Quantcast
Channel: Encyclopedia of American Loons
Viewing all 2331 articles
Browse latest View live

#1141: Walid Shoebat

$
0
0

We can’t be bothered to cover Priscilla Shirer. Shirer is a Biblical motivational speaker who has authored mountains of tripe, but looking through it for a single, concrete claim in the nebulous, wooey clouds of fluffy gibberish is simply too daunting a task. She’s disqualified on technical grounds. And Andrew Shirvell needs a hug more than an entry in our Encyclopedia.

At least they pale in comparison with the amazing Walid Shoebat. Shoebat is a central actor in what seems to be a burgeoning industry of fake and questionable “former terrorists” who are selling their alleged expertise to the FBI, local police departments and – first and foremostly – lunatic wingnut talkshow hosts and columnists (Kamal Saleem is another). Shoebat is a self-proclaimed “Former Muslim Brotherhood Member Now Peace Activist,” ex-terrorist and terrorism expert, with an emphasis on “self-proclaimed” – those investigating his background has found anything resembling evidence for any terrorist or even particularly radical Muslim background, and quite a bit of evidence to the contrary (there are, for instance, no record of the terrorist attack in which he claims to have participated, and his story contains some impressively blatant contradictions) – and even if correct his background would hardly make him an expert on terrorism, something he has had ample opportunity to demonstrate. Nevertheless Shoebat, as a fundamentalist Christian, currently makes his living as an expensive lecturer and co-author of silly, paranoia-pandering books like The Case FOR Islamophobia: Jihad by the Word; America's Final Warning, and has become a pretty familiar face on fake news outlets such as Fox News. (Investigations into his finances and accountability have also led to some curious results, but that’s a different story).

And in his lectures and media appearance he gives you precisely the kinds of idiocy you’d expect someone willing to pay 5000 bucks to listen to a guy like this would want to hear. Apparently based on his background, Shoebat is in a good position to point out that Obama is a Muslim – “no one is called Hussein unless he is Muslim. So it is very clear that Barack Hussein Obama is definitely a Muslim,” says Shoebat, evidently unaware of how names work. And Obama’s pro-Islaimist worldview is motivated by Satan. “This is a demonic influence and the more America becomes liberal, the more that kind of influence prevails in America,” according to Shoebat (also here), who warns that liberals will dispose of the First Amendment in order to ban criticism of Islam and “the homosexual agenda” because … right. He managed to top most of the usual suspects on the Huma Abedin “case” – not only is Abedin a terrorist agent, “[i]t is extremely rare to have Muslim women marry non-Muslims, much less to have conservative Muslims look the other way, unless Huma has a ‘higher calling’ and a unique exception was made for her, since she is an ear into top U.S. sensitive information, or Anthony Weiner has converted to Islam or even both.” Yes, that’s how the mind of Walid Shoebat works.

Though most of his ranting concerns the evils of Islam, Shoebat does not shy away from criticizing other religions (or fail to see that they are different from Islam). So Shoebat has, for instance, accused Glenn Beck and David Barton (!) of attempting to bring about “Islamo-Mormon deistic universalism” because Islam and Mormonism are, well, the same (never mind that Barton’s vision of government would make Oliver Cromwell’s look like a pagan orgy) – according to Shoebat, Beck is a practitioner of “Chrislam”. And don’t get him started on Buddhism: “The reality is that Buddhism is just as violent, just as tyrannical, just as dangerous, and just as demonic, as Islam. Anyone who thinks otherwise is dictated by the now and the present, and not by prudence. The reason why Buddhists have, for a long time now, given an aura of peace, is because Buddhism is not in a position of power from which to commence violence and war. Buddhism has the concept of the use of false peace to deceive one's enemy, just as in Islam there is the use of false peace, or hudna (temporary truce), in order to trick the opponent to buy time and regain strength.

In his role as Bible scholar (which also produced this, which we are not even going to try to make sense of; this is rather confusing as well), Shoebat has also determined that Allah is the antichrist of the book of Revelation, claiming that “the evidence is overwhelming”. It tells you a bit about Shoebat’s standards of evidence. At least it means – to Shoebat – that the war on terror (to him the just war against Islam) really is “God’s war on terror”. And yes, the terrorists are apparently all Muslims; for instance, when Shoebat noticed that one of the victims of the Boston marathon bombings was a Saudi guy he immediately concluded that he must be among the conspirators (after said victim had been cleared immediately by the FBI, of course) and berated Michelle Obama for visiting him during her visits to the bomb victims. But then, Muslim attempts to take over the US are, apparently, everywhere and include for instance Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayip Erodogan; proof? In 2013 a Turkish-American Cultural Center was being built in Maryland. What more do you need (especially given Shoebat’s aforementioned standards of evidence)?

His son Theodore Shoebat seems to be following in his father’s footsteps, and we’ll return to him in a future entry.

Diagnosis: Well, at least he has the mindset of a raging Taliban fundie, we’ll grant that much. He seems to have a softer spine, however.

#1142: George Shollenberger

$
0
0
Yes, there are pictures of
Shollenberger himself
available on the Internet,
but we thought we should
give him a pass.

