807: Joseph Jordan

$
0
0
We admit that we haven’t actually watched any of the “Ancient of Days: Biblical Perspectives on the Extraterrestrial Topic” DVD set, but according to the Aliensresistance website pushing it, the set is “recommend for pastors”: Joseph Jordan is behind the installment “Unholy Communion: The Spiritual Nature of Abduction Reports”. Jordan is otherwise the President and co-founder of the CE4 Research Group, an Alien Abduction investigation and research team based out of Cocoa, Florida; he has also been associated with MUFON for decades and has contributed to numerous books and radio programs, and “has spoken during six Roswell UFO Festivals in Roswell”. According to the Aliensresistance website, the CE4 group “first started with a hypothesis, collected the data and then attempted to share their findings,” so it’s all very scientific. The research “showed that some people professing to be Christians were indeed reporting that they had encountered this experience in their lives,” which, however, sort of suggests to us that there are some crucial auxiliary assumptions going into formulating their research hypothesis that they may have neglected to test.

Jordan thinks aliens are bad and need to be fought; luckily, he and his group are there to help us resist the invasion. What their research apparently established is that it is, indeed, possible for Christian abductees to resist the aliens and make the abductions stop “by calling on the name and authority of JESUS CHRIST. Not as a magic word but by their allegiance to and personal relationship with Him.” The results were even “repeatable”: “We also found that by sharing this with other experiencers we could help them also stop their experiences.” (Of course, secular researchers won’t tell you this, so there has to be a conspiracy.) And how do you get exposed to such experiences in the first place? Well, you ask for it, of course, for instance “by being involved in New Age or Occult activities.” The CE4 Research Group is very careful to distance themselves from the “lunatic fringe” by pointing out that they are “not on the lunatic fringe” several times on their website.

The other installments in the Ancient of Days series are:

 “Evidences for a Spiritual View of the UFO Phenomenon” with Guy Malonewhom we have covered before.
- “Alien Intrusion: UFOs and the Evolution Connection” with our old friend Gary Bates.
- “Why an Extraterrestrial God Appeals to Today’s Culture” with Michael Heiser; and
- “UFO Cults and Extraterrestrial-Based Religious Movements” with Bill Alnor.


Diagnosis: Perhaps he should ask himself why people continue to confuse him and his group with the lunatic fringe? Probably harmless, though.


#1808: Peter Joseph

$
0
0
Peter Joseph is the guy behind Zeitgeist, an amateurish (complete with cheap CGI and a terrible soundtrack) but inexplicably popular conspiracy film made for the Internet. It is, basically, a disjointed string of various paranoid delusions, ranging from Jesus mythicism (Joseph’s take is discussed here; apparently the Bible is mostly just a guide to astrology) to income tax denial and claiming that the Federal Reserve is an elaborate plot by international bankers to take over the world, and – of course – 9/11 conspiracy theories (controlled demolition variety; the various myths and unsourced claims made in the move are discussed here). It will all ultimately (soon) lead to a one-world government and everyone getting barcodes tattooed onto them and RFID tags implantations. The whole thing comes across as a filmatization of randomly selected articles from whale.to; it is reviewed here and here, and some of its claims are debunked here. The connecting thread, if there is one, is the idea of shadow bankers, a nebulous, nefarious group that runs pretty much everything from behind the scenes, apparently for the purpose of enslaving humanity and reaping huge profits through instigating wars and financial crises through not-entirely-coherently explained mechanisms. Pretty standard fare for conspiracy theorists, admittedly, but with somewhat better production values.

And, of course, since the movie has such an important agenda to promote, it is entirely appropriate to engage in rank dishonesty, as when the movie shows TV screen shots of network or cable news with voice-overs to suggest that what was said on the news was what the (unidentified) voice-overs tell us (not remotely). There is also e.g. a quote attributed to David Rockefeller, though conveniently without providing a source or date. Now, the zeitgeist website does include a Sources page, but its just a list of books with no page numbers or further information given. Perhaps they just “forgot”? Edward Winston did a thorough job of locating sources here, but unfortunately his research tended to undermine the claims made in the movie itself – most of the quotes attributed to various historical people are either badly quote-mined or simply made up (often by other conspiracy theorist on other conspiracy websites). Apparently Joseph responded to Winston’s criticisms by suggesting that Winston must be mentally ill for disagreeing with him, so there’s that.

Zeitgest: Addendum, the follow-up movie, is somewhat less concerned with conspiracy theories and more with economic woo. Based on the message of the movies, Joseph also later started the Zeitgeist movement, a grass-roots international internet network formed to further his ideas with pseudo-economic ideas derived from The Venus Project and Buckminster Fuller. His Gentle Machine Productions LLC has later produced the web series Culture in Decline and InterReflections, which don’t seem to have made the same splash.