I am a little unsure about whether we should really include George Shollenberger. There are extenuating circumstances. Then again, he does not seem to be a nice guy. And he has (self-)published a book purporting to provide the first scientific proof of God, and it seems to be occasionally available on Amazon. It contains barely coherent, completely amazinggibberish. To take a nice example: “Today, both mathematicians and scientists are saying that the universe has an end. This statement is made without any proof. My research shows that this saying is false. The danger of making such statements in any nation is great. For instance, the Muslim’s say that a suicide bomber will be rewarded by God. This saying is false and causes errors in human behavior in the Muslim nations. Saying that the universe has an end causes errors in human behavior in all nations.” And thus the stage is set.

Of course, Shollenberger himself noted the absence of reviews of his incoherent ramblings in any serious venues, and concluded from this that what he claimed was right. There is a review here, however (though Shollenberger claims it is just a character assassination and a concentrated effort to stop the propagation of his book). He was not happy with that one, and complained to the “scienceblogs website” (no idea), complaining that “[Scienceblog’s] mathematicians are practicing atheism […] In the USA, the practice of atheism is […] illegal”.

And then there is his attempt to disprove the theory of relativity.

Diagnosis: Perhaps we should have given him a pass. But then again, if you enjoy incoherent ramblings Shollenberger provides bang for your buck like no one else.

#1143: M. Night Shyamalan

$
0
0

M. Night doesn’t need much introduction. In fact, it is probably pretty obvious how he qualified himself for an entry in our Encyclopedia as well. He might have successfully hid his delusions of grandeur, SPAGs and general ignorance for some time, but at least with the release of the movie “The Happening” in 2008 even his most ardent fans were sort of forced to admit not only that the movie is shit but that it is shit becauseShyamalan is a loon.

The movie in question centers around a high-school biology teacher caught in an epidemy of mass suicides. The movie explains these mysterious suicides as being driven by the “spontaneous evolution” of a “toxin” in plants, and the protagonist, in a poignant turning point of the movie, gets to dismiss those so-called scientists’ ability to explain anything, since it (evolution) is all “just a theory”: “Science will come up with a reason to put in the books but in the end it’s just a theory. We fail to acknowledge forces at work beyond our understanding.” Therefore God, or at least some fluffy New Age variant of God (big-N Nature, perhaps). The grand finale of the movie consists of a monologue about the limits of rational thought delivered by a supposed scientist (and you can see Shyamalan himself try to invoke the placebo effect as proof that nature is beyond rational thought here. It’s pretty feeble.)

Of course, a film maker does whatever he wants, but given the circumstances it is hard to avoid interpreting the movie as reflecting some apparent insight Shyamalan is bent on sharing with his viewers, and that insight is absolutely moronic. The movie itself is pretty much an anti-science screed based on Shyamalan’s failure to grasp science, reason and rational thought, as well his endorsement of Intelligent Design Creationism. There is a comparison between the movie and “Expelled” here, and a discussion of what the movie reveals about Shyamalan’s attitude toward and understanding of science here.

In an interview Shyamalan also claimed to have been motivated by Einstein’s alleged religious conversion fueled by the unknowable universe, which is a myth. The movie is also thoroughly sexist. His previous flick, “Signs”, is arguably little better.

Diagnosis: Choprawoo combined with Intelligent Design is not a great combo, and after “Unbreakable” (at least) Shyamalan has been unable to keep his crazy delusions out of his movies.

Honorable mention to Ridley Scott as well for the abysmally moronic “Prometheus”.

#1144: Bart Sibrel

$
0
0

Bart Sibrel is a victim. At one point he was punched in the face by Buzz Aldrin. That happened after Sibrel harassed confronted Aldrin with his views on the moon landing. Sibrel, of course, thinks those moon landings never happened (it hasn’t gone unnoticed in Sibrel’s circles that Aldrin was a freemason either), and has devoted his career to showing that this is so by judiciously selective use of evidence, using James O’Keefe tactics to make astronomers look bad, quote-mining, motivated reasoning and in general engaging in various elaborate, tortured conspiracy theories.

He has produced two “documentaries” on the topic, A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon (2001) and Astronauts Gone Wild(2004), and there is a pretty comprehensive review of Sibrel’s “evidence” in eight parts here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here. And yes, it is pretty much obvious to anyone with even the most cursory knowledge of the technology and documentation that Sibrel’s understanding of the things he talks about or cites as evidence is, shall we say, cursory. Oh, and the footage used in A Funny Thing that Sibrel claims was accidentally sent to him from NASA (and interpreted to be evidence that the Apollo 11 astronauts were staging shots of the Earth to make it appear that the spacecraft was on its way to the moon) is in factwidely available and shows the astronauts practicing for an upcoming live telecast. Details, details.

Diagnosis: Vocal, aggressive, and deeply delusional. 

#1145: Shawn Sieracki

$
0
0

Lee Siegel is a critical-thinking-challenged moron; we have noticed, but we don’t particularly feel like giving him much more attention than necessary. Instead, we will have a look at a more obviously serious issue associated with altmed practices, namely germ theory denialism. Yes, there are people out there who do not believe that germs cause disease. Indeed, quite a number of moderately popular altmed therapies rely on this idea – after all, it is hard to argue that bells and pyramids and crystals can chase bacteria; much easier to argue that they “restore” your mystical energies and balance the humors (and as these claims are formulated they are generally not even really testable); therefore, diseases cannot be caused by bacteria but must be caused by something else. Germ theory denialism is the conclusion of the very first chapter of John L. Fielder’s Handbook of Nature Cure Volume One: Nature Cure vs. Medical Science, and if you are pining for some intellectual suffering, you can have a look at the Homeopathy World Community’s  “Louis Pasteur’s germ Theory – Wrong”, or stuff written by borderline coherent crazies such as Nancy Appleton and Judie C. Snelson (“Why the Anthrax Bacteria is No More Dangerous to You Than Any Other Germ”). We have already discussed the efforts of Tim O’Shea.

At least according to youtube's search engines, a major source of germ theory denialist delusions is Shawn Sieracki. Sieracki is affiliated with the Whole Body Healing Center of Lewisville, whose website includes such items as the “detox challenge” (“Detoxify or die!”) and which offers services such as the legendary “detox foot bath”. For instance, in his video “Naturopathic Minute: Germ Theory” he lays it out pretty clearly: “germ theory is not correct”. The claim is discussed here, and it becomes pretty clear pretty early on that Sieracki actually has serious problems even understanding what the claim that germs cause disease even means. Instead, Sieracki tries to argue that whereas “germs are present in disease not as causes, but as superficial helpers brought there by Nature to rid the body of disease.” One wonders if he is willing to test the idea out on himself.

Then again, Sieracki is a homeopath, and his center “specialize[s] in homeopathic remedies, herbal and nutritional supplements, and wellness programs.” Heck, he and his partner Gary Tunsky even have a Quantum QXCI/SCIO machine, one of William Nelson’s inventions, about which Sieracki’s says: “The body scan is a device that scans the body energetically [how cool]. By that I mean it is reading the body’s meridian system that was developed many years ago by Chinese acupuncturist. Acupuncture is the most accurate medical science in the world. It has been around for over 5000 years. The quantum is taking today’s technology and combining it with the science of acupuncture.” But I don’t think that’s how quantum mechanics really works. Nonetheless, it is interesting to see how he attempts to hook unsuspecting readers: “As the SCIO has been devised using the principles of Quantum Physics, that question is easier asked than answered. Basically, during treatment, the SCIO measures the body’s resonance/reactance pattern and determines what benefit has occurred in the time period since the last measurement (less than a second earlier). If there has not been an improvement, the input resonance is altered. It maintains each beneficial setting as long as it is helping and changes it as soon as it is no longer useful.” That, readers, is amazinggibberish, and it is hard to imagine that Sieracki isn’t aware of that.

The machine looks suspiciously like something scientologists use, but according to Sieracki it can diagnose a range of illnesses and ailments in a matter of minutes. In other words, Sieracki takes his praise for the machine’s effectiveness where even scientologists don’t dare.

Diagnosis: We want to give them the benefit of doubt, but it is really, really hard to conclude that Sieracki is just delusional. 

#1146: Bob Silverstein

$
0
0

A.k.a. Ahmen Heaven
A.k.a. Goodman Livingwell

His aliases (invented by himself) are dead giveaways (unless he's an elaborate poe), and Bob Silverstein delivers crazy in abundance. Here, for instance, he advises you to “stop eating” (yes, Silverstein is an advocate of inedia) “...because fasting and elimination are more important – and more worthy …than eating!” It is backed up by some unrelated Bible verses and celebrity quotes, and Silverstein’s own testimonial (“I keep telling my family and friends how good it feels to have an empty stomach […] There’s even a feeling of renewed strength and energy, which is an empirical observation that most people experience after a good bowel movement.” Which is, you know, rather irrelevant. Indeed, he advocates breatharianism, and apparently views Wiley Brooks as a great prophet. Those who have ever visited his website should have some idea of what levels of crazy this implies.

On the other hand, Silverstein also advocates the “Jesus’s diet! For your sins”, so who knows. His section “Urine – The Fountain of Youth! needs little comment (Silverstein calls himself “naturopathic urine therapist), and he is not the only one of those out there). Here is a list of bumper stickers he’d “like to see”.

Diagnosis: This might, come to think of it, be a big joke. Either that, of Silverstein vies for the “craziest guy on the Internet” title, and is thus up for some seriously tough competition.

#1147: George R. Simpson

$
0
0

According to his very own profile George R. Simpson is a former NASA scientist, writer, inventor and software developer. Over the last 20 years, however, he has worked on identifying “a hidden language imbedded (sic) in the English language.” To do so, he has developed a fairly complicated set of rules (basically pure numerology) that allows him to “translate” the hidden language into common words and thereby revealing hidden messages (e.g. here). Quite what purpose a hidden language should serve is anyone’s guess, but Simpson is pretty ardent about it and takes a dim view of those who criticize his work (a website devoted to tracking his various lawsuits is here; yes, he did sue Randi at one point, claiming that he qualified for the million dollar challenge price). Oh, the codes are from a group of aliens that Simpson calls the ET Corn Gods.