Diagnosis: Standard conspiracy theorist with a Messiah complex – Joseph is pretty influential among the weak of critical thinking skills, however.


Hat-tip: Rationalwiki

#1809: Rhawn Joseph

$
0
0
Joseph and the Mars rock
Rhawn Joseph is a (real) neuropsychologist and (genuine) pseudoscientist most famous for his, uh, controversial views on the origin of life on Earth and the origin of the universe. He is associated with the fringe “journal” Journal of Cosmology (which is more of a vanity website for Joseph’s crackpottery; among their more, uh, celebrated publications is this one), and the author of Astrobiology: The Origins of Life and the Death of Darwinism, which asserts that “[c]ontrary to Darwinism ... the evidence now clearly indicates, that the evolution of life had been genetically predetermined and precoded ...” based on roughly the same kind of evidence your run-of-the-mill young-earth creationist would use. Joseph does not appear to have any qualifications in any areas relevant to evolution.

Joseph isn’t your standard creationist, however. Instead he is an advocate of an intelligent-design version of the panspermia idea: life did not originate on Earth but was planted here by “cosmic seeds” encased in space debris some billion years ago. The seeds contained the genetic instructions for the metamorphosis of all life, including human beings, which then arose through what he calls a “pre-determined evolutionary metamorphosis”. Like the crank he is, Joseph argues that mainstream  scientific ideas, such as abiogenesis and the Big Bang, are religious doctrines masquerading as science; Big Bang is just a modern version of the Biblical Genesis and is, also according to him, unsupported by evidence. Several of his papers (published in his own questionable journal) are coauthored with Rudolph Schild.

In 2012 Joseph gained some notoriety for filing a lawsuit against NASA since they, as he saw it, failed to investigate whether a rock seen on Mars is in fact an alien lifeform. The background was a martian rock that suddenly appeared on a picture from Mars but had not been there the day before – because it had been dislodged and moved by the Opportunity rover. Joseph immediately published an article in his journal (yeah, its peer review process seems to be rather flimsy) in which he concluded that the rock was a living organism resembling Apothecia, a large fungus (it really doesn’t). 10 days later he filed a writ of mandamus in San Francisco Federal Court, demanding that NASA examine the rock more closely. NASA, of course, had already examined the rock and confirmed it was a rock with a high sulphur, manganese, and magnesium content (they also had pictures of the rock from before it was dislodged).

Here’s a discussion of another of his articles, also published in his own journal. Here is an example of the journal’s professional response to critics.


Diagnosis: Serious crackpot with a vanity journal. Sometimes he manages to get uninformed journalists to pick up one of his ideas, and he has, as far as we can tell, some followers. Still, he’s probably mostly harmless.

#1810: Keith Judd

$
0
0
A.k.a. Dark Priest
A.k.a. Mtr. President

Keith Russell Judd is one of several perennial candidates for political office (including Mayor of Albuquerque and Governor of New Mexico), and claims to have run for president in every election since 1996 (he has tried to run at least three times in Democratic primaries, at least). In addition to “Judd”, Judd has run under the nicknames “Dark Priest” and “Mtr. President”. A professed Rasta-Christian, Judd also claims to be a former member of the Federation of Super Heroes. Yeah, it sounds like a joke, but we’re not entirely convinced – hence the entry.

Among his qualifications is being convicted of two counts of “mailing a threatening communication with intent to extort money or something of value” after sending postcards stating “Send the money back now, Keith Judd, Last Chance or Dead” in a package also containing an assortment of strange items (the conviction is unconnected to a civil rights complaint he filed against the University of New Mexico, though Judd apparently claims otherwise). The letter was apparently targeted at a Texas woman whom Judd apparently believed to be a clone of singer Stevie Nicks of Fleetwood Mac: Apparently Nicks had paid to have that woman made so she could come down between concert dates and run her home improvement company. He also sent letters to jurors after his trial, which is not generally considered to be proper etiquette.

His most successful campaign was in West Virginia in 2012, where Judd – while in prison – won 41% of the primary vote against incumbent Barack Obama, which does not reflect particularly well on certain groups of people from West Virginia (Judd is not black). Judd later claimed that the election was rigged, which is a hallmark of crank candidates. Indeed, Judd even teamed up with Orly Taitz, no less, and filed a lawsuit seeking an order to prevent the electoral college from certifying President Obama as the winner of the election, have him declared a Kenyan and thrown out of the White House.


Diagnosis: We’re usually a little wary of covering people like Judd, but he’s sort of managed to make a public profile for himself. We want to say that he is probably harmless, though the behavior of certain substantial groups of people in West Virginia might suggest otherwise.
Viewing all 2358 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>