The translations don’t seem to reveal much about the world either (unless you’re in the more challenged segment of conspiracy theorists), but they do reveal a few things about Simpson. Indeed, many of the messages he finds appear to be about himself – “Jesus”, for instance, translates to “GRS”, which would be … his own initials. Coincidence? Well, probably not, since if you actually look at the rules you will notice that they allow you to insert and delete characters pretty much at will.

Diagnosis: Colorful fellow. We should all be happy that people like this exists, though the various lawsuits he has been engaged in may have cost some taxpayer money. Might be worth it.

#1148: Fred Skiff

$
0
0

Fred Skiff is a professor physics at the University of Iowa, so he is a real scientist. He is also a creationist and signatory to the Discovery Institute’s A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism. Of course, his area of expertise is not even remotely related to questions about evolution. He stills feelscompetent to reject scientific work outside of his area of expertise when it doesn’t line up with what he thinks it should line up with. Which, of course, is what makes him a crackpot.

His lack of expertise is brutally displayed in his inability to draw even basic distinctions. For instance, here he equates evolution with materialism and atheism, trying to make it into a question of philosophical outlook – completely unperturbed by the fact that evolution is, you know, backed up by evidence. But that’s pretty much his complete line (apart from conflating evolution with abiogenesis and dismissing “macroevolution” as “overly reductionist”). The idea that scientific theories might turn on questions of evidence does not seem to occur to him, making one wonder about the quality of his own research. Oh, and there is also a conspiracy. You see, biologist just wants to make dissent illegal and throw dissenters in jail.

Diagnosis: Major crackpot, who completely fails to understand even the basics of scientific methodology. It is sort of uncanny that one may be able to get a position like his in academia without apparently having the faintest clue about this, something that Skiff has shown again and again that he hasn’t.

Crash course in basic epistemic distinctions for Fred Skiff:

Skiff is fond of the Worldview gambit, the idea creationists and biologists come to different conclusions because they start with different basic assumptions (e.g. spirituality v. materialism). First question: Are these basic assumptions completely arbitrarily chosen? If they were, then any background assumption would work equally well, and any worldview be equally good. But that, of course, is obviously false. Worldviews entailing that eating lead is good or the Earth is flat don’twork equally well. So the choice of worldview cannot be completely arbitrary. And if it is not completely arbitrary what worldview you choose, that must mean that there is some way of evaluating worldviews and judging some to be better than others, right? And that simple observation, that there is some way of doing so, is really the pitiful end of the worldview gambit. Now we just have to figure out what those criteria are. And there are some good ones available: empirical testing of the predictions, and explanatory power, for instance (the problem with Goddidit arguments is not that they are false but that they don’t explainanything even if they were true; what we need from an explanations are the whys and hows and wheres and whens, and any explanatorily worthwhile answer will tell us why something is the case rather than something else; in short, it yields predictions, and those predictions can at least in principle be tested in one way or another). Observations thus far have made a pretty good case for evolution and, indeed, for methodological naturalism. And if Skiff is worried about naturalism, all he has to do is to figure out a prediction that non-naturalism makes and that naturalism does not, and then test them against this prediction. Skiff hasn’t done that. At present his complaints are all arguments from feeling uncomfortable with evolution. It has nothing to do with “basic assumptions” or worldviews, but everything to do with denial.

Of course, Skiff might also try to deny that the difference in worldviews is anything that can be settled in terms of observable differences. But in that case, what on Earth is his objection to evolution supposed to be? Descartes’s dream argument? Or its close cousin, the omphalos hypothesis?

#1149: J.P. Skipper

$
0
0

Mars Anomaly Research was the name of an internet cesspool of hysterical crankery that retained some popularity for a while before apparently dying away some time ago. Its main purpose was to show (well, assume) that NASA and ESA have been doctoring space image data from the get-go in order to cover up the truth that Mars and other bodies in the solar system are actually much more similar to the Earth than we are being told and contain several life forms and, indeed, advanced civilizations. Why NASA and ESA would do that is anyone’s guess, but conspiracy theorists would probably have no problem coming up with a feeble and incoherent explanation and zealously defend its accuracy in the face of any counter-evidence or reductio.

In any case, the site was maintained by one J. P. Skipper. His “evidence” consisted primarily of strange-shaped shadows that, with the right photoshopping, would look quite a bit like facilitated pareidolia farms, buildings, giant trees, or deliberate airbrushing of notable features by evil scientists. As for the conspiracy, Skipper seems mainly to have believed that authorities actually believed that these other worlds were lifeless and only doctored the images passed to the public to make sure no one started questioning their cherished theories.

Most of the “evidence” was ridiculously poor examples of, well, pareidolia. Some “images” of various planets were not photos of planets at all, but digital models that Skipper would mistake for photos (e.g. here). In general Skipper and his fans displayed a pretty poor understanding of how scientific instruments taking photos of things millions of miles away actually work. See here for an example of “forest life on Mars”.

When the NASA LCROSS spacecraft impacted a crater near the Moon’s south pole in search of possible deposits of water ice in 2009, Skipper was unhappy, predicting armed retaliation from lunar civilizations. It hasn’t happened yet, but maybe we all need to keep our minds and eyes open?

Diagnosis: While “bullshit” is probably a more apt characterization than “deliberate misleadings”, the website at least contained quite an impressive amount of it. Though the site has been down for a while (leading to all sorts of conspiracies over at Above Top Secret,Skipper might be back with more of it before you know.

#1150: Joel Skousen

$
0
0

Joel Skousen is a nephew the epistemic trainwreck W. Cleon Skousen. W. Cleon, as you may remember, was a professor at Brigham Young University and a neo-Confederate, unapologetic racist and Mormon young earth creationist (a series of books) whose (absolutely incoherently insane) book The Five Thousand Year Leap became a recent bestseller after being heavily promoted by Skousen’s intellectual heir Glenn Beck – it is, by 2014, still used in at least one publicly-funded charter school, Heritage Academy in Mesa, Arizona. Among his other books The Naked Communistand The Naked Capitalist were popular in John Birch Society groups and portrayed communism as a conspiracy among wealthy capitalist families such as the Rockefellers to assume control over the world. It all gives you an idea of the intellectual climate that bred his nephew Joel.

Joel Skousen has made a career among survivalist idiots. He currently runs a couple survivalist retreats, and has written instructions on building fall-out shelters as well as several books. “You never want to make a house look like an obvious fortress,” says Skousen: “Those who want in can always move up a bigger gun. There is no way you can design a home to withstand RPG rockets and tanks. I design these homes so you virtually cannot tell inside or out that they are any different from a conventional home.” He is also considered an expert by some in what he calls “strategic relocation;” because of its low population density and diverse economy, Skousen (in line with e.g. survivalist writer James Wesley Rawles) recommend the Intermountain west region of the United States, as a preferred region for relocation and setting up survival retreats. “More than ever, I still consider the nuclear attack on America as inevitable, both because the real axis of evil (Russia and China) are still building for that attack, and because our own government is controlled by those intent upon destroying US sovereignty and delivering our nation over to a socialist New World Order,” says Joel Skousen.

Why isn’t this attitude reflected in the beliefs of most Americans? “The one thing you can learn from the liberal and controlled media […] is the direction in which the conspiracy against liberty is going. […] When they start uniformly promoting certain issues in all the liberal journals (global warming, smart growth, gun control, etc.), it is obvious that there is some coordination going on.” In other words, consensus is proof of a conspiracy – though only when the consensus disagrees with Skousen, of course. “But remember, you can only learn to see through the selectively filtered news dispensed by the establishment media if you have other sources that feed you the missing pieces,” i.e. if you selectively choose to listen only to those denialists and lunatics who already agree with you.

He eloquently describes the future destruction of America in World War 3 after the year 2020 after an economic collapse here; apparently America is arming Israel, China, Russia and other nations with the latest military technology while America disarms and deindustrializes its own infrastructure. It also includes a map of “likely nuclear targets” and, for some reason, active volcanoes.

In the 2008 election Skousen backed the Constitution Party’s Chuck Baldwin, which should be enough to warrant an entry on its own.

Diagnosis: Prime whale.to material.

Worthy, perhaps, of mention is Joel’s brother Mark Skousen. Mark is an Austrian school economist, gold bug and what can only be deemed a Federal Reserve conspiracy theorist. He has written multiple books published by Regnery Publishing and articles and is sometimes recognized as an authority in libertarian circles. His main qualification for our purposes, however, may be his involvement in arranging FreedomFest, which is to a large extent a cesspool of conspiracy theory and quackery mongering

#1151: Joe H. Slate

$
0
0

Joe H. Slate is a licensed psychologist and emeritus professor of psychology at Athens State University. I would accordingly think twice about getting a psychology degree from Athens. Dr. Slate’s research interests include health and fitness, rejuvenation, pain management, … as well as reincarnation, astral projection, and the human aura. The “research” into the latter has partially been funded by the Parapsychology Foundation of New York, partially by private sources, and has apparently led him to found the Parapsychology Research Institute and Foundation (PRIF). He has also written several books, including Beyond Reincarnation; Psychic Vampires (you can read an interview with self-proclaimed psychic vampire Linda Rabinowitz here; she really enjoyed the Twilight movies); Aura Energy for Health, Healing & Balance; and Clairvoyance (http://www.skepdic.com/clairvoy.html) for Psychic Empowerment (“The Art & Science of ‘Clear Seeing’ Past the Illusions of Space & Time & Self-Deception”, and when you read that description literally, you’ll probably see why Slate views self-deception as an illusion). There is a more complete list here (many titles seem to be coauthored with one Carl Llewellyn Weschcke). The contents of the books appear to be rather … repetitive, but I suppose that’s the best recipe for maximizing revenue. In general, Slate seems to be into absolutely any and every branch of New Age mythology there is, and is about as attuned to reality in this field as Texe Marrs is in his.

Diagnosis: Open your mind so that your brain can fall out, take a journey on the astral plane, and/or decide that you need to pay Dr. Slate to help you empower your psychological evolution. Slate might, in fact, be under the impression that he is, indeed, helping people. He isn’t. 

#1152: Harold Slusher

$
0
0

Harold Slusher is one of the grand old men of contemporary creationism, and one of the original founders of the Creation Research Society. Like so many creationist heroes his credentials are questionable. He claims to have an earned PhD from Columbia Pacific University and an honorary DSc from Indiana Christian University. But Indiana Christian is a Bible college (alumni include Joseph Chambers and Rod Parsley), and Columbia Pacific is an unaccredited diploma mill and the alma mater of quite an impressive number of frauds, including Jerry Bergman. Slusher is not alone in this; fellow founding member Clifford Burdick, for instance, got his doctorate from the University of Physical Sciences in Arizona, which is a post office box at an unaccredited institute in Phoenix. Slusher is nevertheless on the CMI List of Scientists Alive Today Who Accept the Biblical Account of Creation, but one never associated the CMI with accuracy or accountability in any case. And Slusher’s work was still invoked by Donald Chittick during the famous McLean v. Arkansas Board of Education as scientific evidence for a young earth, though Chittick’s testimonial does not appear to have helped the anti-science side.

Slusher’s most influential contributions to pseudoscience are probably his attempts to explain away the presence of impact craters on nearly all solar system objects, which naturally creates rather insuperable problems for the Young Earth position. Slusher, with Richard Mandock and Glenn Morton (who later repudiated this claim ), claimed that impact craters on the moon are subject to rock flow, and so cannot be more than a few thousand years old. In other words, they were created during … the Flood. This is not a mainstream scientific position. Slusher’s 1971 paper in Creation Research Society Quarterly claiming that there was not as much cosmic dust on the moon as would be expected if it was 4.5 billion years old, was also widely influential (Kent Hovind used that one quite a bit). Even Answers in Genesis admits that it relies on measurement inaccuracies, however.

Diagnosis: Like we said: a grand old man of pseudoscience who has devoted his life to spreading falsehoods and making the world a worse place to live. He’s pretty old now, though he will probably never realize what kind of crap he devoted his life to. Sad.

#1153: Alice Smith

$
0
0

Alice Smith became more widely known by being part of the impressive group of extremist fundies and dominionists Rick Perry assembled for his infamous Prayer Rally (“The Response”) in 2011. Smith might not have been the most famous or highly profiled fundie there, but she is pretty typical of the lot. With her husband Eddie, Smith is cofounder and executive director of the U.S. Prayer Center in Houston, a pretty prolific speaker on topics such as intercessory prayer, spiritual warfare, deliverance, and so on; editor of Insight; and author of books and articles for outlets such as the Charisma magazine. She is also a regular guest on the 700 Club and Benny Hinn’s show.

She is most famous for her promotion of “spiritual housecleaning”, and has even written a book on the topic. We’ll let her explain:

Demons do not need a specific invitation to oppress and influence people’s lives; they sneak into homes, families and churches at the smallest opportunity, often under the noses of even the most vigilant believers. Spiritual House Cleaning explains, step by step, how readers can rid their lives of the enemy’s influence ... A demonically infected atmosphere is a result of ‘doors’ that have been left open – doors of sin, even the sins of previous residents and of past generations! And evil’s grip is often maintained as a result of one’s possessions. Your home should reflect the pure, peaceful presence of Christ. A defiled spiritual atmosphere will affect you, your relationships, your health and even your success.”

Apparently “cursed items”, which can include everything from shirts to rings, maintain a “spiritual umbilical cord” that attaches to you and gives demonic spirits the ability to plague you with sickness and fill your home with “spiritual pollution”. Yup, that’s the stuff Smith spends her life writing about.

Diagnosis: Yet another piece of evidence, if any were needed, of how unfit Rick Perry ever was for office. As for Smith, though, she shouldn’t really be trusted to use a doorknob without supervision. Completely insane.

#1154: Chris Smith

$
0
0

Christopher Henry “Chris” Smith is the U.S. Representative for New Jersey’s 4th congressional district, and has been in that game since 1981. That’s a lot of time to do a lot of damage, and Smith has been pretty busy about it. Now, in fairness, Smith does appear to have made some efforts to help protect women who are victims of rape, sexual assault, and domestic violence, though one might very well wonder even about these contributions given his difficulties in understanding “rape”, his attempts to get women who hadn’t been “forcibly” (what Todd Akin would call “legitimately”) raped to pay for abortions out of their own pockets, and his suggestion that all sexual assult survivors undergo investigations by the IRS.

He is, though, very much opposed to abortion, and has calledObama the “abortion president” for appointing “radically pro-abortion” people to the government, people who are promoting “evil” with an “anti-child, anti-woman mentality.” (Yes, he seems to think that keeping abortions legal is “anti-woman”). He has even endorsedsome rather ridiculous conspiracy theories about “hidden abortion mandates” in Obamacare.

Apart from that, Smith was, together with Trent Franks, adamant that the US should ally themselves with fundamentalist Islamist countries to oppose United Nations’ recognitions of LGBT rights. And even within the US he maintains some scary ties to dominionist terrorist organizations.

Smith has also been among the staunchest supporters on giving federal grants to religious and other groups on the grounds that their moral outlook fits with his own. For instance, he supports grants to religious-based work promoting sexual abstinence in Africa, all the while complaining that the administration might wrongly be supporting some nonprofit groups that are pro-prostitution, pro-abortion and not committed enough to abstinence priorities – indeed, the “sexual health analyst” for his ally Focus on the Family, Linda Klepacki, said that “even some religious groups emphasize condoms over abstinence” in the fight against AIDS. And Chris Smith cannot have that!

Diagnosis: Fundie extremist. Smith is not the loudest or most flamboyantly batshit representative in Congress, but he is a hardcore supporter of evil and highly dangerous.

#1155: Chuck Smith

$
0
0

Charles Ward “Chuck” Smith is the senior pastor of Calvary Chapel Costa Mesa and the founder of the Calvary Chapel movement, which now includes thousands of congregations worldwide, some of which are among the largest churches in the United States. If ever he had used this kind of influence for good! Well, there is little danger of that, and Smith has instead opted for the “deranged fundamentalist moron” approach to things (John Todd used to claim that Smith was an Illuminati lord, but that is a different story). In his 1978 book End Times, for instance, Smith predicted that the generation of 1948 would be the last generation, and that the world would end by 1981 at the latest (though he also stated that he “could be wrong” although “it’s a deep conviction in my heart, and all my plans are predicated upon that belief,” although he somehow didn’t jeopardize his worldly wealth). Calvary Chapel did arrange a New Years Eve service in 1981 for their followers to wait for the end to occur in accordance with Smith's prediction, and lost some followers when it failed to pass.

But Smith didn’t give up, and he has continued to connect disasters, including 9/11, to divine wrath against homosexuality and abortion.

Calvary Chapel is best known as a central player in the Jesus freak movement (which also spawned e.g. Morris Cerullo, Russell Doughten and Mike Warnke), and rose to power largely by catering to hippies and alternative groups in the 60s. The movement is also partially responsible for inflicting Christian rock upon the world and – not the least – Ray Comfort, who started out as a Calvary minister.

Smith has also raised some controversy for buying influence at and sponsorship from government institutions, including army bases, to preach his hate and doom. That should have been a scandal, but somehow it hasn’t really been received as such.

Diagnosis: Evil, old lunatic who wields scary amounts of power but may, fortunately, be too deranged to be able to employ it to maximum effect. Still. 

Note: Chuck Smith passed away in October 2013, but I had written most of this entry before I noticed. I hence decided to post it anyways, even though Smith is strictly speaking disqualified.

#1156: Craig Smith

$
0
0

Craig Smith is an absolutely magnificently dense columnist for … well, for the WND, so you wouldn’t really set expectations too high when it comes to accuracy, reason and accountability. Indeed Smith is a long-time associate of none other than Jerome Corsi, and was for instance Corsi’s coauthor on Black Gold Stranglehold, one of the most insanely cranky books of pseudoscience ever to appear. The main tenet of the book was … abiotic oil – the idea that oil is not a fossil fuel but a renewable resource, and that the liberals are in a conspiracy to hide this information from the public. Neither Corsi nor Craig has any even remotely relevant expertise in any remotely related field, by the way, but lack of expertise, insight, knowledge or understanding has never been an obstacle for a delusional wingnut crackpot.

Otherwise his columns are of the kind you fear and expect. You can for instane try to find some sense of insight in his expression of shock at the atrocity that US is not enforcing prayer in public schools anymore, but you certainly won’t succee. But then, Smith has demonstrably not the faintest idea how government, or the separation of powers, actually works. And he wasn’t done. If this isn’t one of the stupidest screeds you will ever read, you must have found a well of lunacy I am not aware of.


Standard fare for Smith. Indeed, Smith claims that the goal of “secular progressives” is to eliminate Christianity and Judaism from the US and turn it into a godless society – a standard wingnut delusion, of course, but Smith is determined to win this one, so he claims thatthe reason secular progressives are doing this is to appease the terrorists. That’s the goal of secularism. Apparently it will succeed because there is nothing radical Muslims like better than secular progressives. He even has evidence. Apparently he has received a copy of a “secret plan” from George Soros (the right’s current boogey man du jour), John Kerry, Michael Moore and Howard Dean. It is a bit unclear whether he means that literally, but after his abysmal abiotic oil affair I’d say it’s a fair chance he does.

Diagnosis: Even for a raving wingnut lunatic Smith is in a class of his own. May he continue to make a fool of himself for a long time: His negative influence is probably negligible – people who listen to him are unlikely to be responsive to reality anyways – but he’s got to scare away at least some people initially attracted to wingnuttery.

#1157: Jeffery Smith

$
0
0

Jeffery Smith is a former Iowa political candidate for the Natural Law Party. Smith has no discernible scientific or agricultural training, but he believes, very strongly, that eating GE crops causes infertility, organ damage and endocrine disruption. The scientific evidence for these claims is about as strong as for saying “that looking at carrots will give you brain tumors”. But there is no way Jeffery Smith is going to let actual evidence trump his intuitions based on what he feels is “natural” (or “evidence” such as this, which according to Smith “puts scientists to shame”), and he has managed to become something of a senior figure in a movement that looks strikingly similar to the anti-vaccine movement.

Smith, whose actual education consist of business studies at the rather spectacularly unaccredited Maharishi International University, founded by the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi and who has enjoyed a career advocating yogic flying, has even written two books on GMO foods, Seeds of Deception and Genetic Roulette: The Documented Health Risks of Genetically Engineered Foods, which does not appear to be too careful about documentation (to put it diplomatically). He also runs a “think tank”, The Institute for Responsible Technology.

There is a useful resource on Smith’s claims here (“Smith has shown an amazing capacity to ignore the scientific literature on almost every topic he discusses”) and a thorough review of Genetic Roulettehere. (Instead of a detailed list of the idiocy of Smith’s claims I’d rather direct readers to those resources.)

The problem is that people with real authority have actually taken Smith’s claims seriously. Famed British primatologist Jane Goodall, who has left any aspirations of respectability on these matters behind a while ago yet continues to enjoy some respect in certain circles, generously blurbed Smith’s book (“If you care about your health and that of your children, buy this book, become aware of the potential problems, and take action”) and cited Smith’s “research” extensively in her own Seeds of Hope (she also recommended a book on GM by Maharishi Institute executive vice president Steven M. Druker, who – surprisingly enough –has no scientific training either). Dr. Ozseems to be a fan as well despite being apparently aware of the problems with Smith’s claims; that is less surprising, but still sad. And these are not the only examples – even academic institutions seem to have fallen for Smith’s work on occasion. A good but scary example is here.

There is a useful intro to GMO foods here.

Diagnosis: Super-crank, denialist and conspiracy theorists, and probably one of the most dangerous ones in the US at present – the theme for his conspiracy theories has been trendy enough to endear him even to people who generally don’t fall for these kinds of things. A real and serious threat to civilization.

#1158: Robert Smith

$
0
0

There is more than one loon called “Robert Smith”. There is, for instance, a former editor and sysop at Conservapedia of that name (a member of the infamous Conservapedia Gang of Four, in fact). The Robert Smith we have in mind for this entry, however, is a professor of chemistry at the University of Nebraska, Omaha, and signatory to the Discovery Institute’s petition A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism. Given the, shal we say, subversive language of that petition, being a signatory does not on its own qualify for an entry in this Encyclopedia, and Smith has, as a matter of fact, not talked extensively about evolution in other contexts. What is noteworthy, however, is that Smith alsofigures on James Inhofe’s list of 650 scientists that supposedly dispute the consensus on AGW (taken apart e.g. here). Once again, being on that list isn’t evidence that you dispute the consensus on AGW – Inhofe included whoever he imagined had said things to dispute global warming – but Smith does indeed appear to be a science denialist when it comes to global warming.

Smith is, in fact, a real scientist, but he has indeed made something of a name for himself as a climate “contrarian” (and that he also appears on a list of evolution “contrarians” should kinda undermine his authority in fields he knows little about in general). And if you need more evidence that Smith is a loon, it’s worth point out that he has characterizedSarah Palin as a “rare politician … with brains”. His stance on climate is illuminatingly illustrated here.

Diagnosis: Apparently Smith seems to think that what makes his claims scientific is the fact that he has academic credentials in some field or other. It isn’t. But the attitude is a recipe for pseudoscience, and Smith falls right into it.

#1159: Van Smith

$
0
0

Van Smith is a computer benchmarking expert, computer industry analyst and physicist who is well known enough to readers of various batshit insane fundie conspiracy sites. Smith’s obsession is the Georgia Guidestones, and he is pretty much convinced that the Guidestones express totalitarian messages and intentionally foreshadow the arrival of the Islamic Mahdi, i.e. the Antichrist. Because he is a loon, he also believes the Guidestons are linked through encoded numerological information to the Burj Khalifa, the tallest building in the world. The Burj Khalifa is of course, in Smith’s mind, a new Tower of Babel.. His “research” on these matters is discussed here. “I'm not a conspiracy lunatic who spends all my time researching Freemasonry and things like that,” said Smith, but added that “this evidence is extremely real, and it's disturbing.”

Diagnosis: Conspiracy lunatic who seems to spend far, far too much time researching Fremasonry and things like that. (This one was really too easy.)

#1160: George Edward Smock

$
0
0

A.k.a. Brother Jed

Brother Jed is a wingnut Methodist evangelist who travels around the US to evangelize at college campuses. He is most famous for his anti-gay rants – including his “It’s not Ok to be gay” song (it’s here, if you must) – racism (“The only thing Mexicans contribute to society is burritos and Jewish people are only good at making bagels and running banks”), and for being extremely confrontational about it. Jed also denounces the evils of kissing, bikinis, masturbation (“a masturbator today is a homosexual tomorrow”), sex (“I don’t know how the whorehouses in this town stay open — all of you sorority girls are giving it away for free!”), feminism, liberalism, and – to make sure he stays up to date with the concerns of youths – rock n’ roll.

In short, Brother Jed stands for– and flaunts – everything that is objectionable in fundie ideology, which is why he is liked by freethinker communities and disliked by other fundie groups.

Diagnosis: Innocuous enough – at least his efforts can hardly be claimed to promote the cause of fundamentalism. Though he is definitely a loon, and hysterically so.
Viewing all 2331 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>